• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Maggie’s Examples of How Women (and Effeminate Men) Can Screw Things Up

Longshot231

Four Star General
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Mar 8, 2018
    10,959
    37,851
    I'm not a woman hater. I just believe that women and men are designed to perform certain roles in the home, society and government. The feminists and leftists are ruining this country by trying to rearrange a God-ordained design for everything. Putting women in charge of something entails risks.

    The more critical the assignment and the higher the skill sets required increase those risks.

    In the interest of full disclosure I will repeat my assertion that one of the biggest mistakes this country ever made was giving women the right to vote.

    My postings on this esteemed forum have not hidden that fact. So call me biased if you want. I don't care.

    As the title of this thread is self-explanatory I will be the first to start. In addition, I don't want anyone thinking that will leave anyone out but have included the sissified male segments in this subject as well. After all, they think too much with their feminine side of their brain.

    Many of you have probably already read about the manhunt that is on for escaped felon, Casey White. As most of you are aware, he escaped with Alabama Corrections Officer Vicki White (no relation).

    Putting female corrections officers over male inmates makes as much sense as putting a screen door on a submarine.

    Look at their wanted posters. He's 6'9" and 260 to 330 pounds. She is 5'5" and 145 pounds. Heck, I'm bigger than she is and I would not want to transport a prisoner that big unless I had another deputy or two with me. Yet she did it alone.

    Are we to really believe that nobody saw this coming?

    Also note that Ms. White was the Assistant Director for Corrections at that facility. IMHO, her cheese slid off the cracker a long time ago and someone should have seen this coming.

    From the article below; "Lauderdale Sheriff Rick Singleton revealed Tuesday that tips from inmates led authorities to uncover a "special relationship" between the jail’s assistant director of corrections and the dangerous prisoner."

    No shit! Now just when did his office get those "tips?" Was it before or after they escaped?




    So that was my contribution to starting this thread off. I'm anxious to see what other contributions others may have.
     
    I could say that the Titanic should not have sailed or perhaps should have charted a different course or slowed at night, or carried more boats.

    While I would be correct in every measure none of those changes will be made because we cannot change the past.

    Women voting? Those who passed that ammendment knew what they were doing. They were creating an electorate that could be easily controlled by feelings and appearances.

    You may be correct in every measure but you're fighting the last war. Today's war is CRT, and the recruitment of children into perversion.
     
    I could say that the Titanic should not have sailed or perhaps should have charted a different course or slowed at night, or carried more boats.

    While I would be correct in every measure none of those changes will be made because we cannot change the past.

    Women voting? Those who passed that ammendment knew what they were doing. They were creating an electorate that could be easily controlled by feelings and appearances.

    You may be correct in every measure but you're fighting the last war. Today's war is CRT, and the recruitment of children into perversion.

    I'm not fighting the last war but saying that ever since women were permitted the right to vote, things have gone badly for us.

    You are correct that CRT and the sexual abuse of children are the new battlegrounds. However, look at some of the main actors of CRT and human trafficking.

    iu
    iu
    1229458.jpg
    iu
    iu






    guardaespaldas-hilary-880x571.jpg
     
    Thank goodness the US is still controlled by greedy, perverted old white men the way God intended.
    Last time I checked , the Muslim Brotherhood had a very strong influence in the Obama regime, and that's who's still running things in the fed govt to a large extent. Valerie Jarret is Obama's Right Hand and ran the whole shadow govt of subversion while Trump was in office. The richest woman in the world is Oprah and the VP is Kamala Harris. They sure aren't white. There's plenty of perverts in DC and Hollyweird for sure, but this idea that all these white men have all the control is hogwash. Hells bells we are about to seat a woman on the Supream Court just because she's a woman and not white so, these all controlling white men are doing a crappy job of controlling. It's the white women and "minorities " (whatever that means anyway) that keep dooming us on election day to go further down this path to destruction, if elections even matter anymore.

    The truth is that its not "white vs black or other" its not "men vs women" "its definitely not "Pub vs Dem" it's the Coporate Elites vs the rest of us, and it always has been. IF (big if) we ever all got that and really understood what it meant, all of this other racial , sexist, Bull Shit wouldn't even be a thought and we could actually do something about it.
     
    Illogical people make illogical decisions that almost always go sideways. Every city, state and country currently governed by a woman is circling a drain on some level. I am hoping this newer generation of conservative women will be different but they have a long way to go to offset the current liberal female ding-bats.
     
    I think that women being allowed to vote may not necessarily be a good thing but it is just. Voting is about having ones interests represented and if they can't vote, then there's no chance they're going to be treated fairly.

    It has sure played out that women vote emotionally but it is what it is.

    If you think women's right to vote are the cause of some decline, or that things were better when only men could vote then I suggest taking a look at all the Shitholistans.

    The problem is clear. It is not an issue about women. It is about identity politics and people hiring based not on merit but to fill a quota.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: lariat and NoDopes
    Would you rather a woman vote that owns a business, owns a home, and manages her finances and life?.....or a 40 year old man still living with his mom, drawing disabilty, weighing 300lbs, and smokes weed ten times a week?

    I believe a lot of world issues revolve around lack of morality. We cant engage in civil conversation, trade, or disagreement. The driving behaviors of people, the way people treat others, cheating spouses, and even the content within a forumn like this tells me where all issues stem.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: lariat
    Women voting? Those who passed that ammendment knew what they were doing. They were creating an electorate that could be easily controlled by feelings and appearances.
    What happened right after that !

    Oh that’s right. The first sweeping gun bans aka NFA 1934
    And the. The start of socialism/communism in a big way in the US



    More suffering from suffrage
     
    Men run on logic and women run on emotions. Most women will favor those they feel will take better care of them. Their voting tendencies prove that without a doubt.
    I disagree.

    If women favored those they felt would better take care of them we wouldn't have so many single mother households and deadbeats with seven kids with seven different baby mommas.

    Let's not kid ourselves... none of us have any idea why women think or act the way they do. You can waste a lifetime trying to figure them out and the only logical conclusion you'd draw is that they're all batshit crazy to varying degrees. You find one with minimal crazy that's easy on the eyes and accept the fact that the mind of a women is and will forever be one of life's greatest mysteries.

    They're sure as shit emotional though. Nobody's going to argue that.
     
    Voting is about having ones interests represented and if they
    No

    You really think welfare leeches homeless etc should be able to vote.


    At the VERY least you should have to be a new positive tax payer.

    Really should go back to the constitutional requirements.


    We’d have none of the problems we have now.
     
    What happened right after that !

    Oh that’s right. The first sweeping gun bans aka NFA 1934
    And the. The start of socialism/communism in a big way in the US



    More suffering from suffrage
    And how many women were lawmakers there at the time to vote for that? How many of those antique soccer moms voted for politicians specifically to support that?

    ETA: if you are worried about women voting emotionally you should then be MORE concerned about who is intentionally manipulating those emotions. Those are the ones who are against what you want this country to be.
     
    Last edited:
    No

    You really think welfare leeches homeless etc should be able to vote.


    At the VERY least you should have to be a new positive tax payer.

    Really should go back to the constitutional requirements.


    We’d have none of the problems we have now.
    That's much worse for a democracy than to have parasites having equal voting rights.

    If only taxpayers can vote, there will be a group that will vote to lower the income of a large group below the taxable threshold, and move the taxable threshold to strip said group of any potential to vote.

    Without the ability to vote, they cannot effect any change to allow them to vote.

    Alienating the rights to vote doesn't equal slavery but it is inevitable.
     
    That's much worse for a democracy than to have parasites having equal voting rights.

    If only taxpayers can vote, there will be a group that will vote to lower the income of a large group below the taxable threshold, and move the taxable threshold to strip said group of any potential to vote.

    Without the ability to vote, they cannot effect any change to allow them to vote.

    Alienating the rights to vote doesn't equal slavery but it is inevitable.
    Make it voluntary, where an individual can choose between receiving government assistance or participating in our elections.

    If the well off vote to decrease government assistance and push down the lower class, the poors go back to ballot box and force change.

    When citizens realize they can vote themself benefits, the whole system is doomed. We've known this for a looooong time.
     
    Men run on logic and women run on emotions. Most women will favor those they feel will take better care of them. Their voting tendencies prove that without a doubt.
    Women run on looks and charisma too as in the case of Bill Clinton vs. old man Bush in '92 and the fantasy of BBC in the case of Obama in '2009. Jokes on them when it turned out his 'wife' Big Mike was the one packing the big meat.
     
    Last edited:
    That's much worse for a democracy than to have parasites having equal voting rights.

    If only taxpayers can vote, there will be a group that will vote to lower the income of a large group below the taxable threshold, and move the taxable threshold to strip said group of any potential to vote.

    Without the ability to vote, they cannot effect any change to allow them to vote.

    Alienating the rights to vote doesn't equal slavery but it is inevitable.
    Everybody that votes should have skin in the game.....

    Voting should be mandatory.
    If you are over 18 - you are of age to enjoy the freedoms and benefits this country has to offer - you should also be held responsible for helping make the decisions.

    People at even the lowest tax brackets should be taxed so they will have a reason to vote for representatives that are better stewards of the public till. There is no "free". Somebody has to pay for everything. If everybody has to help pay - maybe it changes their thoughts a little bit?

    People that are not LEGAL citizens should be forbidden from voting.
    Where is the incentive to become legal if you get to enjoy the same freedoms and rights afforded to citizens - without any of the responsibilities?

    You should have to show the same ID, and fill out the exact same 4473 form to vote as to buy a gun. If we are going to infringe on one right... why not all?
     
    Yup. Should get rid of everything except for sales tax

    Maybe then people would give the yellow truck etc .gov parasites hell
    They would be better off getting rid of the income tax and just use a sales tax system, that way, all those folks that are scamming the system or are here illegally still contribute.
     
    Last time I checked , the Muslim Brotherhood had a very strong influence in the Obama regime, and that's who's still running things in the fed govt to a large extent. Valerie Jarret is Obama's Right Hand and ran the whole shadow govt of subversion while Trump was in office. The richest woman in the world is Oprah and the VP is Kamala Harris. They sure aren't white. There's plenty of perverts in DC and Hollyweird for sure, but this idea that all these white men have all the control is hogwash. Hells bells we are about to seat a woman on the Supream Court just because she's a woman and not white so, these all controlling white men are doing a crappy job of controlling. It's the white women and "minorities " (whatever that means anyway) that keep dooming us on election day to go further down this path to destruction, if elections even matter anymore.

    The truth is that its not "white vs black or other" its not "men vs women" "its definitely not "Pub vs Dem" it's the Coporate Elites vs the rest of us, and it always has been. IF (big if) we ever all got that and really understood what it meant, all of this other racial , sexist, Bull Shit wouldn't even be a thought and we could actually do something about it.
    Ok Karl. It’s all about class eh? Bullshit. It’s about good and evil and always has been. Trying to simplify it so you don’t have to think doesn’t work.
     
    Who was the first to suggest complete equality?

    Satan. When he approached the woman.

    Eat of this fruit and you will be like God, knowing the difference between good and evil.

    And the woman desired to be like God; thus she stepped out of her God designed, beautiful role and tried to usurp power. And humanity was cast into sin.

    Not to get the man off the hook, where was Adam? He was off somewhere not doing his job in apathy. How the hell did the serpent manage to live in the garden? A good man would have taken a shovel to it.

    Women in their fallen nature want to exercise power that is not theirs to wield.

    Men want to avoid the responsibility to properly and timely wield the power that is given to them by God in order that they might protect women and advance the kingdom of righteousness.

    Those two failings feed into each other, especially when you give women the right to vote for a govt to protect and provide for them instead of man like God intended.

    This gives them the illicit satisfaction of exercising power and rule that God designed for man while simultaneously voting for the govt to take care of them instead of the man like God intended. It gives them all the power and (they think) all the protection. It eliminates man from the picture and completely bastardizes God's design in a truly demonic way.
     
    Who was the first to suggest complete equality?

    Satan. When he approached the woman.

    Eat of this fruit and you will be like God, knowing the difference between good and evil.

    And the woman desired to be like God; thus she stepped out of her God designed, beautiful role and tried to usurp power. And humanity was cast into sin.

    Not to get the man off the hook, where was Adam? He was off somewhere not doing his job in apathy. How the hell did the serpent manage to live in the garden? A good man would have taken a shovel to it.

    Women in their fallen nature want to exercise power that is not theirs to wield.

    Men want to avoid the responsibility to properly and timely wield the power that is given to them by God in order that they might protect women and advance the kingdom of righteousness.

    Those two failings feed into each other, especially when you give women the right to vote for a govt to protect and provide for them instead of man like God intended.

    This gives them the illicit satisfaction of exercising power and rule that God designed for man while simultaneously voting for the govt to take care of them instead of the man like God intended. It gives them all the power and (they think) all the protection. It eliminates man from the picture and completely bastardizes God's design in a truly demonic way.
    This hits the core of the issue: the failing of leadership. If there is a vacuum it will get filled, and not by individuals with honorable intent.

    Men need to fulfill their responsibilities to lead the home, instruct their children and be able to articulate why they lead in a certain direction so that everyone is informed and thereby create a wall of reasoning that protects the morality of the family and as a result the country. Getting rid of the family unit destroys a country. This is the goal - an information vacuum that is filled with little reason and much blind emotion. Then you have usefully ignorant subjects that can be directed as needed. It’s happening now to both men and women.
     
    Last edited:
    This hits the core of the issue: the failing of leadership. If there is a vacuum it will get filled, and not by individuals with honorable intent.

    Men need to fulfill their responsibilities to lead the home, instruct their children and be able to articulate why they lead in a certain direction so that everyone is informed and thereby create a wall of reasoning that protects the morality of the family and as a result the country. Getting rid of the family unit destroys a country. This is the goal - an information vacuum that is filled with little reason and much blind emotion. Then you have usefully ignorant subjects that can be directed as needed. It’s happening now to both men and women.

    Men do need to fulfill their responsibilities. However, when most men try to do that, the women in the family, almost every time, try to usurp the Father's authority.

    If a women forgets her wedding vows, as most of them do, they head off to divorce court where things go from bad to worse for the man. As long as the women know that there will be leftist judges in their hip pockets they will rule over men with the sword of the state.

    That's one of the major factors why men are not getting married anymore. The guys in their 20's have witnessed the destruction of the older American males and want nothing to do with marriage because there is NOTHING in it for the man except more financial and emotional pain and misery.

    If you're a man in your twenties looking for a wife, realize that she may put on a good façade before she says "I do," but after that the mask comes off. The message to young American males, after marriage, is "Obey or else."

    I've used a lot of ink to basically say that your premise is good except for one problem. The laws and the courts prevent men from performing their traditional roles of head and protector of the family. That's why you don't see men leading in the home, instructing children and articulating why the family should go in a certain direction.
     
    Last edited:
    Men do need to fulfill their responsibilities. However, when most men try to do that, the women in the family, almost every time, try to usurp the Father's authority.

    If a women forgets her wedding vows, as most of them do, they head off to divorce court where things go from bad to worse for the man. As long as the women know that there will be leftist judges in their hip pockets they will rule over men with the sword of the state.

    That's one of the major factors why men are not getting married anymore. The guys in their 20's have witnessed the destruction of the older American males and want nothing to do with marriage because there is NOTHING in it for the man except more financial and emotional pain and misery.

    If you're a man in your twenties looking for a wife, realize that she may put on a good façade before she says "I do," but after that the mask comes off. The message to young American males, after marriage, is "Obey or else."

    I've used a lot of ink to basically say that your premise is good except for one problem. The laws and the courts prevent men from performing their traditional roles of head and protector of the family. That's why you don't see men leading in the home, instructing children and articulating why the family should go in a certain direction.
    I can definitely see your point and it isn’t hard for me to go through my personal Rolodex of contacts to see where this has played out just as you state.
     
    No way, I can still outrun a 12 year old. Especially if I can get close enough to knock him down...
    Most of the shooters I see - would have to stop and rest at the 20 yard point, and 30 minutes later still wouldn't have their heart rate under control to shoot.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Bender
    More examples of how uneducated and uninformed media zombies ruin everything due to not understanding how anything works. This is not all attributable to stupidity, but stupidity is a part of it.

    can be man woman or any race, stupid/uneducated/uninformed/etc are everywhere...
     
    I disagree.

    If women favored those they felt would better take care of them we wouldn't have so many single mother households and deadbeats with seven kids with seven different baby mommas.
    The welfare queens favor the democrats for taking care of them. The baby daddys are just a means to an end for them.
     
    Last edited: