Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!
Join contestIt is not zero, not even President Trump contends that:The point is even if it's 1% what are we charging them?
Something tells me zero until now.
I don't care how accurate, I care if it is one sided deal.
Everything else is smoke and mirrors.
R
this doesn't inspire confidence, unless it is a trap.
![]()
Kash Patel promotes an FBI agent who called J6 patriots and moms at school board meetings ‘terrorists’
If you like American Thinker’s content, please consider subscribing here for an ad-free experience and access to an exclusive, weekly newsletter offering insight from the editorial staff. Guys, I think we’ve been played. It all blew...www.americanthinker.com
there may have been some really bad guys there, but they weren't maga trump supporters.Never seen that one coming.
.
But the latest hit job on Donald Trump’s tariff policy—accusing him of “sparing” Russia while targeting Ukraine—stands out for its sheer dishonesty. It’s not just lazy. It’s willfully misleading.
The claim—explicit or implied—echoed across the New York Times, Axios, BBC, and the global peanut gallery—that Trump “spared” Russia while targeting Ukraine is more than misleading. It’s a lazy distortion at best—built to deflect attention from what’s actually happening: a long-overdue reset of U.S. trade policy that, for once, puts America’s interests first.
Let’s be clear: Russia has not been “spared.” It’s already under a battery of sanctions and trade restrictions that make any discussion of tariffs functionally moot. Under Trump and Biden, U.S. policy has effectively walled off Russian goods—sanctioning everything from energy and banking to luxury items.
The EU is run by mentally-deranged feminists and leftists who literally think in ideological terms, then try to force the real world to fit into those erroneous concepts. Their parliamentarians think university degrees are a meaningful skill set to managing economies, immigration, infrastructure, and resources. I’ve lived and traveled throughout Europe since the 1970s, watching this all unfold. They treat their defense ministers as enemies, and always have during the past 50 years. Poland, Finland, and Norway might be the exceptions to that.i had a personal work experience with the eu when they formed in the mid 90s.
we made some parts used by companies over there, and they put an import duty or whatever they called it that exceeded the profit margin.
so we had to lay off some people and open a factory in the uk.
that lasted until they let nitto denko build their own factory and they undercut us out of the business.
i hope you are wrong,but DOJ is looking a bit deep state. seeing a lot of talk,no real action on Epstein,JFK,RFK,MLK. the K stuff will take time to dig out and eval but diddy and Epstein,all we need is names to learn who the pervs are.Never seen that one coming.
.
![]()
The Wal-Mart effect: Its Chinese imports have displaced nearly 200,000 U.S. jobs
China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) was supposed to improve the U.S. trade deficit with China and create good jobs in the United States. But those promises have gone unfulfilled: the total U.S. trade deficit with China reached $235 billion in 2006. Between 2001 and 2006, this...www.epi.org
yup, just like duty or tariffs, i have seen this first hand when i was in manufacturing.
we sold a product to a big box store. they increased orders regularly.
when they got up to a certain amount, they toured the factory.
then they told us we had to reduce the cost, even though they were already marking up the items 400% and selling out.
our only option to lower the cost was to offshore the manual labor portions of the process, so those jobs moved to mexico.
very true. but the greed and corruption of union workers and their corrupt leaders has to be figured in as well. they are heavily complicit in all the problems that started back in the 50s. "give us what we want or we will fuck up the work and destroy the company". both sides were heavily complicit in the whole destructive deindustrializing our economy. the complex role of the stock market and financialization of the economy are also something that needs a look. nothing simple here or fast to fix.I'll bet despite demanding you lower cost by sending jobs overseas (there were stories of Walmart actually demanding jobs be shipped to China no matter what), they didn't lower their prices any or possibly even raised them.
Essentially corporate greed is what ruined the American economy, American jobs and the American dream.
Then somehow poor suckers are being told to "be patriotic and pay more" so that the same evil greedy bastard companies can make more fat profits?
Trump should actually go after Walmart and other companies that are responsible, but they probably pour too much money into campaigns and then also threaten "we'll fire a bunch of workers and hurt america bad if you don't give us what we want", kind of like the bankers.
US Conference Of Catholic Bishops Ends Refugee Program After USAID Funding Cut | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
SEC. 2. Purpose; sense of Congress.
(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is to remove barriers to immigration status for non-citizen survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, and other crimes who may be eligible for protections under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) and other vulnerable immigrants.
(j) Eliminate Civil Penalties for Failure To Depart.
Why do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.
Yep.Why do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.
Really? When most local production ceases due to unprofitable environment? Sounds awesome. Quite a win. From what I understand, anything much under $60 will do. Keep hoping for disaster...If gas prices go down that's a win for Trump, nobody will care if it was tariffs or not
The increase alone would not have nearly the impact if not for expectations of reduced productivity, and therefore energy demands. It's the whole package. OPEC production is salting the woundsWhy do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.
With Saudi oil paid for with US consumer money siphoned through tariffs. That Donny IS a genius. I am sure that was his plan all along.Also we have a severely depleted SPR. That would be a great thing to fill if the price tanks.
Just my opinion. Not sarcasm.
AgreedThe increase alone would not have nearly the impact if not for expectations of reduced productivity, and therefore energy demands. It's the whole package. OPEC production is salting the wounds
for those of you obsessed with Russia's bad behavior (and yes,it has been often),try this. may have some predictive value.If Putin had been able to steamroll through Ukraine, it would have presented the appearance of strategic capability to the Eastern European nations (who actually have been investing in their defense), because they still have pictures of their family members that were murdered by Russians from the last times (Winter War 1939, WWII, Hungary 1965, Czechoslovakia 1968).
The billions in US aid have mostly been older weapons stockpiles scheduled for destruction assigned a monetary value we already paid, remember? It’s actually a net-gain for us in weapons disposal, not that comrade Biden jumped on that opportunity anytime soon. There was still corruption through CIA and USAID, who have been used by NGOs for personal gain as a rule ever since JFK was assassinated. They will do that with any conflict as long as they are allowed to.
The Eastern Europeans, especially Poland, are stuck between a weak European core run by male feminists and stupid women in their parliaments....and adventurist Putin to the East. Not a good position to be in right now.
This is why Finland and Poland quickly invested so much in their national defense in the 1990s. Finland replaced their aging fleet of SAAB Drakens and MiG-21Fs with F-18C/D (not F/A-18, a side note but interesting to dive into), while Poland replaced their MiG-29s, Su-20s and Su-22Ms with F-16C/D Block 50/52s.
Meanwhile in Germany, the UK, Spain, Italy, and France, they drug their feet developing Typhoon and Rafale, which are at end-of-life relevancy for modern air combat. Now Finland and Poland are F-35 customers, looking to replace or augment their 4th Gen fleets of fighters. Because Germany never invested in a Tornado replacement, they had to order F-35s too. This was after they fired their Luftwaffe Chief many years ago when he recommended they invest in the F-35 program ASAP.
I would absolutely love to debate Col MacGregor. He’s an Army Armor officer who thinks tanks and artillery are central to modern combat power. That hasn’t been true since Korea at the latest. It shifted during WWII in favor of air power, and the US is without peer in that space.
He is painfully-uneducated about the overall US force structure, where our centers of strength are, and how we actually fight. This is especially-alarming because he was front-and-center in Desert Storm’s Battle of 73 Eastings. He was in the last war where the US military actually was let off the leash a little, so he should know, but he either doesn’t or misrepresents his statements about modern US military force structure.
You will notice though that he reverts to expressing US combat power in artillery and armor terms. These are really after-thoughts and dinosaurs left over from early 20th Century institutional inertia. While 73 Eastings was the most decisive armor victory in the history of armor warfare, F-111Fs and F-15Es could have attrited the same number of tanks in relatively short order.
The F-111F attrited more tanks than the A-10A did in Desert Storm, in 1/4 the sorties flown by A-10s. What we have nowadays are far more-capable than F-111Fs, 1980s-era F-16s, early F-15Es, and A-10s.
McGregor is not comfortable speaking on air power because it isn’t his career field, so he defaults to silly discussions about how many artillery shells we can produce and at what rates. It’s embarrassing.
There's pure capitalism and crony capitalism. Corporate greed goes unchecked in crony capitalism when campaign coffers get stuffed to look the other way.I'll bet despite demanding you lower cost by sending jobs overseas (there were stories of Walmart actually demanding jobs be shipped to China no matter what), they didn't lower their prices any or possibly even raised them.
Essentially corporate greed is what ruined the American economy, American jobs and the American dream.
Then somehow poor suckers are being told to "be patriotic and pay more" so that the same evil greedy bastard companies can make more fat profits?
Trump should actually go after Walmart and other companies that are responsible, but they probably pour too much money into campaigns and then also threaten "we'll fire a bunch of workers and hurt america bad if you don't give us what we want", kind of like the bankers.
I spent years in college learning about the various forms of capitalism. Funny thing, although I learned about it I have never seen pure capitalism and exactly zero discussion on lobbyists. Imagine my surprise. The closest thing I have seen to pure capitalism is a farmers market - there isn’t a lot of GDP there so that’s probably the reason. Unless someone is trying to sell raw milk but that’s an entirely different issue.There's pure capitalism and crony capitalism. Corporate greed goes unchecked in crony capitalism when campaign coffers get stuffed to look the other way.
Your semi psychotic screeching doesn’t suit you. Try a different approach.With Saudi oil paid for with US consumer money siphoned through tariffs. That Donny IS a genius. I am sure that was his plan all along.
No screech. I replied to and countered a statement. It is the core purpose of a discussion forum. You might wanna "give it a shot" some day and try to venture beyond simplistic insults.Your semi psychotic screeching doesn’t suit you. Try a different approach.
You suffer from a severe case of TDS.
Seek help my friend
countered what exactly.No screech. I replied to and countered a statement. It is the core purpose of a discussion forum. You might wanna "give it a shot" some day and try to venture beyond simplistic insults.![]()
Why do you say it has nothing to do with OPEC increasing production? It has everything to do with that - 400,000 barrels a day increase, implemented way ahead of plan. OPEC wants oil too cheap for US producers to drill, baby, drill. OPEC will cut back supply again once another Democrat is in the White House.
If i may, As far as I am aware there are exceptions on Tariffs in oil and gas sector. Canada and mexico, which make up over 80% of US imports of oil, with OPEC as well. Saudi being 7% and Iraq being 4%.What is our tarrif on OPEC's oil?
Maybe we could subsidise domestic production, our guys could use the work.
It is all a cesspool of smoke, mirrors and lies.