PortaJohn

any back information about what is going on with this?
Why were they there, did someone make a call?
or was it mother making a call, because father was calling his daughter a girl and MOM believes different?

Many cliks later , I saw messages that his daughters were taken but eventually he got them back. Never heard what caused the standoff
 

This is what happens when Freedom of Speech is not guaranteed via a constitution. Funny how all the freak progressives are still up in arms that Elon called a few of them out. For a progressive, freedom is always one way. ALWAYS.

The UK has fallen. Time to look for another friend, perhaps one in our own hemisphere...maybe like Agentina if they can avoid yet another revolution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryle
At least it wasn't carbon.

I love this kind of science. It spewed out 5,500 tons of sulfur dioxide.
Question: How do you know that it was 5,500 tons?
Answer: We're scientists we know this kind of stuff. Prove me wrong.
 
I love this kind of science. It spewed out 5,500 tons of sulfur dioxide.
Question: How do you know that it was 5,500 tons?
Answer: We're scientists we know this kind of stuff. Prove me wrong.
so,
The volcano released 6 months of driving in the USA, in one day. hmm. Climate Change
"Road vehicles in the United States released 11,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (SO₂) in 2023."

1744637937372.png
 
WTF is up with this ?


It's just like when I go through TSA. I refuse to let them take my picture. Why ? It's very simple. THEY DON'T NEED IT !

Just like THEY DON'T NEED "REAL ID".

Go back 10, 20, 30, 40 years. We all got along JUST FINE without this shit. The "NEW" stuff is of ZERO BENEFIT to me. Therefore, FUCK YOU !
The reason for Real ID is that many states issued drivers licenses to illegals.
 

“New York state bought hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of medical equipment at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, including ventilators and x-ray machines, that now sits unused in storage facilities across the state, missing recommended maintenance and costing taxpayers storage expenses,” said Napoli's office. Of the equipment that requires ongoing maintenance, auditors found that 90% of it is past due, with no process or contract in place to handle that need. Failure to keep up with maintenance risks voiding manufacturer warranties, and also rendering the equipment unusable in an emergency.
 
any back information about what is going on with this?
Why were they there, did someone make a call?
or was it mother making a call, because father was calling his daughter a girl and MOM believes different?
i think this is related with some details.

 
i think this is related with some details.

ok, Lots of stuff happened, good background..
but here's my opinion on just one small part.... The parents have a custodial order. Now, some states take custody agreements seriously, and some states like MI, well, they don't.
If there is an agreement and agreed time; ONE parent doesn't get to say, "hey, I'm going to keep the kid longer".. ah fk' no, that's not how it works.
Father is in the wrong here. When a MALE parent that starts 'disregarding' the law and police have to show up, bad things will happen to the man. The MAN is causing the issue, shit's gonna happen. Men have NO rights in Family Court. Lawyers and Judges will tell you that the law is blind. The law is blind, towards men and their rights. Men and women ARE treated differently in Family Court!!
You don't have the right to send an email and state, I'm keeping the kid, come back later.
Then the father says, you are harassing us. No, she's just there to get their kid (so she can exercise her part of the pararenal agreement)

Remember a few years ago, when the father showed up to get his kid on Christmas and the mother refused. I believe the father got shot and killed by the 'boyfriend'.

As for the rest, that's some fk'd up shit.
When they asked for his daughter, he should of said, NO, I'm not giving or releasing her to you. Mom should of held baby, and refused to give it to CPS. Most states can't 'take' a kid without papers, BUT, if they show up and 'Ask' for the kid and you give them the kid,, well, you fell into the trap. If they were after the father, state will use excuse, kid was in danger or some crap. If mom was holding it, baby wasn't in 'immediate' danger. Lawyers can argue this one. It's a tricky and slippery slope.
Was that the mother of infant at 2:44 in the video?
 
Last edited:
  • Angry
Reactions: 10ring'r and Mwalex