Im in the market for another suppressor and want one or the other. I own a QD-Titan and it has been good, except having to send it back around every 500 rounds to have the locking mechanism replaced. Which would you get and why? Thanks
Suppressors 338 Ultra or Ultra SR
- Thread starter Greensnake
- Start date
The standard ultra should work for 99% of people like us. As I understand it, zak stated that asr had requested a secondary lock that would guard against inadvertent loosing in extreme conditions that 99% of us would probably never encounter.
Do you use other tbac suppressors? If you do, having the ultra would be nice to be able to throw on different rifles. If it’s soley going to be used on the 338 the the asr would be my suggestion.
The regular 338 Ultra would require the CB2BA adapter to fit on our CB brake cans (ie, the .30 cal and smaller Ultras). We will eventually have more cans that use the SR mount, but I do not have an ETA that I can say, yet.
Will the SR cans have to be sent in over time to have the locking mechanism repaired/replaced as a wear item like the AAC QD-Titan?
I went with the pedestrian 338 Ultra, should be able to provide some feedback around June 2020 .
The SR sounds amazing on everything I shot it on, from 6.5 creed to .338LM. TBAC engineered the secondary retention for long life. It may look like an AAC 51T but that’s where the similarities end.
Might it be possible to one day send in our serialized Ultra cans to get the mounting interface replaced for the SR mounting system? For a fee of course?
Just ordered the 338 ultra. For my needs I don’t need an extra cam attachment. My suppressors don’t come loose any how. They only get tighter.
Similar threads
