To wreck the Military from within

candyx

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Apr 6, 2014
    8,682
    17,909
    Besides democrats under funding the military to destroy it they decided that they could wreck it as well from within using their progressive ideology. Trans Sensitivity training at Military Schools, how many trannies are in the services ? Army Rangers had to pass women even though they couldn't complete the training that the men have to go through. Obama wanted to use it as an large employment service , not for defending a Nation. No wonder why they are charging service members for murder when killing the enemy in combat, who wants to fight if your going to get in trouble by some liberal commander ?
    51OgFn2yWHL._SX335_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Thorny
    Do they actually hate the Country that much that they would weaken it that it could be conquered under their watch ? I can see having differences on bullshit social issues but when it comes to our protection I can't understand why you wouldn't want the best protection out there unless they accounted for cutting a deal with the enemy combatants to aid them in exchange for their freedom.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Greg Langelius *
    Changing times are tough. The military has always been an environment of experimentation, be it socially, technologically, medically, or weaponry related. It’s always been that way, for better or worse.

    Personally I don’t give a shit if your a former dude who was a woman but was born a man but likes cats and dudes who identify as women but also identify as dudes who identify as a desk chair, as long as you want to serve, can run/jump/stomp/shoot/clear a room/follow orders/think outside of the box/and not fall asleep in a hide. If you can do that, then you’re someone I’d want on my team and would share a sleeping bag with you if it came to it (#BeenThereDoneThat #FuckTheCold).

    Quality leadership, that isn’t fucking toxic and part of the many problems that plague the military, is what will help keep the machine running during the honeymoon periods of experimentation.


    As for the other comment...
    Committing war crimes is not the same as killing enemy combatants. Just going to leave that there. Pretty sure we didn’t execute detainees after finding US equipment or a fuck ton of bomb making materials in their homes, or when they smiled at us after an explosion shook the entire fucking house that happened to also leave nothing but part of a fucking frame of the humvee that was driving down the road.

    The assholes that fuel the enemy’s propaganda machine by committing war crimes and stooping to the enemy’s level are just putting more friendly lives at risk. We must follow the rules and be disciplined enough to not let emotion drive our actions.
    ?
     
    Do they actually hate the Country that much that they would weaken it that it could be conquered under their watch ? I can see having differences on bullshit social issues but when it comes to our protection I can't understand why you wouldn't want the best protection out there unless they accounted for cutting a deal with the enemy combatants to aid them in exchange for their freedom.

    Yes. I think they are so blinded with their politics and antipathy that National Security is rather far down on their list of priorities. Too far.

    That's what one world means to too many of them; BAMN.

    Greg
     
    Do they actually hate the Country that much that they would weaken it that it could be conquered under their watch ? I can see having differences on bullshit social issues but when it comes to our protection I can't understand why you wouldn't want the best protection out there unless they accounted for cutting a deal with the enemy combatants to aid them in exchange for their freedom.

    It sucks and is bullshit but politics is what the name of the game is when it comes to congress and those who work at the Pentagon level. A lot of the bad ideas come from those looking to win votes, leave their mark, or pick up that bird/next star before getting out. I don't think it stems from a hatred of our country, but I think it is a byproduct of a toxic environment. So yep, national security sometimes (most of the time) falls to the wayside of personal gain. Unfortunately that's the name of the game. Personally I think its bullshit but I'm too busy watching HGTV to run for office with the hopes of unfucking everything.

    Hell there are so many things that occur at the BN level that greatly influence (hinder) our combat readiness, in terms of the lack of training/budget/equipment/professional development/swift and forceful removal of toxic personnel/retention incentives for quality personnel, that have a greater impact on our combat effectiveness than another PPT class on how Jimmy used to have a penis and Mary now has Jimmy's penis and just passed BUDs. That's the bigger issue that no one is paying attention to as grunts continuously bitch about before giving up and turning to the bottle while counting the days until their EAS. Hell, even the gross mismanagement of funding for combat arms units and SOF units plays more of a factor in terms of limiting the combat effectiveness of our military (than penises/former penises/vaginas/former vaginas #ItsLikeAKenDollDownThere).

    As for cutting deals with the enemy... Shit man, that's all DOS does and has ever done. That's one of their main jobs and a necessary evil within the diplomacy life cycle. They been meeting with the Taliban/every enemy since day one, let alone in 2012 lol. That's just a normal day in the life of an FSO...and the DSS and PSS (EPD) dudes who protect them during the meetings. While many hate on State, they are a vital department that saves lives every day. #YouCanKillAManWithAPenJustAsEasilyWithAPew #PensAndPewsGoHandInHand #PensaveLives #StopReadingPenAsPenis #IKnowYouDidAtLeastOnce #Penis #ToldYou
     
    I see fraggings with a twist, moving to the forefront again,

    Yea with everyone wearing a go pro these days outside the wire... Don't think so chief. Plus it ain't like the old days I used to hear about where the enlisted chain of command were supposed to have your back either...uhhh nope you best believe if LTs start turning up KIA you will be doing max time in levanworth cuz TOP needs his ncoer recommendation for E9 and you look the bullet point to get it locked
     
    Do they actually hate the Country that much that they would weaken it that it could be conquered under their watch ? I can see having differences on bullshit social issues but when it comes to our protection I can't understand why you wouldn't want the best protection out there unless they accounted for cutting a deal with the enemy combatants to aid them in exchange for their freedom.


    Maybe not hate the country, but based on words/actions they definitely hate what it stands for (semantics?). Most of the democrats running of the nomination are avowed socialists (Commie Lite). What country would most likely move in if we implode? I think that's what they want.
     
    Do they actually hate the Country that much that they would weaken it that it could be conquered under their watch ? I can see having differences on bullshit social issues but when it comes to our protection I can't understand why you wouldn't want the best protection out there unless they accounted for cutting a deal with the enemy combatants to aid them in exchange for their freedom.

    It's not that they don't want to be able to defend our country. They think that if it all goes to hell, they'll hit the respawn option and keep on playing.
     
    The assholes that fuel the enemy’s propaganda machine by committing war crimes and stooping to the enemy’s level are just putting more friendly lives at risk. We must follow the rules and be disciplined enough to not let emotion drive our actions.
    ?

    Or we become them.
     
    Do they actually hate the Country that much that they would weaken it that it could be conquered under their watch ? I can see having differences on bullshit social issues but when it comes to our protection I can't understand why you wouldn't want the best protection out there unless they accounted for cutting a deal with the enemy combatants to aid them in exchange for their freedom.
    WE are being sold out, plain and simple. We are the worlds "piggy bank". When I was "In", I felt we were the strongest, most prepared, nation in the world and I was proud to be part of the Big Picture. I feel for the young men and women that are in our branches of service. All this "touchy-feely" shit, has no place in our Military, period. Our purpose, is to conquer enemies, foreign and domestic, period. The Military needs to bring back the "don't ask, don't tell" phrase again also. The military needs to get back to being the military, with one purpose and one purpose only. Mac:(
     
    • Like
    Reactions: candyx