Biden Regime Gave Hamas Leadership in Gaza $75 Million in Early October Knowing a Genocidal Attack by Hamas on Israel Was in the Works | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Hamas terrorists have ruled Gaza since 2007.
www.thegatewaypundit.com - Thread starter Mr.BR
- Start date
www.thegatewaypundit.com 
^^^^^ this!
Very well said! There should be no response to this in terms of a negative one! It's blunt and to the point and correct in every way!
When somebody declares war on you - they are acknowledging the fact that you will fight back.
Retired Israeli general who rescued his family under siege from Hamas is being compared on social media to Liam Neeson's character in 'Taken'
An Israeli grandfather and retired IDF general who rescued his granddaughters from Hamas is being compared on social media to Liam Neeson in "Taken."www.yahoo.com
OMG, this story is worse than the stories about ghost of ukraine and the farmer that stole 50,000 russian tanks with his tractor.
It's all fake but the killing of the little people.
Ever heard the union comment "Don't kill the job."?
I have discovered it applies in politics, medicine, and war.
Ben looks fighting age still how much blood is he going to advocate shedding other than his own?
"Know therefore today that he who goes over before you as a consuming fire is the LORD your God. He will destroy them and subdue them before you. So you shall drive them out and make them perish quickly, as the LORD has promised you." - Deuteronomy 9:4
"After the death of Moses the servant of the Lord, the Lord said to Joshua the son of Nun, Moses' assistant, 'Moses my servant is dead. Now therefore arise, go over this Jordan, you and all this people, into the land that I am giving to them, to the people of Israel. Every place that the sole of your foot will tread upon I have given to you, just as I promised to Moses. From the wilderness and this Lebanon as far as the great river, the river Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites to the Great Sea toward the going down of the sun shall be your territory. No man shall be able to stand before you all the days of your life. Just as I was with Moses, so I will be with you. I will not leave you or forsake you. Be strong and courageous, for you shall cause this people to inherit the land that I swore to their fathers to give them. Only be strong and very courageous, being careful to do according to all the law that Moses my servant commanded you. Do not turn from it to the right hand or to the left, that you may have good success[a] wherever you go. This Book of the Law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it. For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success. Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.” - Joshua 1:1-9
"Now Joshua was old and advanced in years, and the Lord said to him, 'You are old and advanced in years, and there remains yet very much land to possess. This is the land that yet remains: all the regions of the Philistines, and all those of the Geshurites (from the Shihor, which is east of Egypt, northward to the boundary of Ekron, it is counted as Canaanite; there are five rulers of the Philistines, those of Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath, and Ekron), and those of the Avvim, in the south, all the land of the Canaanites, and Mearah that belongs to the Sidonians, to Aphek, to the boundary of the Amorites, and the land of the Gebalites, and all Lebanon, toward the sunrise, from Baal-gad below Mount Hermon to Lebo-hamath, all the inhabitants of the hill country from Lebanon to Misrephoth-maim, even all the Sidonians. I myself will drive them out from before the people of Israel. Only allot the land to Israel for an inheritance, as I have commanded you. Now therefore divide this land for an inheritance to the nine tribes and half the tribe of Manasseh.” - Joshua 13:1–7
This is what happened after they failed to drive them out of the land or Canaan.
"Then the Israelites did what was evil in the sight of the Lord and worshiped the Baals; and they abandoned the Lord, the God of their ancestors, who had brought them out of the land of Egypt; they followed other gods, from among the gods of the peoples who were all around them, and bowed down to them; and they provoked the Lord to anger. They abandoned the Lord, and worshiped Baal and the Astartes." - Judges 2:11-13
"The Israelites again did what was evil in the sight of the Lord, worshiping the Baals and the Astartes, the gods of Aram, the gods of Sidon, the gods of Moab, the gods of the Ammonites, and the gods of the Philistines. Thus they abandoned the Lord, and did not worship him." - Judges 10:6
Not only does Israel still have problems with them today but we as well.
New York City:
California:
The Southern Border:
Put a iphone in one hand and a starcucks in the other and you've got a picture of people who actually think it has any practical application in the real world.
And everyone of them would slit your throat if they got the chance.
(Insert sarcasm font)
Looks like it would be a horrible place to have a suicide vest malfunction….
I think if they tried to record it the reader would not be able to pronounce most of the words and would interrupt the prose with “Wait, WTF did I just read? I need to read that again to understand it.”
It is a scholarly work with alot of info.
I am going to see if I can find it online and listen during my commute.
Had the thought this morning…what if the US has “won” all its unjust wars and “lost” all its just wars with reason and that reason not being just.
Last edited:
🔴 (NSFW) Gaza Ground Assault Imminent, Israel Recommends Evac | Combat Footage Show
At 6pm EST Funker Host @ronnieadkins discusses:- #israel - #gaza - #palestine-------Ways to Support Us:Download the Mobile App: https://funker530.app.link/3M...
www.youtube.com 
Are we all onboard with the govt plan to let the jews kill thousands of people yet? Do we all agree our tax dollars should be used to kill Hamas and Palestine? Have we been fooled into believing one is the boogeyman and the other is the saint?
Vaccinated=Saint
Unvaccinated=Boogeyman.
In the end, itll all be another lie.
Vaccinated=Saint
Unvaccinated=Boogeyman.
In the end, itll all be another lie.
As Clint Eastwood once said, "There is nothing wrong with shooting people... Just as long as the right people get shot".
Almost 50 years later, and I can't find a flaw in that statement.
Almost 50 years later, and I can't find a flaw in that statement.
Well, I kind of look at it this way. Where would you rather spend your vacation if you had to choose? (Assuming there was no war going on). Israel, or Yemen?
It's interesting that in about a weeks time all the folks that were bitching about their opinions being cancelled are now the same people saying you can only have one opinion. No discussion allowed. You're either with us or against us. Where have we heard that before. Oh yeah...
Well, one of the things presented in the book is which type of war is better?
A) A war where you try to prevent as many non-combatant casualties as possible and limit infrastructure damage, but lasts a long ass time.
-Or-
B) Total war where you demolish everything, but the war ends quicker so people can move on with life.
However, that’s really not what he means to which war would be just or unjust. He applies that for reasons to go to war, and not the (just or unjust reason). The conduct of the war is really a follow on.
Does the book have practical applications in the conduct of real life warfare? Not really, tbh. It’s written by a philosopher so it’s an exercise in thought.
Maybe our resident philosopher @sirhrmechanic can chime in?
SPOILER ALERT!!
-Israel is engaging in a just war per the book.-
What does it say about the other side that is fighting for their god and holy land? Just or not.
War is a last resort, diplomacy by other means and only just to the point where one side wants to return in good faith to the negotiation table.
War is based on interest. There should be a valid interest.
Do we see much of that - no.
And I don’t think we ever will until the negotiation class once again has some skin in the game.
Our major power stomping on smaller powers conflicts allows the likes of Lindsey Graham to don a coat of armor and talk big knowing he will never experience gunfire.
I agree that war should be the last resort, but when we go in it should be total war.
However, that would likely lead to a draft, which I do not support.
I don't see Isreal flattening Gaza completely and then salting the earth as a bad thing.
If Tiajuana's democratically elected government was launching thousands of missiles every year into San Diego, what would we do?
If Tiajuana's democratically elected government was launching thousands of missiles every year into San Diego, what would we do?
Nowadays?
we would launch public support for them to do so, pay them to do so and ask for more. Hell we’d probably even give them the weapons. Have you seen this country lately? i suppose to be fair, not sure if any of the predecessors told everyone else to get the fuck out.
Last edited:
Exactly
"This is the NEW “Iron Dome”—but where interceptions cost $50k per launch, this will be .5¢"
It's always good when war becomes cost effective.
It's always good when war becomes cost effective.
"This is the NEW “Iron Dome”—but where interceptions cost $50k per launch, this will be .5¢"
It's always good when war becomes cost effective.
I appreciate your post and it’s spot on (wasn’t lost on me).
In this case I’m all for it since it’s a defensive weapon and the cost to shoot down cheap homemade rockets was previously unsustainable.
Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state.
Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Empire, not a Palestinian state. Godfrey IV of Boulogne, known as Godfrey de Bouillon, conqueror of Jerusalem in 1099-Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state.-Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state.
Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian statehood.
Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE!
This babe did her homework, and knows her shit! Very impressive!
Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Empire, not a Palestinian state. Godfrey IV of Boulogne, known as Godfrey de Bouillon, conqueror of Jerusalem in 1099-Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state.-Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state.
Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state.
Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian statehood.
Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE!
This babe did her homework, and knows her shit! Very impressive!
As suspected near all the weapons they use are DIY no one is shipping shit in from outside.
"This is the NEW “Iron Dome”—but where interceptions cost $50k per launch, this will be .5¢"
It's always good when war becomes cost effective.
I can only imagine a Laser capacitor charging for a barrage of rockets , and i am pretty certain that when Raytheon sends the bill for iron dome interceptors it will be way more than 50k$ a pop
Rockets flying from Gaza and you are looking at this between each 5$ shot and its probably going much much slower
I have no problem with Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Concentrated the next projected 4 years of war planning into about three weeks.
If they had the same weapons and sent them back our way, still ok with that? Lots of death, anger, sorrow, and devestation.
I get your point, get in, destroy, get out. But a lot of innocent people get hurt. We need some rules for war.
They did the same thing with you all and vaccines. Not gonna argue and litigate over your right to challenge vaccines. They just chopped you all and moved on.
Even an MMA fight has rules. If people become animals, we all become animals and life means nothing. Not sure that is the world you or I want.
The post a few pages back approves of the killing of non combatants including children to win. It got 30 likes, loves, and many quotes acknowledging its greatness. I’m assuming these people while maybe not aligning with Hamas, approves and admires their alleged tactics. Its sick shit if you ask me. Its no different than the campaign to vaxx children to death.
Everybody is free to an opinion.
I dont wanna die for the actions of my govt. I disagree with their choices 95% of the time. Id prefer not be collateral damage. I dont have kids or family, but I'd imagine that would even be a harder pill to swallow.
If the nazis or Japan would have had the same weapons… they would have used them.
Well, I am not a philosopher, I'm an historian. @Maggot is our resident philosopher. Really! Trained in it and rather capable, despite some points of view here on SH.
So as an historian, I deal in (as best as possible) facts and interpretations that can be supported, cited and justified. So when one examines any book or 'source' material, one should delve into the background research AND the predilictions of the author. Why did they write the book? What 'angle' are they coming from? Are they an historian with strongly-supported source materials? Or are they from the '60's "Revisionist" school? Is their book designed to make a political point? Or accurately record an event? Who funded the book (happens more than you think?) Who Published it. Who reviewed it and what did they say about it?
Those are just a handful of the many questions that one asks when examining the veracity of a book, paper, article, etc. There are many more.
It's no different than the intelligence game. What are your sources? What are their motivations. The acronym MICE is always used as part of evaluating a source (not that I'd know, I was in Marketing.) But Money, Ideology, Conscious and Ego are all motivations for people who betray their countries and provide intelligence. Really, the best sources are those motivated by Money and Conscience. They tend to be pretty reliable. Pay for play or... kept up at night. Those motivated by Ideology are a second. They may not believe in 'their' system. But do they believe in yours? Maybe... maybe not. Then there are the 'ego' types who betray their country, colleagues, service or whatever for ego. They think they are so important that they can change the world with their 'efforts.'
Authors (and historians) are no different. Are they looking to make a buck? Create some kind of basis for a political view? Thinking that they can change history? Influence future events? Why would the author write that book.
Once you have that 'analyzed' you can decide how much faith to put into that source.
So why not take a look at "Michael Walzer" and decide what his book 'Just and Unjust Wars' is really all about.
Michael Walzer - Wikipedia
Read about his views. His education. Who hired him and where he works? Who has written papers based on his works... who he supports politically and who calls him in for congressional testimony to support their views? I won't say what I think of him or his book. Read his background and make up your own mind. Everyone here is smart enough to decide how valid his treatise is. Or not. Or, more likely, valid in the context of their own world view. Based on facts.
One does not work as a philosopher when it comes to history. Philosophy provides the basis for religions, political systems, how one lives their lives. It is an important and, these days, an overlooked field. But the great philosophers were just that... great! And they shaped a lot of history. But they didn't record or interpret it. That's for us mere mortals.
Cheers,
Sirhr
PS. Thanks for the label "Philosopher." It is actually rather a great compliment. But I never rose to that level. My degrees are as a technical writer, a futurist and an historian. So I am generally rather confused when it comes to everything. I'm merely an examiner of events past... and always trying to cipher out the future. And usually getting it wrong.
Last edited:
Dude watch the drone thing going on now.
No matter the manner of killing sick fucks going to use it.
Our gov wants nukes lit off now to justify a mass culling.
What do you do when the biggest threat to your life is your own Gov?
Similar threads
