My better half pointed out that if the guy can pass a security clearance background check (and both she and I have had clearances at various times... she still maintains her Secret and I had TS for a while)... then how is a firearms background check supposed to be any panacea? As long as, by law and under HIPA (Healthcare Information Privacy Act), mental health information cannot be shared or included in a background check or shared at all!!! HIPA rules have an un-intended consequence of making it impossible for ones mental status to become part of a background check. Thus unless you meet other gating factors (felony, warrants, domestic violence, etc.) you will not be flagged in a background check.
I can't say that a change to HIPA would be an answer either, because MH is highly subjective and, as a result, without some very structured gates, etc. how is one going to decide who can/cannot pass a background check. One activist pshrink could deny thousands of people their rights. In something like mental health decisions, it would be way too easy to use subjective criteria to deny rights to a deserving citizen... so no solution there.
Which means... I don't have an answer. But no one wants to deal with the elephant in the room and that is the fact that most of these incidents have, at their core, people who should have been institutionalized or at least under much more scrutiny than political correctness and "Take two lithium's and call me in the morning" would allow.
At its core, however, is the old statement that Gun Control is not about guns... it is about control. That's as political as I'll get... I'd also add that I think everyone has done a great job of not letting this get political. Let's keep it that way.
One last thought (and question...) when I got my first TS clearance c. 1992, I was put through the ringer. Even my Boy Scout leader from the 1970's was contacted by the FBI... former co-workers... former bosses... my former neighbors in North Carolina were visited by an actual live pair of FBI agents! Lots of people were contacted and it was not an exercise in pencil-whipping some papers through. When my better half got her Secret clearance c. 2009, the process was still pretty rigorous. Either the process has massively changed, the standards are lower, political correctness is ruling... or lots of people are falling through the cracks. Anyone know what happens now? I have heard that a lot of the clearance work is being done by subcontract firms, not that this should affect the outcome....
Cheers and, again, my condolences to the friends/families of those affected...
Sirhr