This POS Bleeding Heart Needs a Visit

#2
shall we throw him a Blanket party?.....or should we just go give him a pair of Jersey slippers and be done with this cuck?

honestly, as an educator, im ashamed this guy is considered a Peer.......and im astounded this guy still has a job.
 
#3
The Left seems to love confrontation these days. I was thinking a couple dozen vets in uniform just popping in to say "hi." Part of me wonders if he's a hot dog man. I'd hate to pick up the mustard at the cart and have an involuntary cramp while squeezing. But I doubt he even goes to the food trucks. By the looks of him, he's a cheap-ass brown-bagger with three carrots and a fistful of granola.
 
#4
I have yet to understand how a white person says we need to get rid of the white race. so they are saying they want to commit suicide? i would help him out.
 
#5
but seriously......how can someone like Paula deen have her career ruined because she was alleged to have said "Nigger" 20 yrs ago..........but someone like this can call for a "white genocide" and have it not effect them in the least?

i mean hell, with paula deen, there was outrage all over........but with this "guy" i havent heard a peep
 
Last edited:
#7
Typical how he can take what someone else does and make it all about themselves.

Anyone else notice how it's cool for them to hate the military and war again, didn't do that while their buddy was in office stirring up the entire Middle East or drone striking the fuck out of everything (but nothing really important)...
 
#10
It's a shame that pieces of shit like this can't go on a no respond list . You know the kinda shit bag that hates the police and advocates violence against them or in this case some self loathing white hating vet disrespecting terd . So if he calls 911 he should hear fuckin crickets . It's a shame that it is lost on this asshole that the soldier he disrespected helps protect his right to be a slimy pos .
 
#12
mcameron said:
i mean hell, with paula deen, there was outrage all over........but with this "guy" i havent heard a peep
Click to expand...

You just reminded me of what Tracy Morgan said about her. He was talking about when she was on SNL and she cooked for the cast. He said, "She was a white woman raised in the South in the 60s. Hell, if she said that she had never said "nigger" I'd wonder what was wrong with her. But I can tell you one thing - if she said to me, "Here, nigger, I cooked you some turnip greens and fried chicken," I'd say (big grin), "Thank you, Baby!""

 
#16
Greg Langelius * said:
He's not the problem. His employers, the Drexel Board are. They are the people who need to be dropped.

Most institutes of higher learning get and depend on federal funds. Maybe some of them should lose that. I can think of one to start with. Or maybe keep the funding, but drop the director(s).

It used to be that such institutions took pains to protect their reputation, in the hope of preserving their donors' favor. That has definitely changed. I think it's time somebody or other looked up that donor list and started educating their benefactors as to the values, behaviors, and attitudes of their directors.

A lot of those donors are corporate entities, whose bottom line just might be impacted once their distributions of investor funds were made more public.

Can you say, "Sell my shares in that corporation!".

The real power in this nation is financial. Lots of colleges already have large enough financial holding to operate for literally decades without even charging tuition. That is the foundation underpinning their arrogance.

Maybe their tax exempt status needs to be reviewed, since they are clearly operating at a profit. This would be a prime consideration to be examined as a facet of the upcoming tax reform program.

If sanctuary cities can lose their federal funding, so perhaps can not-for-profit learning institutions with vast financial holding have their tax exemptions revoked, and their Federal subsidies terminated. They need to pay these morons' salaries out of the institutions' funds, and not the taxpayers'.

The first Amendment has been interpreted in an overly broad manner. Like it or not, that horse is out if the barn. It may be the key fault undermining the Constitution and the Nation. While this situation stands, there will be a parade of morons who never gave a thought to the price paid, and by whom, that underlies the liberty allowing those morons to behave like morons.

Before we lament the unfairness of granting the morons the benefits of the rights whose defenders they despise, let us recognize that such rights can be revoked by simple means of criminal incarceration. If the IRS can target conservatives, they can also target liberals. That's not just fair, it's an obligatory righting of the balance sheet. Does anybody really believe those morons are upstanding pillars of righteous behavior? The IRS even brought down Capone; the least they can do is expose some smarmy professor's devious little peccadilloes and put him away for legitimate tax evasion, or target him for a tax audit at the very least.

This is the outcome of several terms of liberal domination of the branches of government. That ought to have been resolved by the last election, but liberals don't support or obey laws. They need to be held accountable for their lawlessness. When these crooks go to ground, leave them no ground to go to.

Just thinking out-loud...

Greg
Click to expand...

I would rather this asshole prof. have his 1stA right than live in a place where speech is sanctioned by the latest Committee of Echo Chambers.

To try and ruin through boycott or action against employers is the tactic of snowflakes. Like the ones who brought so much pressure on that Christian bakery that it had to close down. That was a "freedom fail".

There was a thread a while ago about mil saying "fuck you" to those who say "thank you for your service" in an obligatory manner. If the .mil crew are inured to that then this puke is water off a ducks back.

We, here, in this thread give him exactly what he wants.

I would rather he say what he will and realize no one important is listening. Fuck this thread.
 
#17
It's a double-edged deal.

How many times have we been outraged that someone from "our side" got crucified for saying something insensitive, even if factual, about a "protected" segment of society or a member of same?

At the same time, we can't help but be pissed that the same standards of media overplay and outrage that have derailed careers in such cases previous seem to be conspicuously absent in this one.

Are we the United State of Offended or is that what we've been saying what we don't want to be?
 
#18
We aren't pissed that beta males such as this one are talking. The double standard being applied when one side or the other speaks up.
This isn't a 1st issue as much as the hypocrisy of the 1st being applied or not.
POG what you describe is already being applied on universities and beyond. Only on the conservatives.

R
 
#19
This [IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/www.snipershide.com\/shooting\/core\/webkit-fake-url:\/\/3407b440-cc5c-4465-be52-55528dea67be\/imagejpeg"}[/IMG2]

[IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/www.snipershide.com\/shooting\/core\/webkit-fake-url:\/\/d09e51b0-7671-4661-a8fd-6c02c369d50b\/imagejpeg"}[/IMG2]
 
Last edited:
#20
[No message]
 

Attachments

  • photo52024.jpg
    photo52024.jpg
    104.5 KB · Views: 10
#21
Tucker301 said:
It's a double-edged deal.

How many times have we been outraged that someone from "our side" got crucified for saying something insensitive, even if factual, about a "protected" segment of society or a member of same?

At the same time, we can't help but be pissed that the same standards of media overplay and outrage that have derailed careers in such cases previous seem to be conspicuously absent in this one.

Are we the United State of Offended or is that what we've been saying what we don't want to be?
Click to expand...

i mean....i get what you are saying......but theres a difference between saying something offensive....and calling for racial genocide......and then theres the fact that he has an incredibly punchable face.

and honestly, i dont think many of us are actually offended at what hes saying.....i think were more or less just fed up with the hypocrisy of it all.

the left calls conservatives "radicals" and " intolerant" ........all while calling for genocide and rioting in the streets.....
 
Last edited:
#22
We're constantly dealing with the Left telling us en masse to STFU and making bolder and bolder physical assaults upon the Right and destroying public property. I see nothing wrong with insisting on decorum and decency, even if it crumples the jagged little edges of absolute free speech, even in the smallest way. Free speech is a pair of one way streets running into each other with a tenuous buffer in between. If the Fourth Estate wants to play unilateral propaganda machine, I say the hell with them and over the fuckin' ramparts to play Politeness Man.
 
#24
Rthur said:
We aren't pissed that beta males such as this one are talking. The double standard being applied when one side or the other speaks up.
This isn't a 1st issue as much as the hypocrisy of the 1st being applied or not.
POG what you describe is already being applied on universities and beyond. Only on the conservatives.

R
Click to expand...

R + Tucker

i agree. The selective coverage and biased editorializing is blatant and infuriating but it's also ineffective - to wit the election results. It's what we do in the ballot box that counts. This asshole on twitter isn't going to change anyone's mind. He's so polarized only those who are think like him will ever agree with him. His net effect is nil unless we give his words weight.

If we get worked up over every nitwit's utterances and suggest someone beat them up or punish their employer we're going to be just as thin skinned, outraged and mired in activist faggotry as the thing we hate.

On a side note, Veet, you're local to the good professor, why don't you pay him 'the visit'?

 
#25
APintOfGuinnessPlease! said:
R + Tucker

i agree. The selective coverage and biased editorializing is blatant and infuriating but it's also ineffective - to wit the election results. It's what we do in the ballot box that counts. This asshole on twitter isn't going to change anyone's mind. He's so polarized only those who are think like him will ever agree with him. His net effect is nil unless we give his words weight.

If we get worked up over every nitwit's utterances and suggest someone beat them up or punish their employer we're going to be just as thin skinned, outraged and mired in activist faggotry as the thing we hate.

On a side note, Veet, you're local to the good professor, why don't you pay him 'the visit'?
Click to expand...

I suggested a committee of uniformed well-wishers as being most representative of those who, when shown decency and respect, seem to bring dyspepsia and emotional distress. Had you read the thread with more care and less interest in counting coup, you might have noticed that the professor is on a long research trip to UNAM, a Mexico City area university.
 
#26
APintOfGuinnessPlease! said:
R + Tucker

i agree. The selective coverage and biased editorializing is blatant and infuriating but it's also ineffective - to wit the election results. It's what we do in the ballot box that counts. This asshole on twitter isn't going to change anyone's mind. He's so polarized only those who are think like him will ever agree with him. His net effect is nil unless we give his words weight.

If we get worked up over every nitwit's utterances and suggest someone beat them up or punish their employer we're going to be just as thin skinned, outraged and mired in activist faggotry as the thing we hate.

On a side note, Veet, you're local to the good professor, why don't you pay him 'the visit'?
Click to expand...

I'm not so much worked up as fed up. These types aren't interested in letting up. Should we wait until they escalate the situation to violence?
I see them as spoiled children. They will continue said behavior until corrected.

R
 
#27
mcameron said:
i mean....i get what you are saying......but theres a difference between saying something offensive....and calling for racial genocide......and then theres the fact that he has an incredibly punchable face.

and honestly, i dont think many of us are actually offended at what hes saying.....i think were more or less just fed up with the hypocrisy of it all.

the left calls conservatives "radicals" and " intolerant" ........all while calling for genocide and rioting in the streets.....
Click to expand...

Project and polarize. They might have picked up that strategy somewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PatMiles
This New York Sob Parlour Lets People Cry Their Hearts Out In Private Rooms
Replies
22
Views
790
Ronws
Ronws
Gunfighter14e2
Most of us knew he was a POS long before this.
Replies
10
Views
892
Gunfighter14e2
Gunfighter14e2
PatMiles
Former Democrat Senator Bob Menendez Sobs in Court as Judge Sentences Him to 11 YEARS in Prison For Bribery!
Replies
23
Views
817
DarnYankeeUSMC
DarnYankeeUSMC
Edsel
GET YOUR NUCLEAR STIFFY RIGHT HERE!
Replies
36
Views
3K
Edsel
Edsel
P
AR-10 Precision Rifle Shopping - Need Some Input & Advice
Replies
22
Views
2K
isakhnov
I
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts