SilentStalkr Wonna Be Badass Full Member Minuteman Oct 8, 2012 8,918 10,884 44 Somewhere in the US Oct 28, 2020 #1 Oct 28, 2020 #1 Inquiring minds want to know.
Soulezoo Hide Sommelier and Connoisseur of fine spirits Full Member Minuteman Jun 4, 2018 3,114 5,674 Here and there Oct 28, 2020 #2 Oct 28, 2020 #2 Because ACB.
Doc68 I'm an asshole.... Full Member Minuteman Feb 17, 2014 6,312 15,657 USA Oct 28, 2020 #3 Oct 28, 2020 #3 I thought it was because all of the planets lined up to open the gates of freedom.
R RyanScott Sergeant Full Member Minuteman Oct 14, 2005 2,500 1,301 38 Houston Oct 29, 2020 #4 Oct 29, 2020 #4 Justices have geographic areas where they are responsible for monitoring emergent cases and taking them or declining them.
Justices have geographic areas where they are responsible for monitoring emergent cases and taking them or declining them.
MarinePMI Ban Cat Handler Staff member Moderator Commercial Supporter Full Member Minuteman Jun 3, 2010 8,417 13,564 San Diego, Ca Oct 29, 2020 #5 Oct 29, 2020 #5 Because voting laws are a State controlled thing, not the Federal government. Reactions: Not a Sniper
SilentStalkr Wonna Be Badass Full Member Minuteman Oct 8, 2012 8,918 10,884 44 Somewhere in the US Oct 29, 2020 #6 Oct 29, 2020 #6 Yet we going to have the feds sort it out!
E. Bryant STABILITRAK ACTIVE Supporter Full Member Minuteman Oct 25, 2010 6,860 9,933 MI Oct 29, 2020 #7 Oct 29, 2020 #7 SilentStalkr said: Yet we going to have the feds sort it out! Click to expand... That's because we have collectively decided that we can't take a shit without the approval of the Federal government. Reactions: SilentStalkr
SilentStalkr said: Yet we going to have the feds sort it out! Click to expand... That's because we have collectively decided that we can't take a shit without the approval of the Federal government.
bunsen27 ACME Labs Full Member Minuteman Jan 2, 2011 1,768 448 Raleigh, NC Oct 29, 2020 #8 Oct 29, 2020 #8 This is a good read that goes into some of the finer points: Supreme Court Says Wisconsin Election Law To Remain as Written -- Pennsylvania Challenge Now Pending With Justice Barrett redstate.com
This is a good read that goes into some of the finer points: Supreme Court Says Wisconsin Election Law To Remain as Written -- Pennsylvania Challenge Now Pending With Justice Barrett redstate.com
pmclaine Gunny Sergeant Full Member Minuteman Nov 6, 2011 36,081 73,318 57 MA Oct 29, 2020 #9 Oct 29, 2020 #9 The legislature needs to do its job not depend on the court to legislate from the bench. Seems like legislators at all levels want the perk but not the work. Reactions: E. Bryant and SilentStalkr
The legislature needs to do its job not depend on the court to legislate from the bench. Seems like legislators at all levels want the perk but not the work.
BLKWLFK9 Just F'n Send It Podcast Full Member Minuteman Feb 13, 2017 4,270 8,599 Oct 29, 2020 #10 Oct 29, 2020 #10 B/c Gov Cooper knows he's about to have a change of address and wants to do everything he can to prevent it. Fuck Cooper.
B/c Gov Cooper knows he's about to have a change of address and wants to do everything he can to prevent it. Fuck Cooper.
Charger442 Sergeant Supporter Full Member Minuteman Supporter Nov 2, 2010 5,316 6,915 South Texas Oct 29, 2020 #11 Oct 29, 2020 #11 the way i saw it had to do with what the election laws currently were in the states and how the individual state supreme courts ruled. because, yes, its a curious issue that some states get to count votes until the next Friday
the way i saw it had to do with what the election laws currently were in the states and how the individual state supreme courts ruled. because, yes, its a curious issue that some states get to count votes until the next Friday