Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

Rfytkn.gif


__9762173dddaa7ee1b6d9929286bc33df_width-600.jpeg
 
you missed this
__cf939662503ae9efcecd810b0eb7ea65_width-600.jpeg


and this

__23489a0ff7bc4d2b760706e08d76d687_width-600.jpeg

No, I didn't. Trust me, I don't miss anything! And while I, personally, like the first one very much, it was not a valid entry as there was a slight exposure of "the stink." Would not want to violate "the rules" with my choices. Honestly, I believe that particular rule might be a bit too restrictive and would have allowed that pic, if I were moderating. But I'm not a moderator, nor do I make the rules, here. And I don't want the real moderators to start cracking down for real.

And that leads to another concern. A lot of people forgetting/ignoring the rule about "watermarked" pics. They are also a violation of the rules. As much as I also love that content, henceforth, I'll have to disallow those as entries as well, for the similar reasons. This is a rule with which I agree, actually. Using watermarked pics exposes the site to legal risk/liability. Now, maybe those site owners don't care if their pics are used this way. In that case, well, maybe if, somehow, the watermark "dissappeared" before the pic is posted. Your pics could become the cream of the "crop," shall we say?
 
Last edited:
It would be a Ferrari (Testarosa) for me. I'd have one "custom" built (as if they don't "custom build" all of them). But where would I be able to drive it? Where are there places where you could bring it to drive it the way it's supposed to be driven?
Great to look at and prettier in person than in pics but they drive verrry big.

Fast enough, sounds good, handle and stop well for that age car but it’s more of a high speed GT than a “Ferrari”.
 
No, I didn't. Trust me, I don't miss anything! And while I, personally, like the first one very much, it was not a valid entry as there was a slight exposure of "the stink." Would not want to violate "the rules" with my choices. Honestly, I believe that particular rule might be a bit too restrictive and would have allowed that pic, if I were moderating. But I'm not a moderator, nor do I make the rules, here. And I don't want the real moderators to start cracking down for real.

And that leads to another concern. A lot of people forgetting/ignoring the rule about "watermarked" pics. They are also a violation of the rules. As much as I also love that content, henceforth, I'll have to disallow those as entries as well, for the similar reasons. This is a rule with which I agree, actually. Using watermarked pics exposes the site to legal risk/liability. Now, maybe those site owners don't care if their pics are used this way. In that case, well, maybe if, somehow, the watermark "dissappeared" before the pic is posted. Your pics could become the cream of the "crop," shall we say?
I missed the tiny watermark in the corner in one pic and I promptly replaced it with a picture of a moose.
 
Imagine not having an outboard motor. "Paddle faster, I hear hippos."
I can tell you, its scary as fuck. No amount of paddling, or rowing in my case, can outrun a hippo. Luckily on each occasion they all decided I was far enough away from their eddy/pod that they turned back before they caught us. They could have had us at any time.
 
I can tell you, its scary as fuck. No amount of paddling, or rowing in my case, can outrun a hippo. Luckily on each occasion they all decided I was far enough away from their eddy/pod that they turned back before they caught us. They could have had us at any time.
same but not hippos

i was a competitive swimmer and life guard for a while when i was younger

when i go swimming with the dolphins and other water activities with the kids im always amazed how cumbersome we are in the water

in my head im always joking...i was pretty fast but this is just ridiculous lol

better chance against a lion than a big shark