Wait, are you saying that...Hi,
LOLOLOL not like he should not have already pinned his choices down to the top 3. Acting as if he has all the time in the world.......
What the hell? That shit works for trivial matters that people wouldn't have cared about anyways. It's not like the left will close their browsers around noon on Friday, have a few drinks over the weekend, and forget all about the matter come Monday morning.Why announce on Monday and give the opposition all week to berate you? Announce on Friday afternoon or Saturday when the plebes are preoccupied with living their lives and not glued to mainstream media. Old(er) news by Monday morning...
We will have a nominee likely Friday afternoon.Wait, are you saying that...
1) ... he should have been prepared for RBG's death for, like, his entire fucking term of office? She was an 87-year-old cancer patient. It's not like this could have been expected.
2) ... the clock is ticking? There are more than 40 days until the election, and the Senate is notorious for moving quickly on important issues.
Just another foreigner coming into the Pit to agitate.
In all seriousness, it's my understanding that there is a desire to hold off on naming the nominee until after the end of memorial services. But if that's the case, then say it that way; don't be pretending like there is still an ongoing selection process, because if there is, then that's a sign of blatant incompetence. This is not the time to be pretending as if there is some sort of nuanced decision making.
The 80% that matter are neither left nor right, and do close their browsers on Friday afternoon. Meanwhile the rabid left will be flailing at air with fewer viewers tuned in.What the hell? That shit works for trivial matters that people wouldn't have cared about anyways. It's not like the left will close their browsers around noon on Friday, have a few drinks over the weekend, and forget all about the matter come Monday morning.
Can you give us the executive summary. I don’t have time to watch 2 hours of somebody who starts off talking to his kids.I watched this today....this does not put barret in that good of a light..warning its long... about 1:24 mins it starts talking about barret and the some of the others.
That's a big assumption. I don't know of anything that supports her being an immigration patriot. I think she offered some free legal help to keep illian gonzalas (have no clue how to spell that) in the US. She sure did get a lot of dem support for her fed confirmation, which tells me a lot.maybe, but a latina judge voting with the constitution on immigration matters will poke the liberals in their race-baiting eyes.
A more nuanced view is that "the biden rule" only applies to presidents not up for re-election- you know, actually in the last year of their presidency...My guess is he goes with Lagoa. I would prefer Barrett just because she has more of a record.
I wish McConnell and Graham weren't full of shit back in 2016. They said a judge shouldn't be nominated in the last year of presidency and that's why they weren't going forward with a vote on Garland. Why lie? The senate has no obligation to confirm any judge the president names. If they don't like the judge, they can reject them.
The truth was that republicans held the senate and they weren't going to like anyone Obama put forward so holding a vote was a waste of time. That's a completely defensible position. What's not defensible is pointing to a standard that has never actually been upheld and saying that's why they can't have a vote.
Instead they picked the stupid way out and now they're catching all the hypocrisy shit.
Puh-lease. They'll find some effeminate staffer she- allegedly- winked at, once. He'll be the newer, stronger, more empowered face of Me[n] Too...My money is on Amy Coney Barrett, which is a solid voice and will also take away the stupid “MeToo” narrative that the left would use were a man nominated.
And they’ll be mocked out of the room. My guess is that they bash her because she’s Catholic, which will blatantly reveal the Left’s anti-religious bias, further alienating moderates.Puh-lease. They'll find some effeminate staffer she- allegedly- winked at, once. He'll be the newer, stronger, more empowered face of Me Too...
If there is anyone still teetering on the fence even considering voting for some criminally corrupt, senile, child predator, that isn't a moderate, thats a mentally defective scumbag.And they’ll be mocked out of the room. My guess is that they bash her because she’s Catholic, which will blatantly reveal the Left’s anti-religious bias, further alienating moderates.
It’s a win-win for us.
Yup now I get it. The campaign song was a preview poke in the eye for the TDS snowflake crowd: "...You can't always get what you waaaaaaant..." LOL! Play it again Don! Just to let 'em know what they'll get as a replacement for their beloved RBG.Seriously ?????? Her dying wish ??? WHO GIVE A FUCK ?? HAHAHAHA
i also wish i had more hair but we don't always get what we wanted.
If there is anyone still teetering on the fence even considering voting for some criminally corrupt, senile, child predator, that isn't a moderate, thats a mentally defective scumbag.
That vile cockisucker has absolutely no redeeming qualities that should keep him out of prison much less worthy of a vote against what is probably the greatest president since Washington.