Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t think people are seriously putting others down just because they bought an expensive gun. It also seems like most people here actually shoot their AIs. I know I do. People post non AI guns in an AI gun thread (despite aics threads existing), so playful ribbing ensues.Guys that think they can talk down on or be disrespectful to people because their rifle is more expensive are sad.
Ain’t nothing soft about getting sick of the childish bullshit in here. Some of us have been here the entire time before this was the main theme of AI threads and before the hide was on this server and first hand seen the evolution of soft.
But I would buy one for my kids and not the other.Those are like a midget tranny....
But I would buy one for my kids and not the other.
So
Different
They need to update again with a ATx or AXSA style stock
nice property.
I get what you mean, I get the jokes and you highly likely get what I’m getting at. We’ve heard the ‘hahaha you’re poor joke’ for years.
Don’t you think it’s time it’s not the main theme of AI threads?
Because it’s only really AI threads that this happens in. Same thing happens with Staccato in the handgun world, which is also amusing.
We are here for AI’s yes. This running joke would unanimously win the beating a dead horse on the Hide title.
::Insert “Ok Boomer” meme here::Guys that think they can talk down on or be disrespectful to people because their rifle is more expensive are sad.
Ain’t nothing soft about getting sick of the childish bullshit in here. Some of us have been here the entire time before this was the main theme of AI threads and before the hide was on this server and first hand seen the evolution of soft.
Yes....I bought an AXSA that already had oneDid you ever find the solution you were looking for to make your AT a folder?
Kent
I need you to stop dunking on me by posting photos of your attached garage. I will never have one and it hurts my single feeling.View attachment 8587673
Just to appease ze poors.
I wanted to shoutout Jason Dellinger and Performance Weapons Systems at shootpws.com
He modified my .300 win magazines for my AXSR and I shot 20 .300PRC rounds without issue. Looks like they have a modified Red 3D printed follower. I've been out for preety serious surgery and getting back into it.
Thanks Jason if you are out there, worked great.
I do prefer my TRG over my AI aswell these days. The ergonomics fit me way bester.The boys pretty much get the AT-X in 6br now that they like to reload. Although they both prefer the action on the trg22 to the AI.
View attachment 8587679
I wanted to shoutout Jason Dellinger and Performance Weapons Systems at shootpws.com
He modified my .300 win magazines for my AXSR and I shot 20 .300PRC rounds without issue. Looks like they have a modified Red 3D printed follower. I've been out for preety serious surgery and getting back into it.
Thanks Jason if you are out there, worked great.
Reading thru it now, thanks.![]()
AI ASXR 300 PRC Magazine Issue
We recently had a customer drop off an AI ASXR in 300 PRC to have the barrel shortened for suppressor use and the scope mounted. When we did an initial function check, the rifle would feed a few rounds and stop due to rounds tilting nose down in the magazine. The stack could be reset by...www.snipershide.com
Good thread about it, I had these issues.
can only design perfection around so many variables.Reading thru it now, thanks.
How come AI doesn’t make a mag that works 100% with the PRC?
People offering one-off assistance on $10k+ rifles only strengthens ai's ecosystem imo.Glad you're pleased with the upgrades. It's a shame that we have to offer this service for an otherwise fine rifle, but I'm glad that we could help. Thanks for posting your feedback here. I don't advertise this because I don't want backlash from AI about not being "authorized".
How come AI doesn’t make a mag that works 100% with the PRC?
I agree and I'm the 3rd party. The issue is a common one within the industry. We have to tune the single stack mags for our hunting rifles for the same reason. The problem is 300 PRC has the same case head diameter as 300 Win Mag and manufacturers assume that magazines for 300 Win Mag will also work for 300 PRC provided that the mag will accommodate the extra length of the 300 PRC cartridge.Just my opinion but one should NOT have to turn to 3rd party to get a rifle to feed well from its own magazine. This is utterly unacceptable.
.300PRC is being utilized by DOD and NAVSPECWAR and Lord knows who else. Not like it’s some boutique 7mmBrokeBack cartridge or whatever.
Don’t sell a rifle chambered in .300 PRC if you’re not going to make a magazine for it that works out the gate.
Ahemsome boutique 7mm
I wanted to shoutout Jason Dellinger and Performance Weapons Systems at shootpws.com
He modified my .300 win magazines for my AXSR and I shot 20 .300PRC rounds without issue. Looks like they have a modified Red 3D printed follower. I've been out for preety serious surgery and getting back into it.
Thanks Jason if you are out there, worked great.
PM sentI agree and I'm the 3rd party. The issue is a common one within the industry. We have to tune the single stack mags for our hunting rifles for the same reason. The problem is 300 PRC has the same case head diameter as 300 Win Mag and manufacturers assume that magazines for 300 Win Mag will also work for 300 PRC provided that the mag will accommodate the extra length of the 300 PRC cartridge.
300 PRC has less taper in the case than 300 Win Mag, so magazines set up for Win Mag often do not feed well and need feed lip adjustments in single stack mags even if they are long enough for the 300 PRC. We both shorten the feed lips and adjust the openings on these mags.
The AI AXSR mags with the plastic base plates compound this issue by being a double stack mag. So, the round stack literally binds on itself in the magazine because there is not enough room in the magazine body for the wider cases just below the neck. This is what prevents the round stack from popping up so that the rounds can be fed into the chamber. Instead, the rounds stick nose down and try to feed into the front of the magazine.
The reason that AI has the issue is that the AXSR was originally designed for the US military ASR (Advanced Sniper Rifle) solicitation, which at the time specified .308, 300 Win Mag, and 338 Lapua. As such, the magazines are desinged around those cartridge families. 300 Norma and 338 Norma still use a Lapua bolt face, so the 338 Lapua mags should run those well. 300 PRC while it uses a 300 Win Mag bolt face, is not the same cartridge and is not just a longer 300 Win Mag so there are issues running that cartridge in those magazines. AI probably assumed that since the cartridge diameter is the same and the magazine will accept the extended length of the 300 PRC that they were compatible.
I'm assuming that AI doesn't think there are enough users shooting 300 PRC or the problem is not widespread enough to warrant a revised magazine. It's a shame because after we upgrade the mags, they still run 300 Win Mag just fine. They would not need a proprietary 300 PRC mag.
We address the issue in 3 areas: 1.) We tune the magazine feed lips for proper function with 300 PRC. 2.) We tweak the magazine body to get as much room as we can for the round stack 3.) We install a new follower that moves the magazine spring forward to provide more pressure at the front of the cartridge to help with feeding.
You’d need a third party reach around just to get it in the hole
I bet BurtG will adjust the mag lips for me!You’d need a third party reach around just to get it in the hole
I agree and I'm the 3rd party. The issue is a common one within the industry. We have to tune the single stack mags for our hunting rifles for the same reason. The problem is 300 PRC has the same case head diameter as 300 Win Mag and manufacturers assume that magazines for 300 Win Mag will also work for 300 PRC provided that the mag will accommodate the extra length of the 300 PRC cartridge.
300 PRC has less taper in the case than 300 Win Mag, so magazines set up for Win Mag often do not feed well and need feed lip adjustments in single stack mags even if they are long enough for the 300 PRC. We both shorten the feed lips and adjust the openings on these mags.
The AI AXSR mags with the plastic base plates compound this issue by being a double stack mag. So, the round stack literally binds on itself in the magazine because there is not enough room in the magazine body for the wider cases just below the neck. This is what prevents the round stack from popping up so that the rounds can be fed into the chamber. Instead, the rounds stick nose down and try to feed into the front of the magazine.
The reason that AI has the issue is that the AXSR was originally designed for the US military ASR (Advanced Sniper Rifle) solicitation, which at the time specified .308, 300 Win Mag, and 338 Lapua. As such, the magazines are desinged around those cartridge families. 300 Norma and 338 Norma still use a Lapua bolt face, so the 338 Lapua mags should run those well. 300 PRC while it uses a 300 Win Mag bolt face, is not the same cartridge and is not just a longer 300 Win Mag so there are issues running that cartridge in those magazines. AI probably assumed that since the cartridge diameter is the same and the magazine will accept the extended length of the 300 PRC that they were compatible.
I'm assuming that AI doesn't think there are enough users shooting 300 PRC or the problem is not widespread enough to warrant a revised magazine. It's a shame because after we upgrade the mags, they still run 300 Win Mag just fine. They would not need a proprietary 300 PRC mag.
We address the issue in 3 areas: 1.) We tune the magazine feed lips for proper function with 300 PRC. 2.) We tweak the magazine body to get as much room as we can for the round stack 3.) We install a new follower that moves the magazine spring forward to provide more pressure at the front of the cartridge to help with feeding.
Nice casting couch. I see what you did there...The boys pretty much get the AT-X in 6br now that they like to reload. Although they both prefer the action on the trg22 to the AI.
View attachment 8587679
Just checked mine and snugged it up a little. Good tipView attachment 8587886
Here’s your annual “check your folder button retaining pin” reminder gents.
Was casing up the rifle today and felt something hit me in the chest. Looked down and it was the button![]()
I ain’t a boomer but yes that’s usually response number 2 here::Insert “Ok Boomer” meme here::
LE308TTMK2?LE308TTMK2 is not what I’d use for precision shooting, but great for two legged critters behind glass or otherwise.
Taking out the trash. I can’t believe I used to shoot this tranny Remington in a chassis. Sure it identifies as an AI and shoots sub MOA but that tranny rifle had to go.
View attachment 7945360
Yeah my bad on the P/N.LE308TTMK2?
Is that just LE308TT2?
It’s cool. But the constant rubbish in this AI picture thread isn’t.
The hide has changed over the years, unlike actual AI’s which are no fuss get the job done systems, a number of new age AI owners have bought an expensive piece of kit and think it’s a flex on people to own acting like misbehaved children. The irony.
This is not to discredit those who really run AI’s. There’s a lot of posing going on. It’s everywhere these days in everything.
For the misbehaved kids or full grown men at the back yes I can afford AI’s and so what, move along. This is Snipershide.
No crying we all good