Re: Suppressor for DTA .338
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sr90</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Our cans were not designed for the civilian market</div></div>
Then why do I want one? I'm a civilian. Does your suppressor only work on guns in the act of shooting bad guys? All that statement means to me is that there will be a "our military uses it" surcharge of about 60%. See surefire suppressors, if you get my drift. Now if you are coming to the table with something completely unique and innovative as your SRS was... you'll do well with us lowly civilians.
I'm sure you realize you are entering a FIERCELY competitive marketplace, in which there isn't much room to begin with. Trying to get the SRS picked up by military contracts so you can rake in the taxpayer dough, and offering your own suppressor is logical. Otherwise you'd just be giving money away when trying to sell the "weapon system" to the military. It makes sense.
I hope you get there. Just remember the little civilian's role in getting you that far. Your stuff is not chump change, and a hell of a lot of civilians have bought them. ... and just because I'm a civilian, doesn't mean I always have been.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sr90</div><div class="ubbcode-body">we are six months behind schedule on the HTI and it is due to six months of distraction doing custom modifications to the SRS for the PSR program.</div></div>
I hope its everything you say it will be when it does ship. From the outside looking in, it would seem that you are spread too thin.
I've heard this "not designed for civilians" language before. About the last thing I want to see is DTA becoming a "we're too important to work with civilians" shop. ... and while you'll be able to say "no way never" right now, once the big dollars start getting thrown around, most companies will renege on that statement in a heartbeat.