Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look at the eyes, the eyebrows, the cheekbones, and the teeth.
83 percent of likely voters today are concerned about election integrity ahead of the 2022 midterms, and 75 percent are concerned about election cheating.
Additionally, a May poll found that 55 percent of U.S. voters at that time believed that cheating changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
![]()
REPORT: 83% Of Americans Concerned About Election Integrity In Midterm Elections, 75% Concerned About CHEATING - Majority Also Believe The 2020 Election Was STOLEN | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson
A new report from Rasmussen Reports shows that a vast majority of Americans are concerned about election integrity and election cheating.www.thegatewaypundit.com
I told you Manchin was no savior and was just angling for a better deal for himself.
I told you Manchin was no savior and was just angling for a better deal for himself.
Not one bit. I just understand that empowering and growing gov is the same thing as disempowering the people. More government isn’t the solution to intentionally government made problems created to have a desired effect. Gov intervention is why we are heading down this path to begin with.So after reading the article, looks like you are all for the current shit we have? Nice.
Good time to be Norwegian or at least as far North as you can get...is gonna be cold in fuck the eu
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
It is not the size of the government, but the role they play be it good, bad or corrupt. Big government could be good if all of it's resources are used to better the people of the US and rid it of the leaches we have running it. We need to fix all that is wrong with it by any means possible.Not one bit. I just understand that empowering and growing gov is the same thing as disempowering the people. More government isn’t the solution to intentionally government made problems created to have a desired effect. Gov intervention is why we are heading down this path to begin with.
That's incredibly naïve. Size creates inevitable waste and corruption in ANY human organization. Companies, governments, militaries, ANY organization. Only insects can scale without changing the fundamental nature of their organization. The most powerful tool in preserving liberty and keeping limited, liberal government is controlling it's size, period. There is no such thing as a "just, big government", period.It is not the size of the government, but the role they play be it good, bad or corrupt. Big government could be good if all of it's resources are used to better the people of the US and rid it of the leaches we have running it. We need to fix all that is wrong with it by any means possible.![]()
^ we saw it with Hilary and Angela
No it's not naive, if it is properly managed. Problem is, it has been corrupt probably longer than we can imagine all the way down to local government. We should have the biggest baddest military on the planet! We, the US should tell NATO and the EU how to act, instead we are corrupt and compromised as as nation and have been sold out by the people that work for us.That's incredibly naïve. Size creates inevitable waste and corruption in ANY human organization. Companies, governments, militaries, ANY organization. Only insects can scale without changing the fundamental nature of their organization. The most powerful tool in preserving liberty and keeping limited, liberal government is controlling it's size, period. There is no such thing as a "just, big government", period.
No it's not naive, if it is properly managed. Problem is, it has been corrupt probably longer than we can imagine all the way down to local government. We should have the biggest baddest military on the planet! We, the US should tell NATO and the EU how to act, instead we are corrupt and compromised as as nation and have been sold out by the people that work for us.
Why would they use a stand in that is just as retarded as the original?Look at the eyes, the eyebrows, the cheekbones, and the teeth.
2 completely different guys.
Okay, in an effort to be more sensitive rename the virus to Faggotpox as it is mostly in the gay community.So blacks now self-identify as Monkeys or what ?
''New York City Health Commissioner Ashwin Wasan has asked World Health Organization (WHO) chief Tedros Ghebreyesus to rename "monkeypox" because he believes the name is stigmatizing and can offend members of a number of races, including blacks , as well as the LGBT community. Vasan stated this on his Twitter, and also attached a copy of the letter to the head of WHO.
“We are growing concerned about the potentially devastating and stigmatizing effect that discussion of the monkeypox virus can have on vulnerable communities,” Vasan wrote. He emphasized that many experts are also concerned about this, given the "painful and racist history in which terminology like this is associated with communities of color."
The commissioner recalled that the virus now spreading did not originate in monkeys and was named so only because it was identified during the study of primates.
According to Vasan, misperceptions about the term "monkey pox" may prevent people from seeking medical attention. He recalled that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of hate crimes against Asians and Pacific Islanders has increased significantly, stressing that the language used in healthcare matters.
“We fear the consequences of stigmatization. associated with the term "monkey pox", may be exacerbated by the fact. that in many cases the transmission of the virus occurs between gay men, bisexual men and other men who have sex with men, That is, part of the community that is already facing stigmatization and violence, ”explained Vasan.
In mid-June, the WHO had already announced that it was working on renaming "monkeypox". The representative of the organization noted that diseases should be given names that would not harm any groupsof monkeys.''
Because of the health of the original. There is a huge difference in faking dementia and having dementia.Why would they use a stand in that is just as retarded as the original?