I recently picked up a NF 2.5-10x24 for my LMT MWS, thinking it would be a top choice for an all-around scope on that rifle.
I already had a SWFA SS 3-9x42 on a FN FAL, and it is a very good scope, as well.
Between the two, I see very little if any difference in glass quality. This is of course the uneducated opinion of a simple country boy used to Leupold being the "top of the line".
The SS has a better field of view at the same power as the NF. Not surprising, given the almost double size of the objective.
The reticle in the SS is a better reticle when both scopes are used without illumination, but the illumination feature of the NF is invaluable for low light operation. However, if I can't get batteries, give me the SS.
Both scopes are very stout, but I would give the edge to the NF based purely on visual observation and handling.
My opinion so far is that if you need illumination, the SS is a no go, but if you don't, it is one hard scope to beat, especially for the price. This opinion is subject to change with more use, as I have not had either scope for long, and deer hunting has been keeping me busy(4x Leupy on a pre-war model 70 in '06). Will get to the range and work both scopes out more as the winter progresses. It should prove interesting. I know this is an apples vs. oranges comparison, but these are the scopes I have, and I figured the info might help somebody trying to pick out a scope.
I already had a SWFA SS 3-9x42 on a FN FAL, and it is a very good scope, as well.
Between the two, I see very little if any difference in glass quality. This is of course the uneducated opinion of a simple country boy used to Leupold being the "top of the line".
The SS has a better field of view at the same power as the NF. Not surprising, given the almost double size of the objective.
The reticle in the SS is a better reticle when both scopes are used without illumination, but the illumination feature of the NF is invaluable for low light operation. However, if I can't get batteries, give me the SS.
Both scopes are very stout, but I would give the edge to the NF based purely on visual observation and handling.
My opinion so far is that if you need illumination, the SS is a no go, but if you don't, it is one hard scope to beat, especially for the price. This opinion is subject to change with more use, as I have not had either scope for long, and deer hunting has been keeping me busy(4x Leupy on a pre-war model 70 in '06). Will get to the range and work both scopes out more as the winter progresses. It should prove interesting. I know this is an apples vs. oranges comparison, but these are the scopes I have, and I figured the info might help somebody trying to pick out a scope.