Re: 22lr AR practice- CMMG conversion
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GreatGonzo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">My brother has a ceiner conversion for his ar, I have a dedicated upper (spikes) <span style="color: #000099">(also a good choice) </span>for mine. The advantages for the ceiner are cost, storage space, the ability to use the optics already on your AR. The advantages for the dedicated are barrel twist, no poi shift to be accounted for. The disadvantages of the ceiner is that you have to account for the shift in zero for 22, and you have to clean your gun more often as you get more lead in the barrel and carbon in the chamber. <span style="color: #000099">(not if your upper is a piston gun)</span> The disadvantage for the dedicated upper are cost (you not only need the upper but also optics). <span style="color: #000099">(not really, irons are best for general plinking and other close range shooting.)</span> The black dog magazines with the bolt hold open work with either kit.
That S&W is good stuff and the price is right. It certainly fills the gap in cost. </div></div> <span style="color: #000099">true.., very true, my problem with any conversion is the fact that any .22LR is undersized for the .223/5.56mm bore, the bullet skips across the first several inches of rifling then finally starts to spin, in a 1-9 twist the bullet barely has time to spin, then at about 50 yards you will encounter keyholing and/or groups in the 3 foot range.., at least that has been my experience. my Ciener kits are reserved only for my Colt SP-1s that have a 1-12 twist, i have consistently hit 12" steel gongs at 100 yds. with that set up</span>