• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Boston Marathon Explosion

Even the Russians told Billy Boy Clinton that it was a very bad idea to accept Chechen immigrants. But hey the D's know whats best for us...
 
I'm very curious to find out who done it and why. I do not think this was Al Qaeda. They would have taken the whole block out...

Al Qaeda runs the place where these two kids are from. But there's really no point to taking out the whole block/city when taking out a few people has the same effect. The effect that a big bomb vs. a small bomb has is the same in terms of how we (the US) deals with it. In other words, they know that our legislators are going to force more and more knee-jerk laws and regulations down our throats regardless of the bomb size. More laws and regulations, are how they are beating us, i.e. we'll beat ourselves for them.
 
Al Qaeda runs the place where these two kids are from. But there's really no point to taking out the whole block/city when taking out a few people has the same effect. The effect that a big bomb vs. a small bomb has is the same in terms of how we (the US) deals with it. In other words, they know that our legislators are going to force more and more knee-jerk laws and regulations down our throats regardless of the bomb size. More laws and regulations, are how they are beating us, i.e. we'll beat ourselves for them.

Smart bastards, aren't they? Why don't we take a few pages out of their playbook and really stick it to 'em...
 
If you've ever seen the movie "Four Lions", the storyline is quite relevant to the current attack.
 
Supposedly the bastard was hiding in a boat under the cover and they took him down.

I hope it's true, good riddance.
 
I would have a few questions for the surviving suspect:

1) How did he get admission to the University, and the scholarship? Was he subject to the same conditions of admission as the other students?
2) Was he ever investigated for suspected ties to Caucasian Wahhabist cells?
3) Did he ever pledge allegiance to al Qaeda? If so, what did we know about it? Was he placed under surveillance? If yes, did he know that?
4) After he visited Russia last year did he begin promoting radical Islam after his return?
5) Is there any connection between him and the Saudi cell that was identified in the immediate aftermath of the bombings?
 
Especially #5 Graham. Something fishy about that angle. What's the hurry all the sudden to get him out of country? Especially with all the Saudi wahabbi radicals involved in terror plots?

I'd be taking a real hard look at the mosque they attended in Boston.
 
Does anyone think that something about all of this smells to high heaven? Last I heard the media reporting was that he couldn't talk because he had a throat injury. I may be wrong, but in the picture of the kid being arrested, it looks to me like he is being given a field tracheotomy. That wouldn't be that unusual for a throat injury, but why was it not reported that he had a trach? Is it normal for "ATF Police", as his patch says with nothing else idenitfying as medical, to being doing this kind of procedure? Not trying to make it sound like a conspriacy but when things don't add up...... I don't know.
 
Does anyone think that something about all of this smells to high heaven? Last I heard the media reporting was that he couldn't talk because he had a throat injury. I may be wrong, but in the picture of the kid being arrested, it looks to me like he is being given a field tracheotomy. That wouldn't be that unusual for a throat injury, but why was it not reported that he had a trach? Is it normal for "ATF Police", as his patch says with nothing else idenitfying as medical, to being doing this kind of procedure? Not trying to make it sound like a conspriacy but when things don't add up...... I don't know.

Don't question the offical story or else you will be labeled a infowars loving conspiracy theorist. Look at all those bullet holes !! lol

 
Last edited:
Those who look for conspiracies, see conspiracies everywhere...

Personally, I question everything I see and hear. I don't immediately doubt it, but I ask myself "Does this make sense? Is this reasonable?". If that is looking for conspiracies, so be it. Alot of people believe word for word whatever is spewed from the idiot box, internet or whatever. It is getting worse by the day and our society reflects that.
 
Those who look for conspiracies, see conspiracies everywhere...


Then go ahead and follow to slaughter. In the last few years I have began questioning everything. If theres 1 thing you can agree with everybody on, its that the Govt is Untruthful. Benghazi? Fast/Furious? War on Drugs? Drones on American soil? Im sure Im forgetting a ton of other scandals. But you get the point. Our Govt WILL leave you for dead and cover you up as if you didn't exist. All for some politicians agenda
 
Those who look for conspiracies, see conspiracies everywhere...

While somewhat true, you cannot discount the fact the lately everything we've been told Bengazi/F&F/etc./etc. has ended up being a lie and a cover-up so after years of being lied to and seeing so called "conspiracy-theories" end up being far more true than tin-foil-hat worthy. Personally, the lies that have been exposed in the last few years have made me seriously doubt the official "story/narrative" of even pre-Obama events here in the U.S. Take that and expand it to Boston and I have no doubt there's more going on then we're being told, is what we're not being told a conspiracy? I dunno, but given the governments track record, there's a very good chance that there's FAR more to this story than we're being told.

So don't be so quick to marginalize people/ideas that run counter to the official narrative we're being told, because at least lately, the story ended up being a lie.
 
Personally, the lies that have been exposed in the last few years have made me seriously doubt the official "story/narrative" of even pre-Obama events here in the U.S.

Sounds like someone's third eye has been pried open.
 
a SH member bears this quote (presumably fron a movie),on his box:
" Whenever there is any doubt, there is no doubt.
that's the first thing they teach you_
Who taught you? _
I don't remenber. Thats's the second thing they teach you_"
Seems appropriate
 
A naive question regarding Craft presence at the bombing, it seems to me that their employees might have the best training outside operational soldiers in prevention and reaction to this type of event.

Would a US agency hire them because we aren't allowed to conduct military operations inside the US by the posse comitatus act?
If so, why would said agency admit any responsibility to the mainstream media, especially considering the outcome.
 
A naive question regarding Craft presence at the bombing, it seems to me that their employees might have the best training outside operational soldiers in prevention and reaction to this type of event.

Would a US agency hire them because we aren't allowed to conduct military operations inside the US by the posse comitatus act?
If so, why would said agency admit any responsibility to the mainstream media, especially considering the outcome.

How do you figure this? First off, anyone can buy a "Craft International" hat or T-shirt off their website so we don't even know if those guys were really working for the company. Secondly, how do you figure they have the best training to prevent these types of acts? The bombs went off didn't they? So if in fact it was "Craft" dudes there, what was their purpose and what did they accomplish?
 
Mixed in with a little bit of TRUTH. Which is hard to come by now a days via the corporate controlled news.

That, IMO, is the big problem with sites like NaturalNews and InfoWars.

Folks look at government actions and information presented by the media with a critical eye - myself included. What aren't we being told, why aren't we being told it, why doesn't this pass a sniff test, etc. Discerning wheat from chaff is an important skill to have, especially when media is so often used to shape a message (ie. propaganda).

The aforementioned websites take a very small kernel or two of truth/reality and spin it into some web of nonsensical bullshit that gets lapped up by those who think "the gubment" can somehow keep secret a false flag bombing operation carried out against its own citizens when it can't keep the fact OBL was killed away from CNN prior to the press conference, or the fact that CIA believes North Korea does have the capability to place miniaturized nuclear warheads on certain missiles they posses without a dumbass Congressman spilling the beans during a hearing on live TV.

Some folks refuse to believe the Boston story...that is their prerogative. I'll agree that certain things don't quite add up...but certainly not to the point that I think men who took the oath of enlistment and served on the pointy end of the spear are striking out against their country's citizenry. And let's be honest - if they were, there'd have been a SHIT TON more people hurt & killed.
 
That, IMO, is the big problem with sites like NaturalNews and InfoWars.

Folks look at government actions and information presented by the media with a critical eye - myself included. What aren't we being told, why aren't we being told it, why doesn't this pass a sniff test, etc. Discerning wheat from chaff is an important skill to have, especially when media is so often used to shape a message (ie. propaganda).

Unfortunately, if you pick on one you kinda should pick on all.

FNC and MSNBC just serve to keep people from thinking on their own, in my opinion. People generally want their worldview to be correct, and it seems to me lately folks get inside the right or left wing echo chamber and let their opinions be shaped, and then they can stay tuned to see their opinions actually spouted on TV. Like some weird mind game, folks have a tough time with debate (this is generalizing, I know) because they didn't actually form the opinion, they heard Rush, or whatever the Lefty counterpart would be, but never really thought it out for themselves, which is why there's no defense of a theory possible.

The corporate media doesn't really have any reporters anymore, like guys who used to chase down stories, find actual witnesses and drill down into a story and actually give the reader some idea of depth in a story.

Americans want it in a fucking tweet, and trust me, that 140 character limit is about the average attention span of the 'freest nation on earth' right about now.

Most of what has been reported in Boston, (or anywhere for that matter) is regurgitated government releases, and they act like they went out and actually did something, and of course we have the occasional video interview with someone who can barely put together a noun and verb telling us how relieved they are that they can finally take their kids to daycare or go get fried food or some useless shit.

Media by 'unnamed government sources' reminds me of a man I read about a few years ago, he was a master of using media to control and move the thoughts of an entire country.

'Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.' That's Goebbels.

I think we know how that turned out. Although with time, even the story there has been shaped, reshaped and shaped again.

The pen has been used recently, (as the swords were during the Crusades), to make sure the story, after the survivors (those who would pass the story amongst their families and communities) are gone, is one that conforms to the meme that those who now tell the story want it to be.

Did anyone ever hear about the Bonus Army in school?

Hell I'd bet more than eighty percent of the under forty crowd don't know what an internment camp was in 1942.

Of course if you know that you may be privy to one of the greatest misdirections of all time, public education. We were bullshitted into Mann's theories, and America, that had the world's greatest thinkers and creators, possibly in the history of mankind, were now told that the Prussian model of education needed to be brought to our shores.

Prussia introduced this model of education so as to produce more obedient soldiers and serfs. (stolen from the interwebs)

I guess it worked, now anyone that questions government at all is a 'tin foil hat' kinda guy, or an 'Alex Jones' lackey.

But for the paper and the (printing)press I'd have no earthly idea that 56 men at one time thought so highly of freedom they actually penned their names to paper and declared thirteen colonies independent of the British Empire, an act so unthinkable now, that the words themselves could be deemed to be, oh hell I'll say it, 'revolutionary' in nature.

Patrick Henry didn't trust government, and he devoted his life to it, I'll take my lead from him.





sean
 
Last edited: