Sorry, I assume some level of knowledge of our political system
In general it does not exist. Most people aren't even aware of the constitution or bill of rights beyond "we the peepuh", "I can say what I want", "muh guns" and "you can't make me".
Knowledge of the powers and limitations of the three branches? Watch some videos, there is a huge portion of the population that doesn't even understand there are three branches and think the are House, Senate and POTUS or States, Congress and POTUS are the branches.
Most fanatical "liberals" I meet believe the FED should have all the power to force the states to all be the same and POTUS should have the power to make treaties all by hisself ... but only when a liberal is in power. Most fanatical "conservatives" I meet believe the FED should have very little power because they seem to think all the states are the same already and the POTUS should have the power to do everything they *think* Trump is doing now ... but only when a "conservative" is in power.
No, a working knowledge of the political system is not pervasive in our society or even on gun forums.
It seemed to not question this instance only, but in general. Which begs the question:
"So Trump does not need to obey any laws?"
Excuses, excuses, excuses.
The context was most definitely "this instance" so choosing not address "this instance" in the answer is just lazy pigheadedness.
You could have provided some details about exactly which parts of Trump's EO the judge had an issue with and which parts she decided to let stand. But, no.
You didn't even attempt to provide any kind of any part of an answer at all. You just deflected. Selfish. Weak. Pathetic.
See how that works? But thanks for making a lame attempt at speaking for others. I guess.
And not even answering the question. Actually, either one.
I wasn't speaking for anyone else. I was addressing you directly about your "answer". The original question about Trump dodging judges decisions was directed at you. I wouldn't presume to answer that on your behalf and deny you the privilege of demonstrating your superior mental prowess.
Do you mean your question about anything wrong with congress appointing judges? I took it as more deflection but if you really don't know and need me to answer it for you that's another clause in the constitution.
Other than the question you did not ask about Trump dodging judges decisions and the one about congress appointing judges you only recently asked a question about the functionality of your conversational tactics with regard to whether or not they work. They don't.
Was there another question?
ETA: I spotted another one about Trump obeying laws. Apologies for missing it, I assumed it was more deflection but in case it's actual ignorance I'll give it a go.
Trump does not obey laws?
Obviously not all the laws, I mean, who does.
And, in general, without disobedience laws don't get tested.
Parks, Mandela, Gandhi, Susan B Anthony, any number of revolutionists ... all chose not to follow laws and influenced change toward what we have today and generally consider "better" than before.
Do you honestly not understand how this works? That laws and even the constitution must be tested from time to time to facilitate change. Or is it just more deflection?
BTW, I heard the SAVE Act has passed the House which supposedly will require proof of citizenship to vote and maybe some other stuff.
