@M8541Reaper shoots AXSR a lot. He’d be a good one to chime in for you1k-1mile max. have ranges near me for both that I'm going to get a membership for.
Also - i've saved like 50 pics from this thread as inspiration, AT with thumbhole is preety beautiful rifle. So is AXSR with 18.5 proofSo I think they are equally "cool" since that is preety important. I have a Helios QD Ti supressor I plan to run with .308 and 6.5 creed already. So I figure with the TI supressor direct thread (weighs about as much as a muzzle break or less), and a proof 18.5, the AXSR would be relatively maneuverable?
If you plan to shoot to a mile and prs comps are only a maybe thing then get the AXSR. The calibers are more suited for a mile. Not that a 6.5/260 or 6.5 PRC can’t do it. But the 7/30/338 cals do it better
You can always make an AXSR a 6.5. You can’t make an AT a 338 LM so there’s that
The AXSA and AXMC/AXSR are just a taller/blockier design then a AT or ATX. At least from my experience. Which just makes them harder to maneuver or shoot from different positions
Again not that it can’t be done. But there’s a noticeable difference from my AT to what my AXMC was. My ATX should be closer to my AT for feel. So far just from dry firing and what not it seems much closer
Just for reference I run my AT and ATX cheek risers in their lowest positions. The ATX has the same optic and spuhr mount as the AXMC had. With the MC and the NF 7-35 my cheek rest was in the highest position. Even with that I had to have the wiebad cheek pad on it to get to the correct height. Had I kept the gun I’d have added something under it to get even higher.
Last edited: