So, the co-pilot moved the T handle to the up position instead of the one shaped like a little wheel/tire...
Basic position and feel should tell a blind man if he's got the correct handle...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Possible but very highly unlikely…every truck load in and out of every storage tank is tested, and it may have changed but when I was flying almost every load on the plane has a small sample pulled to check for contaminants.
Can actually increase thrust in some cases.. I’m old enough to have 750 hours on the KC-135A with water injection for takeoff! LoL
Not sure if your referring to military or civilian procedures but we do not do this after every refuel.There is a sump drain on the lowest point of each fuel tank. After refueling, the ground crew is supposed to do a sump check.
Typically, using a quart bottle on the drain tool, you'll get only a couple of tablespoons of water.
Actual contaminated fuel is super unlikely due to all of the pre-filtering in the distribution system.
Small amounts of water will just burn right off. The reason to remove any H2O is actually to prevent mold growth in the fuel tanks.
Not sure if your referring to military or civilian procedures but we do not do this after every refuel.
I remember back in the day we would do fuel samples at regular intervals but not after every refuel. I think it was weekly but it’s been 25 years. The line shack took care of that.Military.
Probably due to the limited amount of ground time, your aircraft most likely don't sweat up inside the tanks.
You don’t do it straight after refuel as you need to leave time for the water to settle in the bottom of the tanks.Military.
Probably due to the limited amount of ground time, your aircraft most likely don't sweat up inside the tanks.
You don’t do it straight after refuel as you need to leave time for the water to settle in the bottom of the tanks.
Boeing say you need to wait 4hrs after refuelling, or running the fuel pumps before doing fuel drains.
However large amounts of water isn’t usually an issue these days as all the newer aircraft have jet pumps that pull fuel out of the lowest part of the tank. I can’t remember how much unusable fuel is usually in each tank, but without these pumps (not really a pump, just a Venturi from the normal pumps) water does definitely collect and need the sump drains done daily.
Gravity feed is required for certification as the engines must be able to continue operating if a total electrical failure occurs.The C-130 used jet pumps (venturi pumps) from the main boost pumps to pick up low areas and keep the sump box as full as possible.
F-16 uses little turbine pumps in the wings. They are powered by the boost pumps.
The F-15 didn't use any.
The 707/C-135 didn't use any extra scavenge type pumps.
The B-1B had a smaller scavenge pump at each wing tip and one in the Weapons bay tank. Transfer pumps were mounted at the aft end of each fuel tank since it flies slightly nose up
None on the H-53.
All of the aircraft were designed to allow suction feed in case of any primary boost pump failure. Then there's the crossfeed/crossover system which allows feeding any/all engines from the crossfeed manifold.
I don't doubt the civilian aircraft are much like this since the fuel systems operate on a lot of similar principles
Makes total sense.Gravity feed is required for certification as the engines must be able to continue operating if a total electrical failure occurs.
And whatever they would say could only be critical of the crew, or negatively affect Boeing share price.I'm guessing the Indian's asked the NTSB to take the lead. Boeing is a party to the investigation. Boeing cant say shit as a party to the investigation lest they be kicked off the investigation...
So you wont hear a peep from Boeing on this...
And whatever they would say could only be critical of the crew, or negatively affect Boeing share price.
If it was an aircraft fault, Boeing stands to lose a lot. If it was a crew/maintenance fault, India ends up looking like a 3rd world shit hole. Sure, it could have been some incredibly rare occurrence that no one could possibly have predicted, but as a guy doing this job, you know for a fact it is almost always an error by operators or an equipment fault.thats a very bold statement seeing as how nobody knows what happened...