i think this is related with some details.
In a shocking account, a Navy veteran reveals how Loudoun County authorities forcibly seized his one-month-old baby, raising grave concerns about due process and government overreach in America. This disturbing incident demands urgent attention.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
ok, Lots of stuff happened, good background..
but here's my opinion on just one small part....
The parents have a custodial order. Now, some states take custody agreements seriously, and some states like MI, well, they don't.
If there is an agreement and agreed time; ONE parent doesn't get to say, "hey, I'm going to keep the kid longer".. ah fk' no, that's not how it works.
Father is in the wrong here. When a MALE parent that starts 'disregarding' the law and police have to show up, bad things will happen to the man. The MAN is causing the issue, shit's gonna happen. Men have NO rights in Family Court. Lawyers and Judges will tell you that the law is blind. The law is blind, towards men and their rights. Men and women ARE treated differently in Family Court!!
You don't have the right to send an email and state, I'm keeping the kid, come back later.
Then the father says, you are harassing us. No, she's just there to get their kid (so she can exercise her part of the pararenal agreement)
Remember a few years ago, when the father showed up to get his kid on Christmas and the mother refused. I believe the father got shot and killed by the 'boyfriend'.
As for the rest, that's some fk'd up shit.
When they asked for his daughter, he should of said, NO, I'm not giving or releasing her to you.
Mom should of held baby, and refused to give it to CPS. Most states can't 'take' a kid without papers, BUT, if they show up and 'Ask' for the kid and you give them the kid,, well, you fell into the trap. If they were after the father, state will use excuse, kid was in danger or some crap. If mom was holding it, baby wasn't in 'immediate' danger. Lawyers can argue this one. It's a tricky and slippery slope.
Was that the mother of infant at 2:44 in the video?