Re: Vortex Razor quality?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 427Cobra</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I looked the one Lowlight reviewed, after adjusting it to my eyes I thought the glass was the same as my NF, I really liked the reticle, the little fiber optic rods are a nice touch too, but Vortex has the same problem Leupold and Bushnell have, they sell crap and they sell good, how do you know what your getting, just because it says Vortex on the side doesn't mean your getting the same quaility\value\whatever, they need(Leupold Bushnell and Vortex) to rebrand there products to reflect a difference. </div></div>
Brian -
I'm no marketing expert, but I feel like they ARE doing a fine job of re-branding their "tactical" product lines. There is a concerted effort within Vortex, it seems, to differentiate their Razor and PST products from their more traditional hunting products. One needs to look no further than their sponsorship of tactical matches (three gun and practical rifle), their relationship with Jerry Miculek, and their dedicated website to tactical shooting products.
Heck, I shot next to Scott with Vortex at the Bash...I haven't seen any Leupold reps actively engaged in these matches. Scott's a hell of a nice guy, and a great representative for their tactical products.
My .02 cents.
Thanks,
Josh