• Cold Bore Ritual Contest - Only a Few Hours Left To Enter!

    What’s your cold bore ritual, that one thing you always do before your first shot to set yourself up for success? Winner gets new limited edition Hide merch. Remember, subscribers have a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Rifle Scopes The ol' MOA vs MIL Dilemma

mbeavers1

Supporter
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 27, 2019
681
281
Montgomery, TX
So I am thinking of getting into the PRS shooting game at a range located close to my house. All of my optics up to this point have all been MOA and all of my shooting experience has been using this system. These rifles are all hunting rifles and I will be buying a dedicated rifle to shoot LR.

Lurking and reading, it seems that the majority of the participants are running Mil and that it is helpful to "speak the same language" as the other competitors. I am an engineer and very much favor consistency. I am curious to hear everyone's opinion on having a collection of 'mixed' systems. Should I pull the trigger on a Mil scope for competition and stay with the MOA hunting rifles or stick all to MOA?
 
I speak both, having grown up with MOA, Mil is really no different. Having a Mil scope with a regular duplex reticle though, that's a challenge. Having no way to measure for corrections.
 
I call shots all the time for MOA shooters and run MIL pretty much homogeneously these days. I'm decently quick at it. Much quicker with the MIL shooters.

You can simply multiply the MIL value by 3.438 to get the MOA value. That's about it. It's never quick "in the glass".
 
  • Like
Reactions: DustBun
MOA.

Mil is for Eurotards and wanabee snipers.
Yards and inches are far easier to understand than that other crap.

This.

Not sure why people can’t get it. Mil = metric and moA= non communist measurements.

Why use angular measurements when you can use inches and feet.
 
I can use both. I use MIL in the Army, but my stuff at home is MOA. Not sure why, but I like it that way. Being able to use both interchangeably is nice, and both work. It would be easier to use what others are so that they can give you corrections in the same language as your reticle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M8541Reaper
Which would be the best UOM for Nautical Miles?


Hi,

You must be one of those new millennial schooled Marines, lolol.....I know good and well us USN folks starting teaching you guys the tried and true DTP (Distance to Pirate) method in the early to mid 90s.

Sincerely,
Theis
 
Hi,

You must be one of those new millennial schooled Marines, lolol.....I know good and well us USN folks starting teaching you guys the tried and true DTP (Distance to Pirate) method in the early to mid 90s.

Sincerely,
Theis
See you kid but “Distance to Pirate” would be a pretty cool feature.
Elevation?
Up, 1.5 Pirates.
Wind?
Left, .6 Sea Cows
Sent it.
Arggg
 
Interesting that so many care what others use. Must be like fishing, they can't think for their self an have to know what kind of pole/line/reel/bait the thing was caught on.
Use what your comfortable with. And as far as up an wind calls, what are you going to do when it's just you an them/they aren't around? Learn your gear who cares what others use.
 
The OP did say PRS and communication, it does tip the scale to MIL, despite all the solid advice to learn whichever you choose.

But mil is better.
This. I think for tactical and PRS type matches most people stick to mils. The other thing I like about mils is the numbers are smaller, and to one decimal place. I want to dial 7.8mils for my 800 yard shot, not have my ballistic calculator tell me 26.62moa, and I have to decide if I want 26.50, or 26.75. Also makes turrets less cluttered.
 
This. I think for tactical and PRS type matches most people stick to mils. The other thing I like about mils is the numbers are smaller, and to one decimal place. I want to dial 7.8mils for my 800 yard shot, not have my ballistic calculator tell me 26.62moa, and I have to decide if I want 26.50, or 26.75. Also makes turrets less cluttered.
Laughing,...
 
OP -- As another engineer, I asked that same question awhile back. This is a VERY bitter fight (think CREO vs Siemens, Verilog vs VHDL, Java vs. C++, GNOME vs KDE, SystemD vs Init, etc.), but the long and short of it is that mils are the de facto standard these days. MOA has many different "variants", but a mil is a mil is a mil.

Here is the thread that answers your question...

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/current-state-of-moa-and-mil.6949029/
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbeavers1
OP -- As another engineer, I asked that same question awhile back. This is a VERY bitter fight (think CREO vs Siemens, Verilog vs VHDL, Java vs. C++, GNOME vs KDE, SystemD vs Init, etc.), but the long and short of it is that mils are the de facto standard these days. MOA has many different "variants", but a mil is a mil is a mil.

Here is the thread that answers your question...

https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/current-state-of-moa-and-mil.6949029/
Except is it a 6400 mil or a 6283 mil?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mws2000
IMG_2908.JPG