Re: Scope caps touching barrel...
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: johnsta</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My butler creek caps are wedged between my barrel and the scope. Is it bad if they touch? Seekins Low rings, SSHD 5-20, M24/40 contour barrel.
Thanks. </div></div>
As <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">"Bedlam"</span></span> stated but did not explain why - <span style="font-style: italic">"Yes"</span>, your Butler Creeks' wedged between your barrel and scope are bad. Anything that touches the barrel and recoil lug changes the harmonics of the barrel and can adversely affect the the rifle's accuracy, hence the practice of <span style="font-style: italic">"free-floating"</span> the barrel. Ideally, for best accuracy nothing forward of the recoil lug should contact the barrel at all.
As <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">"Smrkovsky"</span></span> suggested you can shave the bottom of the BC cap above the barrel where the contact occurs using a razor. Using a Dremel tool can be much faster than using a razor, but a much "cleaner" job can be accomplished by using a fine abrasive Dremel bit at slower speed, then finishing-up with 600 Wet & Dry paper. I knew that I'd have to shave the bottom of my BCs' to get the clearance I wanted for my setup (PMII 5-25X56mm w/USO ARD in Leupold Mark 4 Highs (1.06") on Tac Ops 40 MOA base over Tac Ops Heavy Contour barrel).
As far as how much clearance you "need" that is debateable. I like about .125" (1/8") clearance, but a bit less will work. This should allow the "lid" of the BC to swing open without contacting the barrel (you won't be firing the rifle while you're opening the BC so the harmonics obviously aren't affected here but it's nice to be able to open the BC without the lid hitting the barrel). If you can achieve adequate clearance without replacing the rings go for it. The BC's bottom front is completely flat and has perfect clearance, but I shaved the bottom of the BC on my X-Ray 51 <span style="font-style: italic">a lot</span>.
<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">BC and PMII 5-25X56mm w/USO ARD in Mark 4 Highs (1.06" to ring center) on Tac Ops 40 MOA base over Tac Ops Heavy Contour:</span></span>
I don't know how you selected the Seekins "Low" Rings, but this is why people need to learn how to measure ring height required before they purchase rings instead of relying on other shooters suggestions (unless they have the <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">exact</span></span> same equipment setup), or a Ring Height Guide. It's also why it's really important to reference specific rings (which will tell you their specific height measured from what point to what point) instead of blindly lumping all rings into <span style="font-style: italic">"Low"</span>, <span style="font-style: italic">Medium"</span>, <span style="font-style: italic">"High"</span>, or <span style="font-style: italic">"Extra High"</span>. Not all manufacturers measure rings from the same points-of-reference such as from the top-of-the-base to the center-of-the-ring (some measure from the <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">top-of-the-base</span></span> to the <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">bottom-of-the-hole</span></span>).
The manufacturer, as well as the amount of cant built into the base or Rail also affect the height of the base at the front (the critical measurement) and the rear - another reason to learn to measure your required ring height based on your rifle, scope, and base or rail instead of relying on what others shooters' are using. Measuring required ring height, correctly mounting a scope, and correct diopter adjustment are all things that every scope user should be capable of doing.
Keith