Is it Easier to Shoot Sub MOA Further Out?

Airik Farley

Private
Minuteman
Mar 27, 2024
17
20
US
I've noticed that it seems easier to shoot sub MOA the further out I move the target. Is that normal, why is that? I understand that 1MOA @ 100y is 1 inch and at 300y it's 3 inches, but I don't feel like that should make it 3x easier since it's 3x as far. My expectations were that the difficultly would scale linearly with distance.

I only have access to a range that goes out to 300 yards but I've noticed that I struggle to shoot sub MOA at 100 yards, I normally average about 1-1.25 MOA at 100 yards. However when I move out to 300 yards I consistently shoot well under 1 MOA. On average I tend to shoot around 0.3 - 0.5 MOA at 300. Tonight I somehow shot a 0.16 MOA 3 round group at 300y with gusting winds which absolutely blows my mind. I doubt I'll ever achieve that again.

I'm shooting with Horney ELD-M 6.5 Creedmoor FYI.


shared_image-18~2.png
 
Last edited:
It should be “harder”, in that there are more variables involved (or more time for the various variables to act on your shot). You may be noticing a positive effect of having less magnification causing apparent movement of the reticle. Same reason some people seem to shoot better if they “zoom out” with their scope. Or, the shooting position might be up or down a little making the angle more comfortable or consistent which is allowing you to be more consistent shot to shot. If the gun is shooting that small at 300, it will shoot that small at 100 but you are doing something different.
 
One of the Litz books has a study on this. Going purely off memory here, I believe they used shoot-thru targets to print the same group at 100 and 300, while arranging it so either a 100 yard or 300 yard aim point could be used. If I recall correctly the result was basically "aim small, miss small" where the groups were tighter at both distances when using the 300 yard aim point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doubloon
I have seen that and most every time its either been a parallax issue, or its a bullet base transition to bearing body vs that rifles crown issue.
Should the transition not be perfect and the crown the same the gas gives the bullet a slight yaw, at the muzzle. Then it takes a few 100's of a second. for rotational spin to counter act that.
Different bullets or sometimes different lot numbers of same cures it or same bullets in another gun. The crown will tell you if its happening as you will see more gas markings on one side than another. However you will need high magnification to see the diff, as the naked eye will not detect it.

edit for fat fingering spelling
 
Last edited:
Has a lot to do with your distance and today’s modern ballistics.
300 yds isn’t the same 300yds it was 60yrs ago
Modern cartridges, powders, brass, projectiles and barrel advancement makes it much easier than our grandfathers had it.
The challenge begins when atmospherics start factoring in. And that increases with distance.
Try to find somewhere where you can shoot
5-600yds. Better yet, 800+ and you’ll see the elements begin to fight you. Not to mention your breathing, heartbeat, thoughts in your brain, etc etc.
 
I shoot a lot at 100, 300, 385, and 650. I've never had a trend to shoot tighter at 300 - 650 than I did at 100.

I wish I could.

As said above, shoot more groups at each distance, average, and please share what you have found out.
 
i have noticed the same thing, i have wonderd if it was not mental. taking more care in fundamentals because the tgt was further away. i have chalked it up to a mystery.
 
All other things being equal, swerving motion of the rotationaly stabilized projectiles is usually the most intensive in first 100 yards or so. Once the pitching & yawing phenomena get damped out, the flight regarding centar of mass of the bullet is more closely aproximated by the point-mass trajectory model. Therefore, it's possible to observe increased MOA groups at closer range than further away. However, when decent ammo is fired from accuracy barrels the effect is pretty negligible from practical standpoint ( I'd say less than 1/2 of a caliber up to 100 yards)
 
All other things being equal, swerving motion of the rotationaly stabilized projectiles is usually the most intensive in first 100 yards or so. Once the pitching & yawing phenomena get damped out, the flight regarding centar of mass of the bullet is more closely aproximated by the point-mass trajectory model. Therefore, it's possible to observe increased MOA groups at closer range than further away. However, when decent ammo is fired from accuracy barrels the effect is pretty negligible from practical standpoint ( I'd say less than 1/2 of a caliber up to 100 yards)
Impossible. A bullet doesn’t “swerve”. You could be thinking of the yawing of an arrow in flight, but that is still flying on a straight line through the arrows center axis. Even though it is flexing up and down. A bullet can’t do that. Too short and rigid. Also, laws of motion already decided that about an object in motion tends to stay in motion till acted upon by a greater force etc.
 
Depending many things, high speed footage says otherwise. Everything perfect, no it won't.
The bullet still travels in a straight line other than the drop from gravity. It might wobble, but that won’t make it travel left then back right. If it leaves the barrel and starts traveling .001 degrees left then it will continue on that path unless a greater force pushes it back the other way. I think sir Isaac newton already figured this out for us. The point of the thread still being whether the op can shoot smaller groups at 300 yards vs 100 yards and as several have said-go shoot 10 round groups at different distances and see what happens.
 
There is, likely, a shooter component to this. You know…

You’re laid out prone at the 100 yard line, the end of your sniper-pro shooting mat fluttering gently in the light (4.3 mph according to the kestrel) breeze. Your position is rock steady. The new $4000 bipod is really paying off. And, the custom made rear bag allows for adjustments that are so small, and so precise, that you can’t even tell you are making them. There’s a small mountain of gleaming brass to your right. All of that ammunition was well spent. Your zero is PERFECT. The crosshairs of your scope are exactly quartering the bullseye. Now is the time. Position? Rock solid. Sight alignment? Square and true. Respiratory pause? Yep. Then, The Voice. “Send it.” Squeeze, bang, freeze. You drill the bull. Marky Mark is just a fuckin’ actor. Cycle the action. “Re-engage.” Frickin’ A, that one caught the edge of the first. “Re-engage!” Clover-leaf? This group is gonna be awesome. “Re-engage, sniper.” He’ll yeah, brother. That’s four touching. One more and I’m probably the best rifleman that’s ever lived. “Re-engage!” What. The. Actual. Fuck. No, I called that one. I mean, 1.2 moa is still pretty good. It’s a flyer. Only the first 4 really count. Fucking Hornady!

But, at distances where you can’t see your impacts on paper…

Where’d that one go? Don’t know, send another. Well, now? Fuck if I know. Just shoot 3 more and we’ll check after. Damn, that’s a fine group. I know, right? I wasn’t even really trying. Just put the cross hair on the bull and squeeze.