I'm looking to eventually replace two burris fullfield II scopes. One is on a Remington 700 .308 and the other is on a 20" bull barrel AR-15. I currently own two Trijicon scopes that are on other rifles. I have been pleased with them so far. I am currently limited to a max distance of 200-300 yds. Daylight, low light, and possibly night shooting. I also shoot frequently with subsonic loads. Due to the subsonics, I need to dial my scopes up and down a lot. The trijicons have been good for this so far. The burris scopes do not have enough adjustment, so I max out the elevation and then use one of the drop down cross hairs. So far, the tracking has been good on both of these. Who knows how the tracking will be long term. Next week, I'm getting a used SWFA 10X42M for the Remington. I got it cheap enough that it wont be a big loss if I don't like it. Lack of illumination may be an issue for me. Dual illumination, no switch, and no batteries is a huge plus to me. This is why I was considering another Trijicon for the AR-15 and possibly on the 700.
I know Leupold Mark 4 and Nightforce are great scopes. I have read a lot of information on comparisons between these scopes but most of them focus on glass, internal adjustment, reticle choices, moa/mil, etc.
My main concern is turret tracking and durability. Would I gain anything in these two areas, within this price range?
Thanks for any input!
I know Leupold Mark 4 and Nightforce are great scopes. I have read a lot of information on comparisons between these scopes but most of them focus on glass, internal adjustment, reticle choices, moa/mil, etc.
My main concern is turret tracking and durability. Would I gain anything in these two areas, within this price range?
Thanks for any input!