Rifle Scopes Trijicon needs to get off their butts

[Javelin]

And make a 1-4 TRG-24 with ballistic and Mil reticle options. Their glass is excellent but reticle choices really stink to high hell. Who do I write?

 

[lennyo3034]

I would have bought one already if they had better reticles.

 

[GMZ]

I would be happy if they simply put the ACOG reticles in. How hard could that be?

 

[rpk762]

No kidding. Granted why change when they are still selling? you know it is about maximizing profit not customer experience.

 

[Javelin]

The reason why I'm a little po'd at the moment is I was glassing this evening in lowlight conditions with both my new Z6i 1-6 and Trijicon 1-4 and to my eye (at 1x and 4x) the little Trijicon really held it's own against the Swarovski minus the obviously smaller eye box and field of view. The Trijicon is really a great little scope but the German reticle blows and the other triangle options blow even more, glass is superb... They just need to put a half ass effort and yes throw so e of their acog reticules in there. Shame on them.

 

[Javelin]

And yes they could give their scope a larger eye box but I'm not even asking for that. Their glass is superb. But no, they make that bastardized abortion of a product battery powered brick scope (or whatever they are calling it) instead. Maybe I should (or at least someone should) go into business modding their scope reticules like P&F does. Probably make a killing just placing mil reticules in their scopes. Save people from buying Swarovski (or razor hd's).

 

[TallShot]

If the gov't contracts ever start to dry; I think we'd see some change.

Till then? Not happening, IMO.