• New Contest Starting Now! This Target Haunts Me

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

10 shot ladder question

sleeplz

Private
Banned !
Minuteman
  • May 12, 2017
    1,489
    1,092
    I conducted a satterlee method load development using 6.5 creedmoor, magnetspeed v3, 140 berger hybrid match, hornady brass, and H4350. My question is, would 42.8 be my sweet spot?
     

    Attachments

    • 1573111912047.png
      1573111912047.png
      115.3 KB · Views: 199
    The Saterlee method is inappropriate for your combination. Scott was using heavy for caliber bullets (147's) and slow for caliber powders (4831 burn rate). He was packing them to 100+% load density at max pressures.

    You are at least a grain over pressure. See that spike going from 42.3 to 42.6? That is what's called a clue.
     
    Last edited by a moderator:
    I shot 41 through 42 grains of powder but was getting 2600. My brass looks fine at 42-43. For those saying I should stick between 41-42, is it because my sd's will be lower? I'll try graphing those results and seeing what I get.
     
    I shot 41 through 42 grains of powder but was getting 2600. My brass looks fine at 42-43. For those saying I should stick between 41-42, is it because my sd's will be lower? I'll try graphing those results and seeing what I get.
    Your graph shows 2775 at 42.3. Are you saying 0.3 grains showed an increase of 175 fps?
     
    You really need to stop trying to rely on a singular data point to establish velocity. You need to fire multiple rounds. I understand what you are trying to do, I just have not found that approach to be effective personally. I would start by loading 5 rounds each at 41.0, 41.5, and 42.0. Report back with the average velocity and SD for those charge weights. Fire them round robin.

    I have used the components you are using in 3 different 6.5 Creedmoor barrels. The information in your chart aligns roughly with what I would expect at those charge weights. 2600 between 41.0 and 42.0 does not. Something is not right.