• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

1622039534_xjh47xqc8y.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ravenworks
I know of a radiologist, that has/had a only fans, she was politely asked " to look for another job " since the hospital she worked at, is a Christian based ( wont mention name). Never heard how that turned out, an invitation for law suit.
Also curious to know, who recognized her at work from fans account, and reported to HR.

I don't see what gives them the right to decide that their particular stupid version of religious "morals" should be allowed to dictate what someone does in their own time. If she is not doing anything illegal then F... them if they don't like it.
I'll bet some digging could find a whole bunch of "immoral" things all their "religious leaders" as well as a bunch of their "administrators" are doing.
It's that same old stupid B.S. about thinking there is something wrong or shameful about your body, and in particular women's bodies.
Someday somebody needs to sue such idiots into oblivion and use that as a precedent for all sides to tell employers very firmly that their B.S. rules stops once the employee steps off the premises.

Much like the current Supreme Court fight about schools trying to dictate what kids can do off campus and demanding the schools get to shred free speech for students in their own homes because of the same kind of B.S.
 
Last edited:
Do you know the difference between Baptists and Catholics?


Catholics will say hi to each other at the liquor store

A guy dies and goes to Heaven. St Pete escorts him into a long hallway with doors on either side. Pete opens the first door marked Pentecostal. They look in and see a very quiet group listening to the preacher talk in hushed tones. The guy says, "Pentecostals don't act that way on earth." St Pete replies, "I know, so they get to up here."

Next door is Methodists. Pete opens the door and people are clapping, singing and dancing in the aisles. The guy says, "Methodists don't act that way on earth." St Pete replies, "I know, so they get to up here."

The thid door says Baptists. They look in and everyone is gathered around a huge table eating and talking. The guys says, "That's all Baptists do on earth." St Pete says, "Shhh. They think they're the only ones here."
 
I don't see what gives them the right to decide that their particular stupid version of religious "morals" should be allowed to dictate what someone does in their own time. If she is not doing anything illegal then F... them if they don't like it.
I'll bet some digging could find a whole bunch of "immoral" things all their "religious leaders" as well as a bunch of their "administrators" are doing.
It's that same old stupid B.S. about thinking there is something wrong or shameful about your body, and in particular women's bodies.
Someday somebody needs to sue such idiots into oblivion and use that as a precedent for all sides to tell employers very firmly that their B.S. rules stops once the employee steps off the premises.

Much like the current Supreme Court fight about schools trying to dictate what kids can do off campus and demanding the schools get to shred free speech for students in their own homes because of the same kind of B.S.

Most likely signed a morals clause when hired. Kinda like having an HOA.
 
Most likely signed a morals clause when hired. Kinda like having an HOA.

The government should make it illegal for a business to force their "morals" on others for legal things they do in their own time.
People used to claim it was their right to refuse to employ people based on their race, ethnicity, religion or marital status and that was outlawed.
 
  • Love
Reactions: wh20crazy
The government should make it illegal for a business to force their "morals" on others for legal things they do in their own time.
People used to claim it was their right to refuse to employ people based on their race, ethnicity, religion or marital status and that was outlawed.

Absolutely! There are so many other areas the government should regulate, as well. :rolleyes:

They forced nothing on her. If she accepted the terms of employment, it's on her.
 
The government should do X or regulate Y, a person or company shouldn’t be able to do X or Y. The hard part is who decides what X and Y is.
 
The government should do X or regulate Y, a person or company shouldn’t be able to do X or Y. The hard part is who decides what X and Y is.

The government making sure Corporations can't use their financial power and their banks of lawyers to oppress and control others is actually a very good use of government.

Corporations NEED to be kept in check and pretty much it takes the Government to do so.

It is very different to regulating what a person can do.
(Despite all the folks who like to crow about corporations are people and have the same rights.... until said corporation does things that would get a person in prison for the rest of their lives, but gets away with a small settlement and no admission of wrongdoing...)