Re: XBR -is it worth the trouble of changing?
it has very small granules, slightly larger than benchmark or H322, it should meter well. as far as being "accurate", it might be for me but not for you- depends on how persistant and thorough your load development is. If TAC works for you then stick with it, dont change just for the sake of changing
it has very small granules, slightly larger than benchmark or H322, it should meter well. as far as being "accurate", it might be for me but not for you- depends on how persistant and thorough your load development is. If TAC works for you then stick with it, dont change just for the sake of changing
Re: XBR -is it worth the trouble of changing?
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthre...rue#Post2205419
Can tell you that I am getting .1 grain variance from the polished (notorious) dillon thrower. Was concerned before, but not now.
http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthre...rue#Post2205419
Can tell you that I am getting .1 grain variance from the polished (notorious) dillon thrower. Was concerned before, but not now.
B
bubbapug1
Guest
Re: XBR -is it worth the trouble of changing?
I am getting very little if any variance from my dillon on TAC if the vibrations from shell to shell are similar, but if I bang the machine a bit more from case to case the variance can be as much as 0.2, but its less than you would see with reloader 15.
TAC is already very dense, and the chances for bridging I think are less is its more uniform and packs tigher with less vibration, so the initial charge has a better chance of being spot on.
Just my theoretical opinion.
I am getting very little if any variance from my dillon on TAC if the vibrations from shell to shell are similar, but if I bang the machine a bit more from case to case the variance can be as much as 0.2, but its less than you would see with reloader 15.
TAC is already very dense, and the chances for bridging I think are less is its more uniform and packs tigher with less vibration, so the initial charge has a better chance of being spot on.
Just my theoretical opinion.
