Re: What's the scoop on the PST?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: palmik</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: AJBello</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I've been keeping an eye out for PST review threads on here. I've pretty much decided I want one but still am a little cautious about throwing down the money without getting to look through one. I haven't seen much said about the glass, good or bad. As long as they're the equivalent of a Mk4 in that arena then I'm sold, good enough for me for the price. Would still really love to see some side by side pictures of a PST and a Mk4, maybe even a NXS thrown in for good measure...
... now if I could just find a 6-24 FFP mrad in stock...</div></div>
I'd say that the glass is just as good as a MK4 if not a little better, but I don't want to get ahead of myself </div></div>
I would have to agree. Just my opinion, but I compared my 2.5-10 and 4-16x50 FFP to a Leupy Mk4 6.5-20. I really didn't see any difference as far as glass with all three at 10x. I will say that the Mk4 has been a very good scope for me, at least as far as durability. I've not had the problems with it that many have had (perhaps I got lucky). To me, durability is the one thing yet to be proven from the PST's, and it's just too early to tell.