.22LR Wind Drift - Std. Vel. vs. Hi-Velocity ammo

Slug Gun

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 19, 2003
6
0
Ohio
My understanding is that standard velocity .22LR ammo will "buck the wind" better then high velocity ammo out to extended yardages such as out to 200 yards. I'm trying to understand the mechanics of what is going on with this; does it have something to do with "transonic shock" or the percentage of velocity loss over time or what ?

Is there a thread on this forum or possibly an article on another website where I can read further into this. I'm looking for an explaination as to why and/or how this happens.

Thank you
 
I'm still playing with the math trying to figure it out.
I've got all sorts of theories, but no proof. I do have a list of links
put together that I keep rereading in my attempt to minimize my ignorance.

Super Subsonics | Rifles | Guns & Ammo

My personal opinion is that at supersonic speeds, the air molecules are compressed
into a skin, or sail, around and in front of the supersonic round.
That increases the apparent cross sectional area of the bullet. That larger area
is more affected by the crosswinds than the slower ammo. The mass of a 40 grain
round nose remains the same from the moment it leaves the muzzle until it impacts.
The velocity changes from muzzle to impact due to atmosperic friction, with the hi-v ammo
slowing at a faster rate. Both rounds have the same shape, so the only thing left
that explains the difference, is the sail/skin created by supersonic velocity.
That's my theory, seems to fit my math, but I'm no physicist...

My other premise has to do with the number of molecular impacts that occur
in the time it takes to get from the muzzle to the target. At subsonic speeds
the space between air molecules and the speed that they move at, means the subsonic
ammo slides through the gaps. But the supersonic ammo impacts and deflects more
of the air molecules, thereby transferring the lateral energy of the molecules
to the bullet, causing increased drift. Like I said, just theories...;^)

Think of it as shooting in the rain. At slower speeds you hit fewer drops
so you get fewer impacts causing less deflection. At high speeds,
the number of impacts increase, thereby causing a larger deflection.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to debate what the charts say. However, I can tell you I've had better luck at 330 yards with HV than SV at that distance.

For 100 yards, yes the SV has been better (tighter group). Just my experience with my rifle.
 
From the book, “Understanding Ballistics” by Robert Rinker, page 246

.22 Caliber Problems:
An increase in velocity decreases wind deflection, right ? Normally.
An exception to that rule is a .22 long rifle bullet. The airflow at Mach 1.0 is the reason. Air resistance is increased in this velocity range and a lot of air turbulence and pressure changes occur.
The delay time is affected out of proportion. The effect is in the velocity range 1,000 to 1,350 f.p.s. but the .22 rim fire is almost the only cartridge in this range.
Wind deflection is not controlled by time of flight but by the loss of velocity during the time of flight. During the transition velocity range above the speed of sound, the drag increases disproportionately higher then the velocity increases. In other words, if the velocity is increased by a small amount, the drag increases by a large amount. This situation is unique to this velocity range. At all other velocities, an increase in velocity will bring about a decrease in wind deflection. Not in the upper transition range. This is the reason for the special .22 match ammunition that is loaded so it will not go fast enough to get into this velocity range. The higher velocity .22 ammo has a flatter trajectory but is deflected more by a cross wind.
Many people incorrectly believe that an increase in velocity has no benefit for cross-wind problems. This idea is due in part to when the 40 grain .22 long rifle bullet was introduced in the late 1920’s. It’s approximate 1,330 f.p.s. performed worse than the standard bullet at 1,150. No one in those days knew of the problems with velocities near the speed of sound