• 1 WEEK LEFT: This Target Haunts Me Contest

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

Trump is back…the “Now What” thread

The point is even if it's 1% what are we charging them?
Something tells me zero until now.
I don't care how accurate, I care if it is one sided deal.
Everything else is smoke and mirrors.

R
It is not zero, not even President Trump contends that:

but it is lopsided in most cases. For example, EU has 10% on American cars, while we have 2.5% on EU cars (not trucks).

The EU tried to negotiate a trade deal before the tariff announcement, which would have been a lot less disruptive to the economy on both sides of The Atlantic.


Note that the EU is not a country, and its member countries do not all agree on how to handle this situation, as you can see for yourself in the article.
 
i had a personal work experience with the eu when they formed in the mid 90s.
we made some parts used by companies over there, and they put an import duty or whatever they called it that exceeded the profit margin.
so we had to lay off some people and open a factory in the uk.
that lasted until they let nitto denko build their own factory and they undercut us out of the business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theLBC


1744077273377.png
 
Last edited:

But the latest hit job on Donald Trump’s tariff policy—accusing him of “sparing” Russia while targeting Ukraine—stands out for its sheer dishonesty. It’s not just lazy. It’s willfully misleading.

The claim—explicit or implied—echoed across the New York Times, Axios, BBC, and the global peanut gallery—that Trump “spared” Russia while targeting Ukraine is more than misleading. It’s a lazy distortion at best—built to deflect attention from what’s actually happening: a long-overdue reset of U.S. trade policy that, for once, puts America’s interests first.

Let’s be clear: Russia has not been “spared.” It’s already under a battery of sanctions and trade restrictions that make any discussion of tariffs functionally moot. Under Trump and Biden, U.S. policy has effectively walled off Russian goods—sanctioning everything from energy and banking to luxury items.
 
i had a personal work experience with the eu when they formed in the mid 90s.
we made some parts used by companies over there, and they put an import duty or whatever they called it that exceeded the profit margin.
so we had to lay off some people and open a factory in the uk.
that lasted until they let nitto denko build their own factory and they undercut us out of the business.
The EU is run by mentally-deranged feminists and leftists who literally think in ideological terms, then try to force the real world to fit into those erroneous concepts. Their parliamentarians think university degrees are a meaningful skill set to managing economies, immigration, infrastructure, and resources. I’ve lived and traveled throughout Europe since the 1970s, watching this all unfold. They treat their defense ministers as enemies, and always have during the past 50 years. Poland, Finland, and Norway might be the exceptions to that.

2017:

iu


iu


Imagine the majority Socialist-Solidarist EPP and Progressive Alliance of Socialists being the biggest parties in the EU bloc, making decisions about trade and defense.

They don’t even have defense listed in their party platforms. It’s all political ideologies taught in Marxist universities, European Green New Deal trash, silly catch-phrases and stupid buzzwords from shop-keepers and women who don’t know how their own nations work.

They don’t represent Europe well at all, and have limited real-world experience even at low levels of society.

Trump negotiating with them is like a shark vs baby seals.
 
Last edited:
Never seen that one coming.
.
i hope you are wrong,but DOJ is looking a bit deep state. seeing a lot of talk,no real action on Epstein,JFK,RFK,MLK. the K stuff will take time to dig out and eval but diddy and Epstein,all we need is names to learn who the pervs are.
this guy is 1 who should have been fired and arrested on day 1. hard to see Kash promoting him. FBI went after Kash hard,so ???
Bondi has never been truly justice friendly,usually followed the deep state narrative. not sure why Desantis didn't reign her in some.
 

yup, just like duty or tariffs, i have seen this first hand when i was in manufacturing.
we sold a product to a big box store. they increased orders regularly.
when they got up to a certain amount, they toured the factory.
then they told us we had to reduce the cost, even though they were already marking up the items 400% and selling out.
our only option to lower the cost was to offshore the manual labor portions of the process, so those jobs moved to mexico.
 

yup, just like duty or tariffs, i have seen this first hand when i was in manufacturing.
we sold a product to a big box store. they increased orders regularly.
when they got up to a certain amount, they toured the factory.
then they told us we had to reduce the cost, even though they were already marking up the items 400% and selling out.
our only option to lower the cost was to offshore the manual labor portions of the process, so those jobs moved to mexico.

I'll bet despite demanding you lower cost by sending jobs overseas (there were stories of Walmart actually demanding jobs be shipped to China no matter what), they didn't lower their prices any or possibly even raised them.

Essentially corporate greed is what ruined the American economy, American jobs and the American dream.
Then somehow poor suckers are being told to "be patriotic and pay more" so that the same evil greedy bastard companies can make more fat profits?

Trump should actually go after Walmart and other companies that are responsible, but they probably pour too much money into campaigns and then also threaten "we'll fire a bunch of workers and hurt america bad if you don't give us what we want", kind of like the bankers.
 
I'll bet despite demanding you lower cost by sending jobs overseas (there were stories of Walmart actually demanding jobs be shipped to China no matter what), they didn't lower their prices any or possibly even raised them.

Essentially corporate greed is what ruined the American economy, American jobs and the American dream.
Then somehow poor suckers are being told to "be patriotic and pay more" so that the same evil greedy bastard companies can make more fat profits?

Trump should actually go after Walmart and other companies that are responsible, but they probably pour too much money into campaigns and then also threaten "we'll fire a bunch of workers and hurt america bad if you don't give us what we want", kind of like the bankers.
very true. but the greed and corruption of union workers and their corrupt leaders has to be figured in as well. they are heavily complicit in all the problems that started back in the 50s. "give us what we want or we will fuck up the work and destroy the company". both sides were heavily complicit in the whole destructive deindustrializing our economy. the complex role of the stock market and financialization of the economy are also something that needs a look. nothing simple here or fast to fix.
as far as unions are concerned,i have some experience with the role they played in the 70s or so. ie comparing my wages and union wages and performance expectations. unions have,for the most part,outlived any of the real needs there were for them in the past. Reagan did deal well with them. and,NO gov worker of ANY kind should ever be allowed ANY union memberships at all. teacher's unions are largely responsible for the dumbing down & radicalization of US students.
 


What a fucking joke, means nothing. They walk away with Billions -$$$ of profit 'tax free', still flying 1st Class, The good Christian leadership will wait, hookup with the US Government again when things are more favorable a few years from now to take in more of the Treasury Grift all under the religious umbrella of doing Gods calling with the end goal of helping whole of humanity live in equality, all Gods children living equal at their lowest common denominator... 'except' For Them.
-
 


That law is an oldie goldie from the Clinton era ... 1996

You may also be interested in hits like this one.


SEC. 2. Purpose; sense of Congress.


(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is to remove barriers to immigration status for non-citizen survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and other crimes who may be eligible for protections under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) and other vulnerable immigrants.


(j) Eliminate Civil Penalties for Failure To Depart.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r and theLBC
Why do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.
iu
 
Why do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.
Yep.

And some times sarcasm doesn't translate through text very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Malum Prohibitum
Why do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.
The increase alone would not have nearly the impact if not for expectations of reduced productivity, and therefore energy demands. It's the whole package. OPEC production is salting the wounds
 
If Putin had been able to steamroll through Ukraine, it would have presented the appearance of strategic capability to the Eastern European nations (who actually have been investing in their defense), because they still have pictures of their family members that were murdered by Russians from the last times (Winter War 1939, WWII, Hungary 1965, Czechoslovakia 1968).

The billions in US aid have mostly been older weapons stockpiles scheduled for destruction assigned a monetary value we already paid, remember? It’s actually a net-gain for us in weapons disposal, not that comrade Biden jumped on that opportunity anytime soon. There was still corruption through CIA and USAID, who have been used by NGOs for personal gain as a rule ever since JFK was assassinated. They will do that with any conflict as long as they are allowed to.

The Eastern Europeans, especially Poland, are stuck between a weak European core run by male feminists and stupid women in their parliaments....and adventurist Putin to the East. Not a good position to be in right now.

This is why Finland and Poland quickly invested so much in their national defense in the 1990s. Finland replaced their aging fleet of SAAB Drakens and MiG-21Fs with F-18C/D (not F/A-18, a side note but interesting to dive into), while Poland replaced their MiG-29s, Su-20s and Su-22Ms with F-16C/D Block 50/52s.

Meanwhile in Germany, the UK, Spain, Italy, and France, they drug their feet developing Typhoon and Rafale, which are at end-of-life relevancy for modern air combat. Now Finland and Poland are F-35 customers, looking to replace or augment their 4th Gen fleets of fighters. Because Germany never invested in a Tornado replacement, they had to order F-35s too. This was after they fired their Luftwaffe Chief many years ago when he recommended they invest in the F-35 program ASAP.

I would absolutely love to debate Col MacGregor. He’s an Army Armor officer who thinks tanks and artillery are central to modern combat power. That hasn’t been true since Korea at the latest. It shifted during WWII in favor of air power, and the US is without peer in that space.

He is painfully-uneducated about the overall US force structure, where our centers of strength are, and how we actually fight. This is especially-alarming because he was front-and-center in Desert Storm’s Battle of 73 Eastings. He was in the last war where the US military actually was let off the leash a little, so he should know, but he either doesn’t or misrepresents his statements about modern US military force structure.

You will notice though that he reverts to expressing US combat power in artillery and armor terms. These are really after-thoughts and dinosaurs left over from early 20th Century institutional inertia. While 73 Eastings was the most decisive armor victory in the history of armor warfare, F-111Fs and F-15Es could have attrited the same number of tanks in relatively short order.

The F-111F attrited more tanks than the A-10A did in Desert Storm, in 1/4 the sorties flown by A-10s. What we have nowadays are far more-capable than F-111Fs, 1980s-era F-16s, early F-15Es, and A-10s.

McGregor is not comfortable speaking on air power because it isn’t his career field, so he defaults to silly discussions about how many artillery shells we can produce and at what rates. It’s embarrassing.
for those of you obsessed with Russia's bad behavior (and yes,it has been often),try this. may have some predictive value.

 
I'll bet despite demanding you lower cost by sending jobs overseas (there were stories of Walmart actually demanding jobs be shipped to China no matter what), they didn't lower their prices any or possibly even raised them.

Essentially corporate greed is what ruined the American economy, American jobs and the American dream.
Then somehow poor suckers are being told to "be patriotic and pay more" so that the same evil greedy bastard companies can make more fat profits?

Trump should actually go after Walmart and other companies that are responsible, but they probably pour too much money into campaigns and then also threaten "we'll fire a bunch of workers and hurt america bad if you don't give us what we want", kind of like the bankers.
There's pure capitalism and crony capitalism. Corporate greed goes unchecked in crony capitalism when campaign coffers get stuffed to look the other way.
 
There's pure capitalism and crony capitalism. Corporate greed goes unchecked in crony capitalism when campaign coffers get stuffed to look the other way.
I spent years in college learning about the various forms of capitalism. Funny thing, although I learned about it I have never seen pure capitalism and exactly zero discussion on lobbyists. Imagine my surprise. The closest thing I have seen to pure capitalism is a farmers market - there isn’t a lot of GDP there so that’s probably the reason. Unless someone is trying to sell raw milk but that’s an entirely different issue.
 
Your semi psychotic screeching doesn’t suit you. Try a different approach.

You suffer from a severe case of TDS.

Seek help my friend
No screech. I replied to and countered a statement. It is the core purpose of a discussion forum. You might wanna "give it a shot" some day and try to venture beyond simplistic insults. ;)
 
Why do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.

What is our tarrif on OPEC's oil?

Maybe we could subsidise domestic production, our guys could use the work.

It is all a cesspool of smoke, mirrors and lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r
What is our tarrif on OPEC's oil?

Maybe we could subsidise domestic production, our guys could use the work.

It is all a cesspool of smoke, mirrors and lies.
If i may, As far as I am aware there are exceptions on Tariffs in oil and gas sector. Canada and mexico, which make up over 80% of US imports of oil, with OPEC as well. Saudi being 7% and Iraq being 4%.

Meaning there are none.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCP