• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Tanker's Attacked !! Great.

what i want to know is how did iran know there was another mine attached to the hull of the ship? And how did they know where it was and what is the logic behind sending someone to remove it?

These things emit radio signals? Can they track them? I am ignorant as fuck regarding this. But as an infantryman, i know that if you throw a grenade....and it doesnt go BOOM, it’s best not to fucks with it after that. Unless the pin and spoon didnt get removed....
 
I HAVE THE ANSWER!!!!!

Actually George Carlin did.

Take all the illegals of fighting age crossing the border illegally.
Give em a rifle, ammo, and a canteen and a plane ride to go fight Iran.
After a year of fighting, they can come be an American.

If they refuse to do the above, still give them a plane ride to Iran, without a rifle, ammo, or canteen.......

All jokes aside this is spooky stuff.
Either the Iranians, someone else who needs/wants that war, or the MIC as alluded to working on making a few more billion off of the American service members lives.

BMA.
In the throws of international mess, the commies will push harder to destroy our republic
 
what i want to know is how did iran know there was another mine attached to the hull of the ship? And how did they know where it was and what is the logic behind sending someone to remove it?

These things emit radio signals? Can they track them? I am ignorant as fuck regarding this. But as an infantryman, i know that if you throw a grenade....and it doesnt go BOOM, it’s best not to fucks with it after that. Unless the pin and spoon didnt get removed....

You assume the mine was not intended to go off...duds happen, so it needed to be removed so no evidence was left behind (beyond the chemical residue of the detonated mine).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slash0311
Having lived as long as I have an seen most all the B/S people on this rock will do in the name of power/money, I do not trust anything printed, photoed, recorded, or video taped any more. I have seen evidence tampered with, people I somewhat trusted prior lie under oath, AAR reports (about events I was involved in) changed to fit an agenda, an the depths this country an others will go to to sway public option. The people I trust any more is a very small circle, an that is sad as this is not the country or world I grew up in or was taught to believe in,..
 
This could be a Soros financed deal.

He really needs our great and amazing republic to crumble.

As alluded to, an international crisis or the US in another war makes that way more possible.

Ordering more today from my hospital office.......?
 
Bloomberg

The U.S. political and military standoff with Iran hardened as conflicting narratives about a pair of attacks on tankers near the Persian Gulf stoked regional tensions and President Donald Trump vowed that Tehran will not be allowed to close a key oil shipping lane.



With U.S.-Iranian relations already at a low point, American officials released images they said showed that Iran was involved in a mine blast that forced the evacuation of a tanker near the entrance to the Gulf on Thursday. Tehran denied involvement, and the owner of the ship refuted the U.S. assertion that the blast came from a mine, adding to the confusion over what happened and who was responsible.



“Iran did do it and you know they did it,” Trump said Friday during a phone interview with Fox News. “You saw the boat at night.”



OMAN-US-IRAN-GULF-POLITICS-SECURITY-OIL-SHIPPING

Video grab released by CENTCOM.
Source: AFP
While both sides have said they’re not looking for war, events have taken on a momentum of their own with U.S. and Iranian forces bolstering their military presence, raising the threat of a miscalculation. Even so, investors took the risk in their stride. Brent oil futures in London traded slightly lower on Friday at $61.15 a barrel, set for a weekly decline as concern about faltering demand outweighed those of Middle East tensions.



“I don’t think there’s any conclusive evidence that Iran was to blame,” Amrita Sen, chief oil analyst at Energy Aspects Ltd. in London, said on Bloomberg Television. “Clearly political tensions are ratcheting higher,” she said, while cautioning that other groups in the region could also have carried out the attacks. “We just don’t have enough proof right now,” said Sen.

In a press statement on Thursday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo ran through a list of recent incidents the U.S. has pinned on Iran, from previous tanker blasts to missiles fired at a Saudi airport to a car bomb in Afghanistan.

“This is only the latest in a series of attacks instigated by the Islamic Republic of Iran and its surrogates against American and allied interests,” Pompeo said. He referred to an Iranian threat in April to interrupt the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to open ocean and one of the world’s most important energy-transit chokepoints, and said that Iran was “now executing on that promise.”

“They’re not going to be closing it,” Trump told Fox News.

Senior Trump administration officials said earlier Thursday that the U.S. was considering a number of responses, including the possibility of providing naval escorts to commercial ships traveling through the Strait of Hormuz. An American military response hasn’t been ruled out, they said, and all options are on the table.

Pompeo also said that U.S. efforts backed by Trump to get Iran to negotiate have been rebuffed by Iran’s leadership. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was on an “historic” trip to convince Iran to de-escalate and enter into talks, but was rejected by Iran’s supreme leader, who said he had no response to Trump.

Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani threw blame for the increased tensions at the U.S., saying Trump was using America’s “economic, financial and military capabilities as tools” in order to “destroy international rules and structures,” according to the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency on Friday.

In an unusual step, U.S. Central Command released video footage of what it said was an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps patrol boat removing an unexploded mine from the Kokuka Courageous tanker after another mine had detonated and damaged it. The blurry footage showing a small boat pulling up next to the tanker and crew removing an object from its hull was taken by U.S. aircraft in the region, according to a tweet by the U.S. Navy.

But in remarks to Japanese media, the president of the company that owns the ship said the vessel wasn’t damaged by a mine. “A mine doesn’t damage a ship above sea level," said Yutaka Katada, president of Kokuka Sangyo, the owner and operator of the vessel. “We aren’t sure exactly what hit, but it was something flying towards the ship,” he said.

"It is the assessment of the U.S. government that Iran is responsible for today's attacks in the Gulf of Oman...."@StateDept @SecPompeopic.twitter.com/sTIB0p1kCE
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2019
The tanker was carrying 225,000 tons of methanol from Saudi Arabia to Asia and was flying a Panama flag. It was attacked twice in incidents three hours apart, forcing the crew to evacuate. It’s unlikely to sink or lose fuel or goods onboard, but the vessel will need to be repaired, Katada said. The U.S. said the ship’s crew was rescued by a Dutch tug and later taken aboard the USS Bainbridge.

The crew of a second damaged tanker, the Norwegian-owned Front Altair, was put aboard a Revolutionary Guards Corp vessel, the U.S. said. That ship was sailing in international waters when it was damaged by an explosion, and that the episode was being treated as a “hostile attack,” its manager said. The ship had loaded a cargo of naphtha in Abu Dhabi and was bound for Taiwan, a company official said.

relates to Gulf on Edge as Conflicting Accounts of Tanker Attacks Swirl


Source: CENTCOM
Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif suggested that Iran’s enemies may have been behind the attacks and reiterated calls for a regional dialogue.

“Suspicious doesn’t begin to describe what likely transpired,” he wrote on Twitter on Thursday. That comment was mocked by Pompeo, who described it as “sardonic” and said that while Zarif might have thought it was funny, no one else in the world did.

Earlier: OPEC Still Gridlocked on Meeting Date Amid Iran-Saudi Schism

Oil Risk
Two suspected attacks on tankers at the mouth of the Persian Gulf

Source: Marine Traffic

Read More: As Oil Tankers Burn in the Gulf, Investors Focus on Trade War

The episode came a day after Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen fired a missile at a Saudi airport, wounding 26 people.

relates to Gulf on Edge as Conflicting Accounts of Tanker Attacks Swirl

Kokuka Courageous crew members receive assistance aboard the USS Bainbridge on June 13.
Source: U.S. Navy
— With assistance by David Wainer, Glen Carey, Ramsey Al-Rikabi, Ichiro Suzuki, Benjamin Harvey, and Francine Lacqua
 
Unfortunately, he is one of the most well guarded individuals on the planet. Pulling that off would be difficult
 
Unfortunately, he is one of the most well guarded individuals on the planet. Pulling that off would be difficult


So you are saying a gentle touch is needed? Send the 82nd. And the 101st. Promise booze, whores, and a 4 day weekend pass for the battalion that collects that motherfuckers head.

however well guarded he may be, his hide would be skun within a week if we wanted to. If i were prez, i’d give that order.
 
Not saying we 'need' to go to war over this...At least overtly (covert/support???). But anyone that thinks that Iran is NOT behind most of the Islamic terrorism around the world has their head...in the sand...Trying to be polite...JSNS
 
Not saying we 'need' to go to war over this...At least overtly (covert/support???). But anyone that thinks that Iran is NOT behind most of the Islamic terrorism around the world has their head...in the sand...Trying to be polite...JSNS

I beg to differ....

Just look at which religious bent the terrorist tend to be, for example ISIS or like our good old favorite bad guys AQ...
Most of them are the good old Saudi brand of Islam....
It wasn't Iranians that did the worst terror attack in the history of the USA... It was folks from our "friends" the Saudis.

The Iranians are much more interested in fighting the Saudis and their satellite states (and of course every muslim's favourite enemy Israel).
 
Anyone remember the beginning of the Arab spring? The commander in chief at the time refused to give the people of Iran even tacit support for rising up against the mullah's. Things could be very different today if he had some balls. Instead, he empowered the regime with his bullshit deal and made the world more dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Last Chance