Re: Which brass is better...?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BuzzBoss915</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is a bit of herd mentality going on here. Apparently Lapua is the only brand worthy, and everything else is junk? I started handloading before anybody ever heard of Nosler, Hornady, Norma or Lapua. Either RP or WW were perfectly acceptable and I didn't see a lot of Federal, especially in unprimed brass.
I have some excellent RP brass, some excellent WW, excellent Nosler and excellent PMC that I use in precision rifles and I trust the brass. I also use Lapua in calibers that are available. I don't know where this junk stuff is coming from but I assume there is some of it out there? In over 40 years, I have never seen offcentered flash holes and never seen cases that were unusable, for varmints or target application. But, I see a lot of advice, (okay, some advice) to throw away cases as junk and I don't get it? Maybe one day I will buy some of this junk. I hope so because right now, I'm feeling left out.
Good hunting. BB
(remember, you aren't supposed to flame the new guys) (even if they deserve it)
</div></div>
I can't speak for RP, but I have shot a lot of FGMM, which uses Federal, and Black Hills, which uses WW. I can tell the difference between Lapua and the other two by looking at flash holes. Does the drilled flash hole lead to better accuracy? Who knows, but I have definitely seen burrs in WW and Federal. In some cases, the burrs were actually obstructing the flash hole to some degree. All this can be fixed with a flash hole deburrer. I would rather pay the extra money and not worry about that. Also, there is a lot more neck wall thickness variation in WW and Federal than in Lapua.
All that said, in an AR, who cares? In a bolt gun, where you are getting 15+ loadings per peice of brass, brass is the cheapest component. In an AR, the shorter brass life makes the brass much more expensive. I would go with whatever just as long as the stamp is the same.