• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

A murder case but something ain't right

Get it Kristi Noem… she killed her dog. Just like the homeowners did at the house. Their dog just suddenly disappeared during the death investigation. The dog had history of attacking people. O’Keefe had what looked like bite marks on his arms.
 
Last edited:
Ba,Ha,ha!

I knew Bukake (Buhkenik)

I sat next to him at a meeting after the mandate was announced and he gave a stirring speech about how the mandates were the path to communism. He having lived in the Ukraine as a young boy would be able to see it.

The kid other side of him also gave a Sam Adams worthy speech - he didn’t fold - almost lost his family when he was going to be discharged from the Coast Guard and have zero income, like the vaccinated Trooper that died of stroke this week.

Happy neither he or I got Bukake on us.

You can take the Ukrainian out of the Ukraine but they will still be duplicitous sons of bitches.

Buhkenik Folded and took the shot like a cheap lawn chair.

This is classic.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shoreglide, 6.5SH, Emerson0311 and 1 other person
Makinchips208 said:
This has to have been the worst ‘investigation’ in the history of investigations.
Click to expand...
I woukd say yes. If it was not for the murder investigation they had here for a lady who killed one of my friends brothers. The judge actually told the cops next time someone gets murdered they need to call in a team of detectives from somewhere else to investigate the scene. It was the second time a man turned up strangled in her house. She said ir was self defense because he was bearing her. When the police arrived he was dead on the couch with extention cord wrapped around his neck six times. He passed out and she wrapped a cord around his neck and strangled him.
 
So nobody can get (or keep)their stories straight.

Everybody drinks all the time and drives around in snow storms drunk?

One of the guys texts in a group thread “tell them the guy never went in the house”.

ATF agent involved from the getgo, possibly commits a felony by using federal resources to selectively pull evidence off his phone?

ATF agent throws phone away on Military base AFTER court order to not alter or destroy the phone?

Security camera footage of when Karen Read’s car is brought into the sally port is now missing?

When the car is brought into the sally port many hours later, the blood evidence (in solo cups in the ‘stop and shop’ bag) is now (or still?) on the floor of the sally port, sitting behind the accused’s car?

How would one keep track of all the things done wrong in this coverup/case?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: patscrazy and NoDopes
pmclaine said:
Click to expand...

I was wondering why the prosecution would do that. Or maybe the camera is mirrored in the original, I have seen that before.
But why not make it clear to the jury???

Only thing I can come to is the prosecution wanted to give the illusion that the ‘back right’ tail light was not messed with in the sally port.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: NoDopes
Makinchips208 said:
I was wondering why the prosecution would do that. Or maybe the camera is mirrored in the original, I have seen that before.
But why not make it clear to the jury???

Only thing I can come to is the prosecution wanted to give the illusion that the ‘back right’ tail light was not messed with in the sally port.
Click to expand...
I know a laptop camera in a zoom meeting or such will reverse images.

Unsure why a surveillance camera would though.

I think there was commentary regarding the time stamping on the video also being reversed - site an image may reverse but it would not be expected that the time stamping be imprinted also reversed.

In addition to the reversals there appears to be “edits”.

It seems too amateur to be legit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makinchips208
Longshot231 said:
If her last name was Kennedy she would have never been charged.
Click to expand...
If their last name was Kennedy- they'd likely be re-evaluating their life insurance policies because the majority of that family has been in ruins for the past 6 decades or so. Somewhere I've got a commemorative zippo for the Kennedy presidential campaign that's never been used & still its original box which my Aunt gave me- who knows, maybe it'll be a collectible in another couple of decades.

Not sure if I saw it posted here on the Hide but I believe the anniversary of Bobby Kennedy's assassination was last week. Don't really have a point in this post other than to mention that the 1960's saw a lot of turmoil but it was a different country back then. Compared to 2024- it'd likely be unrecognizable by today's standards.

-LD
 
LuckyDuck said:
If their last name was Kennedy- they'd likely be re-evaluating their life insurance policies because the majority of that family has been in ruins for the past 6 decades or so. Somewhere I've got a commemorative zippo for the Kennedy presidential campaign that's never been used & still its original box which my Aunt gave me- who knows, maybe it'll be a collectible in another couple of decades.

Not sure if I saw it posted here on the Hide but I believe the anniversary of Bobby Kennedy's assassination was last week. Don't really have a point in this post other than to mention that the 1960's saw a lot of turmoil but it was a different country back then. Compared to 2024- it'd likely be unrecognizable by today's standards.

-LD
Click to expand...

ANTIFA, BLM, Palestinian protestors and Fauci worshipers are just recycled hippies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LuckyDuck
pmclaine said:
This has more local interest, for me i have a personal interest, something seems foul here.

Could be Occams Razor but if this goes the sideways it could, this will be national.

It's got a body, a woman, a journalist, intrigue, conspiracy, FBI, inter agency scores to settle going back to Whitey Bulger, a rogue Trooper, filled in swimming pools, remodeled basements, disappearing dogs, cell phones destroyed Clinton style or perhaps it's just a guy that got hit by a car driven by crazy.

You can say you saw it here first.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Karen Read trial witness admits her cop boyfriend could've been bashed

Karen Read, 44, is on trial in Norfolk Superior Court, south of Boston, claiming she was framed for the murder of John O'Keefe, a 16-year Boston cop, by police as part of a vast conspiracy.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

This just skims the surface. Way more detail that isn't being mentioned.
Click to expand...
Mass holes
 
pmclaine said:
Click to expand...


It's a tried and proven tactic. Notice that during the cross examination, the defense attorney is quoting the officer with the statements he probably knew that would be objected to and sustained.

Yet he did it anyway and didn't argue when the objections were sustained. He didn't have to because the Jury heard it and won't be able to put it out of there mind.

IMHO, the judge went too far in trying to protect the cop by sustaining the prosecutor's objections. The defense was merely quoting the cop; showing a bias and that he did not perform an objective investigation.

Nevertheless, the defense was able to destroy the crooked cop.

To a certain extent, prosecutors use the same tactic with illegally seized or tainted evidence. The defense will object but is overruled. During appeal the appellate court will say that it was "harmless error," and that the other evidence would have been enough to convict. Most of the time, that illegally seized or tainted evidence was the difference between acquittal and conviction but the judges don't care.

IMHO, there are too many "harmless error" rulings at the appellate level. It's nice to see this tactic used against crooked cops and prosecutors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shoreglide
Longshot231 said:
It's a tried and proven tactic. Notice that during the cross examination, the defense attorney is quoting the officer with the statements he probably knew that would be objected to and sustained.

Yet he did it anyway and didn't argue when the objections were sustained. He didn't have to because the Jury heard it and won't be able to put it out of there mind.

IMHO, the judge went too far in trying to protect the cop by sustaining the prosecutor's objections. The defense was merely quoting the cop; showing a bias and that he did not perform an objective investigation.

Nevertheless, the defense was able to destroy the crooked cop.

To a certain extent, prosecutors use the same tactic with illegally seized or tainted evidence. The defense will object but is overruled. During appeal the appellate court will say that it was "harmless error," and that the other evidence would have been enough to convict. Most of the time, that illegally seized or tainted evidence was the difference between acquittal and conviction but the judges don't care.

IMHO, there are too many "harmless error" rulings at the appellate level. It's nice to see this tactic used against crooked cops and prosecutors.
Click to expand...
The rules the judge has allowed are nuts.

Neither council has to state the grounds of their objection.

Prosecution just objects anytime they are taking a beating and they don’t have to state why as in “Objection! Hearsay!”

The judge must be a mind reader to know absolutely why they are objecting but for lay people they must be like “What was that about?”
 
  • Like
Reactions: EddieNFL and Longshot231
pmclaine said:
The rules the judge has allowed are nuts.

Neither council has to state the grounds of their objection.

Prosecution just objects anytime they are taking a beating and they don’t have to state why as in “Objection! Hearsay!”

The judge must be a mind reader to know absolutely why they are objecting but for lay people they must be like “What was that about?”
Click to expand...

You said it a little better than I could. The judge is supposed to abide by the rules of criminal procedure for that state. However, judges will violate the rules as often as Hunter Biden lights a crack pipe.

The judges will apply the rules to one side and not the other. The appellate courts will also claim to give trial court judges a lot of "discretion" like those dishonest turds are the sole arbiters of truth.

I use to be a very pro-death-penalty person. Yet, after what I've seen the lies and crooked games that lawyers and judges play I'm the complete opposite now.

I've read about too many cases where a person is sentenced to death, only to be discovered later that the judge or, more often, the prosecutor and/or cops did something underhanded.

Based on that idiot's testimony under the cross-examination I would vote to acquit if I were on the jury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patscrazy, Shoreglide and EddieNFL
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back