Is Donna Brazile the next DNC staffer to "commit suicide"?

Dirty D

Resident Sommelier of cellulite
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 29, 2010
21,152
173,051
83
Your moms house
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donna-brazile-says-clinton-campaign-144436945.html Donna Brazile, former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee, opened up about the financial chaos within the DNC and said that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign gained control of the committee well before Clinton was the party’s nominee.
Politico featured an excerpt from Brazile’s book Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House, which comes out Nov. 7. In it, Brazile describes finding out that the Clinton campaign was keeping the DNC financially afloat, “for which [Clinton] expected to wield control of its operations,” Brazile writes.
Brazile says she was in the dark about the committee’s financial situation when she took over as interim chair. She writes that Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), the previous chair, “hadn’t been very interested in controlling the party.”

Brazile said Wasserman Schultz had allowed the DNC’s spending to get out of control before striking a deal with Clinton’s campaign “to sustain the DNC,” in the words of the Clinton campaign’s chief financial officer, Gary Gensler.

The excerpt concludes with Brazile’s phone call to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Clinton’s Democratic opponent in 2016, during which Brazile tells Sanders that Clinton’s campaign had taken power over the DNC’s finances long before Clinton defeated him.

“When I hung up the call to Bernie, I started to cry, not out of guilt, but out of anger,” Brazile writes. “We would go forward. We had to.”

Brazile has spoken about her displeasure with the DNC before, saying she “knew things were amiss” when she stepped in as interim chair.

Brazile resigned as a CNN contributor in late Oct. 2016 after WikiLeaks released an email showing that she’d received advance questions before a town hall event and gave them to Clinton’s campaign. Brazile later called that move “a mistake I will forever regret.”

Representatives for Clinton, Sanders, Wasserman Schultz and former President Barack Obama did not immediately reply to HuffPost’s request for comment.

 
So if Brazille thinks her party is that effed up is she now getting on the Trump train?

I suppose she will just be digging in and expecting twice the effort wont result in an even more effed up party.

When your whole platform is based on using other peoples money to spend as your own how does she find fault with Clinton?

I guess the Clintons are too Democratic for the Democrat Party.
 
They keep acting as if they would have won if Hillary hadn't taken over the party. They would have lost even worse with that socialist scumbag on the ticket.

LOL

Fuck the democraptic party
 
So if Brazille thinks her party is that effed up is she now getting on the Trump train?

No, never........Blind, unbridled Hubris and undying commitment to the liberal agenda. After being screwed by her, Brazille still gave Hillary the Q's to the debate.....Amazing. I would have loved it if she had dummied up fake questions and given them to Hillary, ala Animal House.

BTW, this is another lesson in how enemies inside the gates will take down a platform (or a Republic). Couldn't be happier that it happened to the dems.
 
They keep acting as if they would have won if Hillary hadn't taken over the party. They would have lost even worse with that socialist scumbag on the ticket.

I disagree.

Many of Bernie's proposals were out-to-lunch lunacy, but the fervor and passion of his supporters would have eclipsed and even rivaled Trump.

IMO, Bernie would have beat Trump as he would have won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
 
No, never........Blind, unbridled Hubris and undying commitment to the liberal agenda. After being screwed by her, Brazille still gave Hillary the Q's to the debate.....Amazing. I would have loved it if she had dummied up fake questions and given them to Hillary, ala Animal House. Revenge is a dish best served cold.....schadenfreude FTW.

BTW, this is another lesson in how enemies inside the gates will take down a platform (or a Republic). Couldn't be happier that it happened to the dems.
 
I disagree.

Many of Bernie's proposals were out-to-lunch lunacy, but the fervor and passion of his supporters would have eclipsed and even rivaled Trump.

IMO, Bernie would have beat Trump as he would have won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Agreed.

The lure of free stuff will over power the rational realization that Bernie's fantasies were just not possible.

Socialists are retarded because they are convinced that the response to the failure of socialism is always more socialism.
 
I disagree.

Many of Bernie's proposals were out-to-lunch lunacy, but the fervor and passion of his supporters would have eclipsed and even rivaled Trump.

IMO, Bernie would have beat Trump as he would have won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Would not without Ohio (18), Florida (29), and Georgia (16) which Sanders was not going to win.
 
Given what happened to Trotsky, you'd think that the Left would have less faith in their fellow travelers.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sicEBltXUeY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Would not without Ohio (18), Florida (29), and Georgia (16) which Sanders was not going to win.

Bernie wouldn't have needed Ohio, Florida, and Georgia...states Trump won anyway.

Flip Pennsylvania (20), Michigan (16) and Wisconsin (10) - three states that hadn't voted Republican for POTUS since at least 1988 - from Red to Blue and the electorial count becomes 278 Clinton, 260 Trump. Its very likely Bernie would have won Florida, too.

Bernie would have won vs. Trump because he would have generated one major thing Clinton didn't - enthusiasm. Sanders and Trump are different sides of the same populist coin, upsetting the traditional political apple cart. It would have been fun to watch...
 
Last edited:
So, Donna Brazile finally uncovered wrong doing?
She was complicit and actively participated by giving Clinton questions. Duh.

There were many independents that still voted for Clinton, I don;t think Bernie would have gotten as many of those.

If the libertarians hadn't chosen a stoner idiot to run, they might have made some headway.
 
23130727_143192722974245_6374137248685306542_n.jpg
 
I disagree.

Many of Bernie's proposals were out-to-lunch lunacy, but the fervor and passion of his supporters would have eclipsed and even rivaled Trump.

IMO, Bernie would have beat Trump as he would have won Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Sadly, I agree with this. How do you think a Socialist has been elected in Vermont... a state that until the late 1980's was considered "The most Republican" in the nation. Moonbats and socialists came out of the woodwork... then took over the urban areas of the state. Then voted the rural areas into irrelevance.

No... if Bernie had been the nominee, we would have had, not an avowed Socialist, but a full-up Stalinist Communist as our POTUS.

As for Brazile, I tend to agree with some of the talking heads from last couple of days... that her attack signals not only the end of the Clinton era, but that the Dem party is now going to go all Leon Trotsky on them. Hillary, and by extension Bill and that ugly, ambitious little twat Chelsea, are going to be in the crosshairs of everyone. Remember, that the 'socialist/progressive/leftard' wing of the party, run by Howard Dean, The Obamas, Elizabeth Warren, Harry Reid, Pelosi, Perez and, yes, still Bernie who is pulling strings like the party theologian that he is... are turning the Dems into the American Communist party. Vowing to take over... and the first thing they will do is execute the useful idiots who got them there. The fruits, nuts and flakes, as we call the granolas.

Which is good! Because they are going to, in the process, utterly alienate a lot of good people who were blue collar, old-timey JFK and Harry Truman type Democrats. No, I am not crazy about either of them, either. But by today's standards, they would be right of Donald Trump! Nothing wrong with Democrats, really. They have been the party of the blue collar back decades. But when they were infiltrated and taken over by the Communists... in a well-planned move dating back a century... to Woodrow Wilson... they were simply not going to allow the traditions of America to be a part of their ideology.

I don't think Brazile will be the next to commit suicide. Watch for Hillary to have an incapacitating stroke and not remember anything, ever again. Real or feigned. Who was that Mafia don in New York who spent years acting all batsh** crazy, mumbling to himself, wearing PJ's into Central Park.... etc. All to give the idea that he could not be the godfather because he was too retarded? That. Watch for that.

Cheers,

Sirhr
 
Sadly, I agree with this. How do you think a Socialist has been elected in Vermont... a state that until the late 1980's was considered "The most Republican" in the nation. Moonbats and socialists came out of the woodwork... then took over the urban areas of the state. Then voted the rural areas into irrelevance.

No... if Bernie had been the nominee, we would have had, not an avowed Socialist, but a full-up Stalinist Communist as our POTUS.

As for Brazile, I tend to agree with some of the talking heads from last couple of days... that her attack signals not only the end of the Clinton era, but that the Dem party is now going to go all Leon Trotsky on them. Hillary, and by extension Bill and that ugly, ambitious little twat Chelsea, are going to be in the crosshairs of everyone. Remember, that the 'socialist/progressive/leftard' wing of the party, run by Howard Dean, The Obamas, Elizabeth Warren, Harry Reid, Pelosi, Perez and, yes, still Bernie who is pulling strings like the party theologian that he is... are turning the Dems into the American Communist party. Vowing to take over... and the first thing they will do is execute the useful idiots who got them there. The fruits, nuts and flakes, as we call the granolas.

Which is good! Because they are going to, in the process, utterly alienate a lot of good people who were blue collar, old-timey JFK and Harry Truman type Democrats. No, I am not crazy about either of them, either. But by today's standards, they would be right of Donald Trump! Nothing wrong with Democrats, really. They have been the party of the blue collar back decades. But when they were infiltrated and taken over by the Communists... in a well-planned move dating back a century... to Woodrow Wilson... they were simply not going to allow the traditions of America to be a part of their ideology.

I don't think Brazile will be the next to commit suicide. Watch for Hillary to have an incapacitating stroke and not remember anything, ever again. Real or feigned. Who was that Mafia don in New York who spent years acting all batsh** crazy, mumbling to himself, wearing PJ's into Central Park.... etc. All to give the idea that he could not be the godfather because he was too retarded? That. Watch for that.

Cheers,

Sirhr

The destruction of Vermont and similar states is part of the 50 year plan. It should be expected Vt would be the place to have a Socialist senator.

What were the steps....

A. Collectivization in a sense of our farms from Family operations to Corporate farming. First step in eroding dependence. (Might have been too smart by half. The introduction of "organic" farming might bring back the capitalist small family farmer.)

B. Destroy our manufacturing base and end the capitalist penchant for providing for the people. Another step on the road to dependence.

C. Indoctrinate the young with propaganda in the education system. Have these Birkenstock beaters infest locations such as Brattleboro and Bennington requesting the local govts provide for them as they sit in the coffee shops working on their cultural appropriation of dred locks. Phase two.

D. Introduce a drug dependency problem. Give the slackers something to make them zombies, trick them into thinking what they are doing is the right thing and will result in the creation of Utopia, have them become more dependent on govt. Strike three.

Bernie probably got the plan for this when he was on his honeymoon in Moscow back in either the late 60s or early 70s.

I think you know what Bernies plan is for your "ilk" Sirhr.

Keep your powder dry.
 
Bernie's type has been dealt with before and it can happen again.

The weird thing is Bernies type usually sprung from a situation where those that have nothing and no prospects, seeking to better their lot in life, not realizing they are expected to surrender their freedom and morality in exchange for a lowest common denominator existence.

In this case we have the world's most pampered, and in many cases educated masses, living in a country that when run according to the Constitution provides the greatest opportunity to the masses desiring to tear down their fortunate position in order to subjugate themselves to a nanny state.

In both cases the revolution is lead by an educated privlidged elite that think they and only they can think for the masses and that if they control the people they will be able to provide a common level of poverty to all. As an aside none of the sacrifice of the new utopia applies to the privileged elite.