Firearms Kimber LW 1911 45ACP
- Buy - Sell - Trade
- 32 Replies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it was formed in an effort to destroy cultures,nationality,economies and put a globalist agenda in to maintain with force.I honestly don't know how many tangible benefits most of the EU member countries are gaining from the existence of that "union".
On the surface it was supposed to give everyone more leverage in the world markets with their collective buying and selling economies as well as a more cohesive military co-op.
From what I can tell every member country has simple lost more of their unique heritage and culture in the process while gaining none of the promised benefits.
Seemingly only the highbrow leadership that is constantly on the world stage seems to keep promoting the existence of the EU.
After all, that is their only claim to fame and by default, the power that comes with that appointed position. So basically, those elites can sniff each others ass like dogs, pat each other's backs for a job well meant and go to sleep each night thinking that they accomplished something great.
I think (and sincerely hope) that once the EU crumbles, most member countries that consider themselves worth saving will revert back to a focused strategy that best suits their own stability and prosperity.
It is after all, totally possible to be friends and allies without having to wear the same color underwear and adopt the same fucking currency.
Gotcha, I have plenty of both. Shoot an email to [email protected] and I’ll get you squared away. All I need is address and phone number.Both right bolt, right ejection
I honestly don't know how many tangible benefits most of the EU member countries are gaining from the existence of that "union".Yep, my only concern is how much fallout/collateral damage the individual "member" contries might suffer from if/when it happens.
pretty much true. i guess my prob with all of our mil posturing and involvement goes back to the economy and deficit.Our history is actually quite rich in that, a fact that would be very hard to dispute.
In the context of the Ukraine crisis, American foreign policy has significantly increased the existential threat to Moscow, making the need for Russia to prevail a bitter pill to swallow - a reality accepted by neither America nor its Western European allies. This dynamic creates a dangerous situation where, if Russia begins to lose, it might resort to nuclear weapons to salvage the situation. Historically, during the Cold War, NATO had similar plans to use nuclear weapons if conventional forces were overwhelmed.
Another instance is Iran. Iran's nuclear ambitions are largely driven by a rational desire for deterrence, given its perception of being in the crosshairs of the United States and Israel. A military strike would likely fail to permanently dismantle Iran's nuclear program, as Tehran could rebuild its facilities with greater secrecy and fortification - the results would probably speak for themselves at this point. This could also push Iran to forge stronger ties with major powers like Russia and China, which would be detrimental to U.S. strategic interests.
In the spirit of our beloved 2nd Amendment along with Robert Heinlein’s "an armed society is a polite society" quote - one might even argue that every sovereign territory should possess some form of nuclear deterrent, as crazy as it may sound.
"It's a numbers game, 20 bucks is 20 bucks X 1,000. That Generator shed isn't going to build itself"
"work smarter not harder. 4 Glory Holes with a bottled fed calf on the other side is a winner"
......![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Both right bolt, right ejectionAnd I’m assuming right handed?
MB
Never had one not ignite and no more feeding issues than any other ammo. Eley worked fine for me.
I have an inventory of Receiver Wrenches for each generation of receiver, right and left hand. Which action do you have?
MB
Both of these are Supreme Court material. Wouldn't be surprised to see it go that way. That's what I was alluding to. Just because I don't like what someone says doesn't give me the right to stop them. The long term and unanticipated consequences of these instances are bad for everyone.More importantly, how did this law even get passed?