i'm torn between 3 glocks, i'm going to be using said pistol for 3 gun, general shooting and plinking, perhaps some pistol competition and probably a car gun/side arm during hurricane season(the weather during that time can rust most pistols pretty quick)if any of the 3 are better suppressed, that would also be nice to know. the 3 follow
glock 34
glock 35
and glock 21 sf
3 different guns, 3 different calibers. my reasoning behind each. of course i like that all are rugged, easy to maintain, and seem to not be as adversely effected by the weather down here as some, i do wish glock has second strike capability, but i'm willing to over look that due to cost and cheap plentiful parts.
glock 21 sf, i like it, like the 45 acp round. but i'd like a longer barrel and the last 21 i had didn't like reloads(bummer). this pistol also has the lowest capacity, which isn't a prime concern, but a factor none the less
glock 35, i've had 40 s&w, i've got a buddy that swaps the 40 barrel for 9mm with no problems, but i had a glock armorer tell me that could damage the gun?? i figure you can so that would allow for a few calibers in this one gun. not set up to reload 40 s&w but i could be and ammo tends to be cheaper than 45 acp. 15 round capacity isn't shabby
glock 34, 9mm is cheap cheap to shoot, 17 rounds of anything would ruin any bad guys day, much less good expanding 9mm hp rounds however i do like the 40 and 45 for a man stopper.
which would you choose? all 3 feel pretty good, i just feel i'm missing something. let me know what you fellas think
glock 34
glock 35
and glock 21 sf
3 different guns, 3 different calibers. my reasoning behind each. of course i like that all are rugged, easy to maintain, and seem to not be as adversely effected by the weather down here as some, i do wish glock has second strike capability, but i'm willing to over look that due to cost and cheap plentiful parts.
glock 21 sf, i like it, like the 45 acp round. but i'd like a longer barrel and the last 21 i had didn't like reloads(bummer). this pistol also has the lowest capacity, which isn't a prime concern, but a factor none the less
glock 35, i've had 40 s&w, i've got a buddy that swaps the 40 barrel for 9mm with no problems, but i had a glock armorer tell me that could damage the gun?? i figure you can so that would allow for a few calibers in this one gun. not set up to reload 40 s&w but i could be and ammo tends to be cheaper than 45 acp. 15 round capacity isn't shabby
glock 34, 9mm is cheap cheap to shoot, 17 rounds of anything would ruin any bad guys day, much less good expanding 9mm hp rounds however i do like the 40 and 45 for a man stopper.
which would you choose? all 3 feel pretty good, i just feel i'm missing something. let me know what you fellas think