• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Chronicling all the optics that have failed me

HKslave

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Apr 4, 2022
197
184
NC
I see alot of posters come aboard to ask questions about optics on their long range guns as scopes and mounts will always be a weak point for a rifle set up no matter the amount of money spent. For this reason I have decided to chronicle all the optics and mounts that have failed me or caused some kind of problem over recent years. Some may not believe my accounts, but it seems like if there is a problem that can happen, it will happen to me, no matter the cost of the optic or mount.

I hope this helps somebody who is considering any of these products.

1.Burris AR 332- set up on an el cheapo 300 blackout ar pistol that was made to be a truck gun. Shot 9 inch groups at 20 yds. Never cared to find out if it was the gun or the optic. Sold them back to the store.

2. Aimpoint T2 KAC night vision height mount- set up on an FN 15 rifle. POI would shift back and forth between high right and low left if it got bumped. Turned out to be the KAC mount had faulty screws. It has been permanently shelved.

*The LWRC M6A2 6.8spc* this rifle gets its own section because it was like a magnet for defective products.

4. It started with a vortex viper pst lpvo in a WARNE XSKEL mount. Would not hold zero. Disassembled the mount. The screw inserts were not thread locked in
properly after being examined by a warne tech; they said it was defective.

5. On to warne mount #2, same optic. It slowly rattled itself apart on a lead sled and once again the optic would not hold zero. Same tech said this mount was fine,
their mounts were just not rated for lead sleds. Weak sauce.

6. Ditched the lpvo that required a separate mount. got an ACOG. The torqued down thumb screws (done by a qualified armorer, whose work i double checked) rattled loose on a 556 rifle after 20 rounds and lost zero. Promptly returned it to the dealer.

7. Finally settled on a different ACOG with a bobro throw lever mount for the original intention of using with a clip on thermal. This ACOG worked fine. Chose a BURRIS BTC 50 thermal. Worked great functionally, EXCEPT for the fact that the thermals mount was non-adjustable, and could not be properly calibrated to line up columnized with the day optic, to which BURRIS technicians said there was nothing they could do about. I now no longer buy, support, or recommend Burris products to anyone. Period. YMMV

Back to everything else.

8. Had a SIG ROMEO 8 red dot on a STAG 3 gun elite match rifle. Rifle had shot awesome groups with other red dots, but the Romeo 8 never seemed to hold repeatable groups like anything else even though the 8 is supposed to be SIG's high end made in america red dot that got a military contract. Sold the red dot back to the dealer used.

Aaaaaand finally,

The SCAR 17. Ive started a couple threads about this rifle as it is my most recent gun id planned to use optics instead of irons on and it is definitely a BIG bag of problems.

9. Started out with a vortex diamondback tactical and an A.R.M.S #72 30mm mount. The scope worked fine but would not fit in the mount, and this is the only mount ive ever had problems with getting a scope base to clear the bottom. Demerit to A.R.M.S.

10. Traded the vortex for an SWFA SS 12x which did fit the A.R.M.S mount (which i really wanted to use). After all that trouble, i finally got the rifle out to shoot and zeroed it, only to find that by the time I had moved back to further distances, when I went to adjust the elevation turret, the set screws that hold the caps on had come loose, so i messed up my zero by turning the turrets back and forth without hearing clicks every time until I realized what was going on.

This was INCREDIBLY frustrating. I then debated if I should keep going with this set up. I took the A.R.M.S qd #72 mount off with the scope still attached, and noticed that not only had the scope caps come loose, but the mount's throw lever locking screw had loosened almost to the point of falling off.

I then decided that it was no longer worth the time, effort, or money to continue pursuing this setup on my SCAR, and that even though it was likely the rifles fault for rattling everything loose, I am still disapointed in both SWFA and ARMS for having products that were supposed to be rated for the SCAR AS STATED by their technicians I spoke with, but clearly arent so capable.

**side note: after all this tomfoolery, i then discovered that my SCAR has a canted barrel, which fills me with inexpressible rage, as I now have a $3000 rifle that I can only use with irons, which has no practical value to me any more than being a novelty at this point.

SO, there you have it. I hope this helps someone else avoid having some of the same problems I did. I have many rifles with optics that have worked out great for me, but these are all the ones over the last year or so that have been giant turds. Do what you will with this information.
 
My issues have been Vortex Vipers.

But before we start this shit show to come,

Every optic brand fails- From center point to ZCO

Every weapon can fail- Glock to AI

Now back to our regularly scheduled program
2ED0C9EA-69B1-47E9-A524-8B83C89AE1EB.gif
 
My issues have been Vortex Vipers.

But before we start this shit show to come,

Every optic brand fails- From center point to ZCO

Every weapon can fail- Glock to AI

Now back to our regularly scheduled program
View attachment 7850485
As garandthumb would say "the comments are a little tame right now......"
 
I really wouldn't know where to begin, your a few days into membership and you decided to start a massive 5 page abortion of a thread that has so many fuckin holes in it it's rediculous. So you started the thread to help others avoid the same problems but you have no idea where most of the problems were coming from.

Never cared to find out if it was the gun or the optic. Sold them back to the store.

The screw inserts were not thread locked in
properly after being examined by a warne tech

It slowly rattled itself apart on a lead sled and once again the optic would not hold zero

I could go on and on but 90% looks like improperly installed equipment, user error, or cheap shit in general.
 
I really wouldn't know where to begin, your a few days into membership and you decided to start a massive 5 page abortion of a thread that has so many fuckin holes in it it's rediculous. So you started the thread to help others avoid the same problems but you have no idea where most of the problems were coming from.

Never cared to find out if it was the gun or the optic. Sold them back to the store.

The screw inserts were not thread locked in
properly after being examined by a warne tech

It slowly rattled itself apart on a lead sled and once again the optic would not hold zero

I could go on and on but 90% looks like improperly installed equipment, user error, or cheap shit in general.
Upon joining, it really didnt look like most of the threads on the site as a whole get many replys. every once in a while an employee from one of said companies happens to be on a forum and chimes in with an explanation for one of said problems on said "abortion" of a thread. Btw this is %100 a shitpost not an essay writing contest.
 
I really wouldn't know where to begin, your a few days into membership and you decided to start a massive 5 page abortion of a thread that has so many fuckin holes in it it's rediculous. So you started the thread to help others avoid the same problems but you have no idea where most of the problems were coming from.

Never cared to find out if it was the gun or the optic. Sold them back to the store.

The screw inserts were not thread locked in
properly after being examined by a warne tech

It slowly rattled itself apart on a lead sled and once again the optic would not hold zero

I could go on and on but 90% looks like improperly installed equipment, user error, or cheap shit in general.
BTW you could have done a better job of roasting me if you came up with something that was funny.
 
Not sure if you’re aware or not, but the 100 post count doesn’t give you px posting access. You have to pay. Kind of thinking that’s what you’re going for here.
 
Not sure if you’re aware or not, but the 100 post count doesn’t give you px posting access. You have to pay. Kind of thinking that’s what you’re going for here.
no, I actually read the rules. Why, do you want to buy some broke stuff off me?
 
I read you f’d up running the turrets on a SWFA fixed power and quit reading. Probably the easiest scope to run on planet earth.

You should stay away from firearms. Them are dangerous.

I see alot of posters come aboard to ask questions about optics on their long range guns as scopes and mounts will always be a weak point for a rifle set up no matter the amount of money spent. For this reason I have decided to chronicle all the optics and mounts that have failed me or caused some kind of problem over recent years. Some may not believe my accounts, but it seems like if there is a problem that can happen, it will happen to me, no matter the cost of the optic or mount.

I hope this helps somebody who is considering any of these products.

1.Burris AR 332- set up on an el cheapo 300 blackout ar pistol that was made to be a truck gun. Shot 9 inch groups at 20 yds. Never cared to find out if it was the gun or the optic. Sold them back to the store.

2. Aimpoint T2 KAC night vision height mount- set up on an FN 15 rifle. POI would shift back and forth between high right and low left if it got bumped. Turned out to be the KAC mount had faulty screws. It has been permanently shelved.

*The LWRC M6A2 6.8spc* this rifle gets its own section because it was like a magnet for defective products.

4. It started with a vortex viper pst lpvo in a WARNE XSKEL mount. Would not hold zero. Disassembled the mount. The screw inserts were not thread locked in
properly after being examined by a warne tech; they said it was defective.

5. On to warne mount #2, same optic. It slowly rattled itself apart on a lead sled and once again the optic would not hold zero. Same tech said this mount was fine,
their mounts were just not rated for lead sleds. Weak sauce.

6. Ditched the lpvo that required a separate mount. got an ACOG. The torqued down thumb screws (done by a qualified armorer, whose work i double checked) rattled loose on a 556 rifle after 20 rounds and lost zero. Promptly returned it to the dealer.

7. Finally settled on a different ACOG with a bobro throw lever mount for the original intention of using with a clip on thermal. This ACOG worked fine. Chose a BURRIS BTC 50 thermal. Worked great functionally, EXCEPT for the fact that the thermals mount was non-adjustable, and could not be properly calibrated to line up columnized with the day optic, to which BURRIS technicians said there was nothing they could do about. I now no longer buy, support, or recommend Burris products to anyone. Period. YMMV

Back to everything else.

8. Had a SIG ROMEO 8 red dot on a STAG 3 gun elite match rifle. Rifle had shot awesome groups with other red dots, but the Romeo 8 never seemed to hold repeatable groups like anything else even though the 8 is supposed to be SIG's high end made in america red dot that got a military contract. Sold the red dot back to the dealer used.

Aaaaaand finally,

The SCAR 17. Ive started a couple threads about this rifle as it is my most recent gun id planned to use optics instead of irons on and it is definitely a BIG bag of problems.

9. Started out with a vortex diamondback tactical and an A.R.M.S #72 30mm mount. The scope worked fine but would not fit in the mount, and this is the only mount ive ever had problems with getting a scope base to clear the bottom. Demerit to A.R.M.S.

10. Traded the vortex for an SWFA SS 12x which did fit the A.R.M.S mount (which i really wanted to use). After all that trouble, i finally got the rifle out to shoot and zeroed it, only to find that by the time I had moved back to further distances, when I went to adjust the elevation turret, the set screws that hold the caps on had come loose, so i messed up my zero by turning the turrets back and forth without hearing clicks every time until I realized what was going on.

This was INCREDIBLY frustrating. I then debated if I should keep going with this set up. I took the A.R.M.S qd #72 mount off with the scope still attached, and noticed that not only had the scope caps come loose, but the mount's throw lever locking screw had loosened almost to the point of falling off.

I then decided that it was no longer worth the time, effort, or money to continue pursuing this setup on my SCAR, and that even though it was likely the rifles fault for rattling everything loose, I am still disapointed in both SWFA and ARMS for having products that were supposed to be rated for the SCAR AS STATED by their technicians I spoke with, but clearly arent so capable.

**side note: after all this tomfoolery, i then discovered that my SCAR has a canted barrel, which fills me with inexpressible rage, as I now have a $3000 rifle that I can only use with irons, which has no practical value to me any more than being a novelty at this point.

SO, there you have it. I hope this helps someone else avoid having some of the same problems I did. I have many rifles with optics that have worked out great for me, but these are all the ones over the last year or so that have been giant turds. Do what you will with this information.
 
Well arms mount/rings are definitely a very very big red flags ... I mean ARMS anything hasn’t been known for anything quality post 2008 and another red flag is damaging a SWFA fixed power. Do you torque it in foot/lbs with a 1/2in drive torque wrench ?


Viper PST - sure they’re garbage, so is the Diamond back tactical So is the Burris AR332.

But yeah busting an Acog and a SWFA fixed power ... that’s something else.

Also huh .... if every single gun you ever owned can’t group at 50 ... maybe you should have a buddy who can shoot set you up or at least verify that your gear is properly mounted... or verify the accuracy.

Also who the fucks get a Scar17 and set it up with a chinesium Diamond back on Arms rings ... come on dude if you can afford this shit then you should pony up for a Razor 1-10 or Atacr 1-8 ... or in your case you’re probably the perfect candidate for the vcog 1-8. It’s crayon eater proof, integral mount, etc.
 
what do you want vortex has the world best warranty no one ever said they were going to work as intended ... gee some people are never happy . and are you sure those scopes failed you or did you fail them .😊
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SmolPP
Well arms mount/rings are definitely a very very big red flags ... I mean ARMS anything hasn’t been known for anything quality post 2008 and another red flag is damaging a SWFA fixed power. Do you torque it in foot/lbs with a 1/2in drive torque wrench ?


Viper PST - sure they’re garbage, so is the Diamond back tactical So is the Burris AR332.

But yeah busting an Acog and a SWFA fixed power ... that’s something else.

Also huh .... if every single gun you ever owned can’t group at 50 ... maybe you should have a buddy who can shoot set you up or at least verify that your gear is properly mounted... or verify the accuracy.

Also who the fucks get a Scar17 and set it up with a chinesium Diamond back on Arms rings ... come on dude if you can afford this shit then you should pony up for a Razor 1-10 or Atacr 1-8 ... or in your case you’re probably the perfect candidate for the vcog 1-8. It’s crayon eater proof, integral mount, etc.
I didnt bust any ACOG or SWFA. They both had problems with screws coming loose. nothing about them is broken.

There is an acog sitting on a bushmaster acr that prints 6in groups at 400 yds. But this is not the rifle in question. I buy and trade dozens of rifles/scopes every year. Most work out fine. Alot of them dont. The above mentioned ACR makes it all the more frustrating that a SCAR, the rifle that beat the acr is producing so many problems as of late.

I got mad. I vented. I feel better now.
 
Well arms mount/rings are definitely a very very big red flags ... I mean ARMS anything hasn’t been known for anything quality post 2008 and another red flag is damaging a SWFA fixed power. Do you torque it in foot/lbs with a 1/2in drive torque wrench ?


Viper PST - sure they’re garbage, so is the Diamond back tactical So is the Burris AR332.

But yeah busting an Acog and a SWFA fixed power ... that’s something else.

Also huh .... if every single gun you ever owned can’t group at 50 ... maybe you should have a buddy who can shoot set you up or at least verify that your gear is properly mounted... or verify the accuracy.

Also who the fucks get a Scar17 and set it up with a chinesium Diamond back on Arms rings ... come on dude if you can afford this shit then you should pony up for a Razor 1-10 or Atacr 1-8 ... or in your case you’re probably the perfect candidate for the vcog 1-8. It’s crayon eater proof, integral mount, etc.
The vcog has the same thumscrew mount that basic acogs do. These mounts are known to be garbage.

Lastly, what difference does it make how much an optic costs when the FUCKING $3000 RIFLE CAME WITH A CROOKED BARREL! sorry im not mad at you, it just burns me inside.
what do you want vortex has the world best warranty no one ever said they were going to work as intended ... gee some people are never happy .😊
None of the vortexs mentioned were actually the source of any problems. Everything vortex makes that ive used has worked reasonably well actually.
 
The vcog has the same thumscrew mount that basic acogs do. These mounts are known to be garbage.

Lastly, what difference does it make how much an optic costs when the FUCKING $3000 RIFLE CAME WITH A CROOKED BARREL! sorry im not mad at you, it just burns me inside.

None of the vortexs mentioned were actually the source of any problems. Everything vortex makes that ive used has worked reasonably well actually.
Bobro and Larue has mounts for Acog and VCOG. More reliable than the thumbscrew.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SmolPP
I don’t know if any gentle way to say this but I think it should be said. In every one of your examples, I almost certainly see user error as the source, or utter lack of any user care to resolve the most basic of issues. These are extremely basic issues that it seems you have zero interest in correcting - and almost all these issues appear tied to what you did, not the parts.

Your .300blk, were you shooting subsonic ammo out of it? Because immediately what comes to my mind is that you were shooting the wrong ammo for the twist rate of your barrel.

I’ve had good optics fall off guns before, I don’t blame the mount. I found out what caused it; it was pressing the release lever and hooking the latch on my gear.

Cheap optics are cheap. You’re spending a TON of money on guns and buying absolute garbage pile optics and mounts.

Your ARMS mount wasn’t a problem. You literally bought the wrong mount and the center hub of the scope was touching the mount, the rings weren’t even touching the scope tube. It’s not a part issue, it’s a user issue.

You shelved a bad Knights mount and aimpoint instead of warrantying it?

Your SCAR barrel is canted? How? Obviously the gas system runs. It doesn’t matter if it’s canted in determining the use of irons or optics; you adjust for the cant, every barrel has some degree of cant.

These are mechanical systems. They will need intelligent assembly, maintenance, use and problem solving. There’s no magic and there’s no money that buys perfection.
 
Last edited:
This guy should give up shooting and switch to being an “occupy democrats” web handler. He’s great at posting BS.
 
Almost all of that seems to be not optics that fail you but screws, thread locker and product selection that fail you.

I've had a large number of optics actually fail and the reason for that has been, with only 3 exceptions, they were trash optics to begin with. It took a long time to work my way up the ladder far enough to be able to afford anything like decent glass. The 3 exceptions have been with Nightforce SHV, S&B PM II with birthday cake turrets and IOR Valdada Recon. The NF just plain shit the bed, turrets stopped moving entirely. The PM II elevation turret finally just wore out from, essentially, over-use. The IOR elevation turret locked up entirely for unknown reasons. All were repaired or replaced by the manufacturer. Vortex Razor 2 (2 of them) elevation turret locked up in matches.

Some other issues I've had emerged from design flaws in other scopes causing me real world problems but the scopes didn't actually fail so much as the adjustment was no longer certain. IOR Recon (a different one than the one that locked up the turret) elevation knob pinch screws came loose on a hunt, knob spun. So, I just used the reticle after verifying zero on a distant rock. USO B-17 tool-less elevation turret was a terrible design for PRS use and came loose on the first stage causing me to lose my zero.

Other problems like perimeter pinch screws on turret caps coming loose can be said to be user error on my part. Every time a high quality scope has failed on me the manufacturer has made it right. Every time a design flaw screwed me up I managed to fumble through the rest of the day with just holdovers. Every time a low end scope has failed me it's been subsequently shot through the objective bell.
 
Things can and will fail. I look for folks that take pride in what they make, to the extent they welcome you sending something back whose performance doesn't make you happy.

There are exceptions, but I find myself spending needless money when I don't stick to my own rule which is wait until they've made a piece of gear for a while, gotten the "teething" problems resolved. I'll wait on gen 1, II, and bite on gen III.-not always-but that's what I tend to do. Saved me money.

Some outfits out there are insane/crazy about QC, and will go overboard to fix things that wasn't the fault of the gear, but your "fuck up".

I've got lighting ProFoto strobes I bought over 20 yrs. ago (1200 and 2400 WS), Before they sell these, each power pack was given an 'R' test, That's where the strobe was fired at FULL POWER 360, repeat 360 consecutive times at FULL POWER, and THEN disassembled, and gone over w/a fine tooth comb, then reassembled and then sold.

These things work perfect, and I use them as much as my newer strobes. 20 yrs is an incredible lifespan for a professional/ "working strobe". An "R" test given to many of the strobes sold even today would destroy/fry them.

My Beretta 92 passed from my Dad to me, and will be going to my son, racks like it's on ball bearings, and is just simply a pleasure to shoot. The gun is damn near 35 years old or something like that, I forgot when my Dad bought it.

I'm a lefty, I had an Eotech I used on one of my shotguns for years where I finally got around to trying to swap the mount over so I could swing it over to the left side when I didn't need to use it. Someone had put too much loctite/the wrong loctite on the screws.

No matter how much I heated the mount/got the mount so hot I was afraid I'd warp the casing, the screws wouldn't budge, so I contacted Eotech told them up front how old this thing was, and could they help me, and despite being years off the warranty, they said "yeah send it in, we'll fix it".

A lot of these folks, if you talk to them w/respect, will go a mile to help, and these are the folks I try to find out about. They're insane crazy about perfecting their products (of course nobody ever really achieves perfection), back up their product when things go wrong, and then I try to wait until gen III comes out.

You buy something, you're buying into the pride/resolve/innovation/follow through of the company that makes it. There are no shortcuts, you're going to pay money for that, and unfortunately you don't have as many choices when you don't have the money.

BTW: This works both ways; I talked w/some outfits I've developed a relationship with, and they're told me about some of the BS cons some folks have tried to pull on them after fucking up gear/abusing it, then trying to get them to foot the bill for a repair. An accident is different.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gbaby125
Things can and will fail. I look for folks that take pride in what they make, to the extent they welcome you sending something back whose performance doesn't make you happy.

There are exceptions, but I find myself spending needless money when I don't stick to my own rule which is wait until they've made a piece of gear for a while, gotten the "teething" problems resolved. I'll wait on gen 1, II, and bite on gen III.-not always-but that's what I tend to do. Saved me money.

Some outfits out there are insane/crazy about QC, and will go overboard to fix things that wasn't the fault of the gear, but your "fuck up".

I've got lighting ProFoto strobes I bought over 20 yrs. ago (1200 and 2400 WS), Before they sell these, each power pack was given an 'R' test, That's where the strobe was fired at FULL POWER 360, repeat 360 consecutive times at FULL POWER, and THEN disassembled, and gone over w/a fine tooth comb, then reassembled and then sold.

These things work perfect, and I use them as much as my newer strobes. 20 yrs is an incredible lifespan for a professional/ "working strobe". An "R" test given to many of the strobes sold even today would destroy/fry them.

My Beretta 92 passed from my Dad to me, and will be going to my son, racks like it's on ball bearings, and is just simply a pleasure to shoot. The gun is damn near 35 years old or something like that, I forgot when my Dad bought it.

I'm a lefty, I had an Eotech I used on one of my shotguns for years where I finally got around to trying to swap the mount over so I could swing it over to the left side when I didn't need to use it. Someone had put too much loctite/the wrong loctite on the screws.

No matter how much I heated the mount/got the mount so hot I was afraid I'd warp the casing, the screws wouldn't budge, so I contacted Eotech told them up front how old this thing was, and could they help me, and despite being years off the warranty, they said "yeah send it in, we'll fix it".

A lot of these folks, if you talk to them w/respect, will go a mile to help, and these are the folks I try to find out about. They're insane crazy about perfecting their products (of course nobody ever really achieves perfection), back up their product when things go wrong, and then I try to wait until gen III comes out.

You buy something, you're buying into the pride/resolve/innovation/follow through of the company that makes it. There are no shortcuts, you're going to pay money for that, and unfortunately you don't have as many choices when you don't have the money.

BTW: This works both ways; I talked w/some outfits I've developed a relationship with, and they're told me about some of the BS cons some folks have tried to pull on them after fucking up gear/abusing it, then trying to get them to foot the bill for a repair. An accident is different.
Couldn't have said it better myself.

I was all jacked up about buying a newly released optic from a company I will not name, but then it dawned on me that this may or may not be a good idea to be a guineapig so I canceled my order and went with another very well vested optic, and I ended up being glad I did after some early reviews have come out that weren't 100% positive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Convex
I don’t know if any gentle way to say this but I think it should be said. In every one of your examples, I almost certainly see user error as the source, or utter lack of any user care to resolve the most basic of issues. These are extremely basic issues that it seems you have zero interest in correcting - and almost all these issues appear tied to what you did, not the parts.

Your .300blk, were you shooting subsonic ammo out of it? Because immediately what comes to my mind is that you were shooting the wrong ammo for the twist rate of your barrel.

I’ve had good optics fall off guns before, I don’t blame the mount. I found out what caused it; it was pressing the release lever and hooking the latch on my gear.

Cheap optics are cheap. You’re spending a TON of money on guns and buying absolute garbage pile optics and mounts.

Your ARMS mount wasn’t a problem. You literally bought the wrong mount and the center hub of the scope was touching the mount, the rings weren’t even touching the scope tube. It’s not a part issue, it’s a user issue.

You shelved a bad Knights mount and aimpoint instead of warrantying it?

Your SCAR barrel is canted? How? Obviously the gas system runs. It doesn’t matter if it’s canted in determining the use of irons or optics; you adjust for the cant, every barrel has some degree of cant.

These are mechanical systems. They will need intelligent assembly, maintenance, use and problem solving. There’s no magic and there’s no money that buys perfection.
Bro just sayin the other day you did try to explain to me how a SCAR is supposed to work with optics etc. for a fairly long string of messages only to conclude with telling me that you've never owned one...

Btw canted barrel or not, thats not a problem that should be happening with a $3000 rifle. That is something that should be relegated to the universe of cheap AKs.

Things can and will fail. I look for folks that take pride in what they make, to the extent they welcome you sending something back whose performance doesn't make you happy.

There are exceptions, but I find myself spending needless money when I don't stick to my own rule which is wait until they've made a piece of gear for a while, gotten the "teething" problems resolved. I'll wait on gen 1, II, and bite on gen III.-not always-but that's what I tend to do. Saved me money.

Some outfits out there are insane/crazy about QC, and will go overboard to fix things that wasn't the fault of the gear, but your "fuck up".

I've got lighting ProFoto strobes I bought over 20 yrs. ago (1200 and 2400 WS), Before they sell these, each power pack was given an 'R' test, That's where the strobe was fired at FULL POWER 360, repeat 360 consecutive times at FULL POWER, and THEN disassembled, and gone over w/a fine tooth comb, then reassembled and then sold.

These things work perfect, and I use them as much as my newer strobes. 20 yrs is an incredible lifespan for a professional/ "working strobe". An "R" test given to many of the strobes sold even today would destroy/fry them.

My Beretta 92 passed from my Dad to me, and will be going to my son, racks like it's on ball bearings, and is just simply a pleasure to shoot. The gun is damn near 35 years old or something like that, I forgot when my Dad bought it.

I'm a lefty, I had an Eotech I used on one of my shotguns for years where I finally got around to trying to swap the mount over so I could swing it over to the left side when I didn't need to use it. Someone had put too much loctite/the wrong loctite on the screws.

No matter how much I heated the mount/got the mount so hot I was afraid I'd warp the casing, the screws wouldn't budge, so I contacted Eotech told them up front how old this thing was, and could they help me, and despite being years off the warranty, they said "yeah send it in, we'll fix it".

A lot of these folks, if you talk to them w/respect, will go a mile to help, and these are the folks I try to find out about. They're insane crazy about perfecting their products (of course nobody ever really achieves perfection), back up their product when things go wrong, and then I try to wait until gen III comes out.

You buy something, you're buying into the pride/resolve/innovation/follow through of the company that makes it. There are no shortcuts, you're going to pay money for that, and unfortunately you don't have as many choices when you don't have the money.

BTW: This works both ways; I talked w/some outfits I've developed a relationship with, and they're told me about some of the BS cons some folks have tried to pull on them after fucking up gear/abusing it, then trying to get them to foot the bill for a repair. An accident is different.
True shit. Though not sure why everyone's saying it has to do with a bunch of cheap shit, I feel like the list I made was half cheap shit half overpriced shit, but paradoxically it also seems like the two price extremes are where products become faulty. Super cheap junk and exorbitantly overpriced items always seem to have problems whereas stuff in a happy medium of price and quality works fine. At least that's my experience.
 
As a younger man coming up, it took me a long time to realize that cheap shit is most expensive shit you can buy. It keeps you on the phone and on hold. You gotta ship it back, and wait for it to come back to you, until the next time you've gotta fix it AND then ship it back again..

You don't have the use of it while it's in the shop so you've got to wait or buy a replacement.

I'm an old man now, and I cant stand wasting time, on shit that keeps breaking, listening to fucked up music while I'm hold, wasting time boxing a POS up and driving down to wait in line at UPS/USPS.

Whoever selects the music they play while you're on hold should be tied up and made to listen to it all day.

I understand that things break, but some stuff just keeps on breaking. I won't buy it.

I shoot pictures w/my camera gear, and I shoot my guns to relax, not to stress out over shit breaking. I'll pay more money to have peace.
 
Last edited:
As a younger man coming up, it took me a long time to realize that cheap shit is most expensive shit you can buy. It keeps you on the phone and on hold. You gotta ship it back, and wait for it to come back to you, until the next time you've gotta fix it AND then ship it back again..

You don't have the use of it while it's in the shop so you've got to wait or buy a replacement.

I'm an old man now, and I cant stand wasting time, on shit that keeps breaking, listening to fucked up music while I'm hold, wasting time boxing a POS up and driving down to wait in line at UPS/USPS.

I understand that things break, but some stuff just keeps on breaking. I won't buy it.

I shoot pictures w/my camera gear, and I shoot my guns to relax, not to stress out over shit breaking. I'll pay more money to have peace.
Amen once again!

I'm getting older, and won't put up with BS anymore.

I started reloading as another hobby and to gain more accuracy. Also to save a few bucks so I could shoot more often.

I really ended up enjoying it to where it is relaxing and therapeutic for me, but I would try to go cheap every now and then to of course, save $. This never worked out very well for me because it made many reloading sessions a miserable experience. This can even happen when you think you need a piece equipment just because its more expensive and may make your session go easier. It's doesn't always go as planned.
 
Right back at you, you're right.

You pay up front for a good piece of gear. A POS makes you keep on paying, while givng you a headache.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCX
The vcog has the same thumscrew mount that basic acogs do. These mounts are known to be garbage.

Lastly, what difference does it make how much an optic costs when the FUCKING $3000 RIFLE CAME WITH A CROOKED BARREL! sorry im not mad at you, it just burns me inside.

None of the vortexs mentioned were actually the source of any problems. Everything vortex makes that ive used has worked reasonably well actually.
I’ll buy your scar for $1000
 
OK GUYS. I finally put an elcan on my scar. Are you happy now? I cant be happy until you are happy. Do i have your undivided approval? Please Validate me, please...
 
I'm an old man now, and I cant stand wasting time, on shit that keeps breaking, listening to fucked up music while I'm hold, wasting time boxing a POS up and driving down to wait in line at UPS/USPS.

Whoever selects the music they play while you're on hold should be tied up and made to listen to it all day.
Your saying you dont like 15 second instrumental synth pop loops and van halen III with gary cherone?
 
give it a few years till the optics that matter most give out on you , old age can do crappy things to ones eyes if they are not lucky ..
 
  • Like
Reactions: carbonbased
I’m still waiting for the SB, TT, ZCO vs NF torture test 🤣
 
  • Love
Reactions: deersniper