• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Rifle Scopes Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

BobinNC

Petty Officer
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
  • Jan 31, 2009
    4,842
    223
    74
    Goldsboro, NC
    I don't go to the Shot Show, but I do like to read the Optics reviews generously posted by Hide Members and Sponsors both here on on their various blogs.

    My view of the Tactical Optics market, has always been viewed as a three tiered one, when looking at street prices, not MSRP's thus:

    High Priced - Tactical scopes over $2k
    Mid-Priced - Tactical scopes over $1k
    Low-Priced - Tactical Scopes under $1K

    Being economically challenged, and disinclined to embark on a Raman noodle diet to buy a Tactical scope, I tend to focus on the new optics offerings previewed at the Shot Show in the Mid-Priced and Low-Priced categories.

    Before I get into the new Mid and Low priced offerings, I must give a special shout-out to the boys in Beaverton. Leupold apparently has pulled out all the stops, and created a new pricing category, in which they are the only player: Ludicrous-Priced......$4K tactical scopes??? Really???? What are they thinking and drinking in Oregon????

    Mid-Priced:

    Moving on. The Mid-Priced category in tactical scopes, has always been a closely watched by me every year. The $1k to $2K tactical market has always been under-served, being a province of only a few makers like IOR Valdada, one Vortex Razor, and a smattering of over priced and under delivering FFP MIL/MIL 3x zoom variants from Leupold.

    In fact the major player in the category is really Nightforce, with a entire line of MIL/MIL scopes in this price range, abet all SFP, instead of FFP. IMHO Nightforce's really only weak link has been their reticles. So I was pleased to see a bunch of new ones, that look like a large improvement over their old one's.

    But the really big news, at least to me, was Scott's @ Liberty Optics mini review of a new IOR offering.

    Direct From Scott's Blog:

    <span style="font-style: italic">"Another nice surprise and sensible addition to the stable is a 4-16x50 FFP model featuring a MP8-XRT (xtended range tactical) reticle, 30mm tube, side focus, digital illumination, long focal length for easy mounting and a pricetag that will be less than the 35mm FFP models. The XRT reticle is similar to the MP8-A5 but has additional windage holdover points in hash format and further increases the utility of the MP-8 reticle. This scope's reticle has 25mils of holdover capability at 7x and 17mils (61moa) visible at 16x. Lighter in weight and of a more conventional design, I feel this scope will do very well when it comes available this summer."</span>

    I don't know about anybody else, but a 30mm Tubed 4-16x50mm FFP MIL/MIL Illuminated scope, that will sell at a price between $1250.(IOR's 30mm FFP 2.5-10x42MM) and $1750. (IOR's 35mm FFP 3-18x50MM)is very attractive.

    First, 4-16 is one of the most useful ranges for a tactical scope. Not too high on the bottom power, and enough zoom on top for most 1kyd tactical targets. Plus a 30mm tube is eminently more lower mountable and lighter in weight, then the current fashion of 34mm and 35mm big honking FFP scopes.

    If IOR's new baby has at least 16.5 MILS of usable elevation, and IOR can continue to make them like there other 4th Gen offerings, so they don't fail when a cloud passes over the range, this may be something to get excited about.

    Plus it's power to weight ratios put in close competition with Nightforce's outstanding 3.5-15x50mm F1. Never a bad thing.

    The only other new scopes of note is the new Steiner/Burris offering of a 34mm (big fat) FFP line. They do have a 4-16, that has some nice features. But preliminary MSRP prices in the $2400 range,... sigh. I was hoping for a street price of below $2k range, as I don't think any new player is going to make a significant dent in the market by offering a scope with a street price higher than NF F1 or Vortex's Razor.

    Low-Priced:

    The biggest news of the SS 2011 is Weaver's new 3-15x50 illuminated FFP mil/mil. Again I quote from Scott's Blog:

    <span style="font-style: italic">"No question, my "out of nowhere" surprise scopes of the show were a pair of new Weaver Tacticals...a 3-15x50 illuminated FFP mil/mil and a 1-5x24 FFP. The catalog amusingly states these optics are for those who value "Molle over Armani" Let's start with the long range dog. This scope was really nice. 30mm tube, mil/mil, illuminated FFP, locking turrets, extra hard coating on exterior lenses, side focus, resettable turrets, argon purged, 100moa, 6 mils per turn, 13.5 inches long, 27.5 ounces, fast focus eyepiece, are you paying attention? The reticle is an etched EMDR (Enhanced Mildot Ranging). Knob feel isn't anything super great but they do lock. 4" of eye relief. Price? I'm TOLD (nothing in writing) around $1000, available in spring."
    </span>

    This I think is a big deal. The zoom range and features are very NF like, at half the price. If Weaver can actually deliver this scope, and make it rugged enough for the non-combatants to use in tactical comps, this is very exciting.

    In disappointing news, Bushnell is apparently just going to just re-badge it's tactical scope line, not improve them one bit, and just charge more money. I was hoping for a 4-16 FFP illuminated, with a Gen 2 type reticle, but such is not to be.

    That all is saw, in reading the reviews from the 2011 Shot.

    Later,

    Bob
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    Thanks for the info. I am going to be building a budget rifle for the misses fairly soon and that Weaver sounds like a nice piece if they can deliver. Any pics of it floating around?
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    what is the big fascination with illuminated reticles for target shooting? Do you shoot targets in the dark?
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    Yes, first light and lastlight. As well as at night. You won't see the reticle without it. Especially as one gets older.
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MillSpec</div><div class="ubbcode-body">what is the big fascination with illuminated reticles for target shooting? Do you shoot targets in the dark? </div></div>

    At some of the tactical matches there are night shoots.We've had to shoot movers in the darkness even!
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    Kind of disappointing to hear that bushnell actually didn't improve anything on their scopes. Heard they were going to. Any news on the amount of travel on the weaver FFP? Sounds like they are listening to their customers.

    Flyingbullseye
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Flyingbullseye</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Kind of disappointing to hear that bushnell actually didn't improve anything on their scopes. Heard they were going to. Any news on the amount of travel on the weaver FFP? Sounds like they are listening to their customers.

    Flyingbullseye </div></div>

    If you would actually read what I posted you would see Weaver has 100 MOA claimed for elevation travel
    grin.gif


    If that's true, that's a bunch. Very Nightforceish.......
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    Yep you're right, missed that.

    Regarding weaver what really does the extra hard coatings do for the lenses? What level are they comparable to?

    Flyingbullseye
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">In disappointing news, Bushnell is apparently just going to just re-badge it's tactical scope line, not improve them one bit, and just charge more money. I was hoping for a 4-16 FFP illuminated, with a Gen 2 type reticle, but such is not to be.</div></div>

    Thats why I went ahead and picked up one of the clearance FFP 4200s the other day. Nothing in the lower tier that really stood out and the Vortex PST's still arent available. The bushnell 4200 FFP Mil/Mil for $539 from NatchezSS was the best deal I could find.
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BobinNC</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't know about anybody else, but a 30mm Tubed 4-16x50mm FFP MIL/MIL Illuminated scope, that will sell at a price between $1250.(IOR's 30mm FFP 2.5-10x42MM) and $1750. (IOR's 35mm FFP 3-18x50MM)is very attractive.
    </div></div>
    I certainly do as well. As much as I like the 3.5-18, if they could come close performance-wise in a smaller, lighter, less expensive package I think they'd go like hotcakes.

    Did anybody at SHOT get a picture of this scope?
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    Hi all, I'm new. Not a sniper, just like good guns, an even better deal and spending too much money on this sort of thing.
    I wanted to respond here about the Weaver scopes. I have been using Weavers for a few years now. Gave them a chance when no one else did. I love them, best for the money. I am the type of person to do the homework and get the best bang for my buck, not buy because someone in a magazine said it was the best. I actually look away from that most of the time.
    Some scopes have been less than perfect and some have been better than any Nightforce I have shot through. It just depends on the model. They're tactical scopes are awsome. The best thing about Weaver is they still build a scope in Weaver fasion... Tough as the day is long. They haven't changed that at all. You'd be hard pressed to get one off zero in harsh conditions(you have to remember that weaver started the whole "shock proof" thing back in the K4-K19 days). I advise anyone to atleast give any of the Weavers (as your application) a shot before your next Leupold.
    I am curiouse though. Have heard that Nightforce and Weaver, being owned by the same holdings co and both being made in Japan, are actually made in the same factory. True, or, false?
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    I have become a fan of IOR, as they are in the mid range of scopes. For X mass I got a IOR 3.5-18x50 35mm Tactical scope FFP SH from Scott @ Liberty Optics. I am very impressed with the scope. I had the IOR 3-18x42 35mm FFP Sniper's Hide Edition GEN 4 in the past an had to sell due to funds. I like the MP8 reticle more than S&B P4f reticle. The glass is just as clear as the S&B glass. However, the IOR glass is tinted more yellow and the S&B glass just looks brighter. The IOR compared well as far what the scope offers to the S&B.

    The S&B is still better in ever way, but one and that is price. The IOR can be purchase at Liberty Optics for $1779 with rings, while the S&B PM II 5-25x56 P4f CCW sell for $3200 (can be had for $2800 if you look hard) and that does not included rings. So, for a savings of $1421 (not including purchasing rings for the S&B) you don't give up as much as you would think. For example on S&B scope has 26 mils of elevation and the IOR only has 22 mils of elevation.

    S&B on 6.5x55 I only need 8.5 mils (pushing 140s@2720fps) of elevation to get to 1000 yards. I got the IOR for a .260 build and that should only need 8.7 mils with 123s and 8.0 mils with 140s to get to 1000 yards. As you can see what I am giving up in elevation, I just don't need. Also, I like the elevation turret on the IOR better than the S&B. However, the push button lit reticle on the IOR, which I thought I would like, I don't like. It gets accidentally turn on a lot; I wish they had found a way to incorporate it into the parallax knob. Another thing would be the 35 mm tube. Even though you are provided rings when you purchase the scope it would be nice to have more offerings.

    Even though the IOR isn't on par with the S&B and most scope aren't. The IOR is an excellent scope and a bargain for what you pay for it. I will be purchasing at least two more of these scopes for the builds the Mark @ SAC is doing for me and my wife. So, I would recommend and have recommended the IOR scopes to friends and family. Also, I always tell people to get them from Scott @ Liberty Optics, for one he has the best price and second his customer service is great.

    Some pics for comparison:

    IMG_0014-2-1.jpg


    IMG_0019-3.jpg

    Those are med. rings I now have low rings for the IOR

    IMG_0017-2.jpg



    Jamie
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    In the sub-$1k, the pickings are slip with Weaver Tactical, Variable Super Sniper, Viper PST and FFP Bushnells being essentially it.

    However, I think you will see a fair amount of movement in the sub-$2K range over the next 12 months. I will post more when I can.

    ILya
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    Bob, the Weaver sounds like a nice scope but then so does the Vortex PST 4-16 and I think most shooters would be pretty happy with either. Personally, I have found it more satisfying to have at least one rifle with an uber scope (Premier 3-15) and another with a very decent scope (NF 2.5-10X32). What that has meant is "settling" for lesser rifles (although I am quite happy with their sub-.5 MOA accuracy) and selling off others. I'd rather have one or two high-quality rigs than a stable full of motley.
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cutnhrse</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi all, I'm new. Not a sniper, just like good guns, an even better deal and spending too much money on this sort of thing.
    I wanted to respond here about the Weaver scopes. I have been using Weavers for a few years now. Gave them a chance when no one else did. I love them, best for the money. I am the type of person to do the homework and get the best bang for my buck, not buy because someone in a magazine said it was the best. I actually look away from that most of the time.
    Some scopes have been less than perfect and some have been better than any Nightforce I have shot through. It just depends on the model. They're tactical scopes are awsome. The best thing about Weaver is they still build a scope in Weaver fasion... Tough as the day is long. They haven't changed that at all. You'd be hard pressed to get one off zero in harsh conditions(you have to remember that weaver started the whole "shock proof" thing back in the K4-K19 days). I advise anyone to atleast give any of the Weavers (as your application) a shot before your next Leupold.
    I am curiouse though. Have heard that Nightforce and Weaver, being owned by the same holdings co and both being made in Japan, are actually made in the same factory. True, or, false? </div></div>

    Good to hear more about someone's experience with a weaver. Trying to be patient and wait for the new FFP mil/mil tactical to come out. Heard its supposed to come out this spring. No clue about the last question but would be nice to know and if its true.

    Flyingbullseye
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Flyingbullseye</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cutnhrse</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi all, I'm new. Not a sniper, just like good guns, an even better deal and spending too much money on this sort of thing.
    I wanted to respond here about the Weaver scopes. I have been using Weavers for a few years now. Gave them a chance when no one else did. I love them, best for the money. I am the type of person to do the homework and get the best bang for my buck, not buy because someone in a magazine said it was the best. I actually look away from that most of the time.
    Some scopes have been less than perfect and some have been better than any Nightforce I have shot through. It just depends on the model. They're tactical scopes are awsome. The best thing about Weaver is they still build a scope in Weaver fasion... Tough as the day is long. They haven't changed that at all. You'd be hard pressed to get one off zero in harsh conditions(you have to remember that weaver started the whole "shock proof" thing back in the K4-K19 days). I advise anyone to atleast give any of the Weavers (as your application) a shot before your next Leupold.
    I am curiouse though. Have heard that Nightforce and Weaver, being owned by the same holdings co and both being made in Japan, are actually made in the same factory. True, or, false? </div></div>

    Good to hear more about someone's experience with a weaver. Trying to be patient and wait for the new FFP mil/mil tactical to come out. Heard its supposed to come out this spring. No clue about the last question but would be nice to know and if its true.

    Flyingbullseye </div></div>

    Yes the optical stuff for Nightforce scopes is made by the same factory in Japan that makes Weaver Tactical scopes.

    However, that does not mean they are built to the same standard. They build stuff to a particular price point.

    That having been said, I think Weaver's new tactical stuff is very good.

    ILya
     
    Re: Shot Show 2011 - What's in it for Poor Boys??

    Well, I do know this... For years Weaver got ignored by most because they did not produce scopes for the current market demand. However, they have always stayed true to making a REALLY tough scope. Maybe the glass isn't exactly the same, so-to-speak, however it is good glass, made by the same people as NF and is still hardcore Weaver tough. Just doesn't have those Horus reticles. Maybe the new ERD in FFP will be a nice addition.
    I'm just glad that Weaver is putting it up with a good price range for us more price conciouse folk. Not to mention the peeps coming back who had to put most of thier hard earned into thier fams back home and don't have alot of it to put into personal gear.