Accuracy International Picture Thread

  • Like
Reactions: stanley_white


Uploaded most of the Stage Videos into a playlist from my last match prior to the IPRF '24 World Champs at Cameo next month.

Can't decide whether to record the stages at the World Champs or leave the TriggerCam at home and give myself one less thing to think about before a stage.
 
Last edited:
IMG_0577.png
 


Uploaded most of the Stage Videos into a playlist from my last match prior to the IPRF '24 World Champs at Cameo next month.

Can't decide whether to record the stages at the World Champs or leave the TriggerCam at home and give myself one less thing to think about before a stage.


Very well done Sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JayjayUK
Besides the barrel/profile, what are the other differences between a Pre 2014 AT308 and a Post 2014 AT308?
Think the AT only goes back to 2014. The 14 AT has a large firing pin. 2015 they went to small firing pins

AX would apply here and introduced the current AX stock vs the AT stock and the quickloc barrel feature

Previous to the AT only the AW was available in that configuration or the AE. Which didn’t have the quickloc
 
Think the AT only goes back to 2014. The 14 AT has a large firing pin. 2015 they went to small firing pins

AX would apply here and introduced the current AX stock vs the AT stock and the quickloc barrel feature

Previous to the AT only the AW was available in that configuration or the AE. Which didn’t have the quickloc
I have a 13 dated AT. The bolt looks very similar to the AW which lacks the long flutings found on later ATs.
3b29794c50e1d4d06871ed58716d642c.jpeg
 
I have a 13 dated AT. The bolt looks very similar to the AW which lacks the long flutings found on later ATs. View attachment 8473866
So, is that the easiest way to know "which" you have?

I have both a 14 and 18. I should look at the bolts of both. But both have the full length fluting. I honestly wonder if it's anything "2014 and up" and not "post 2014" i.e. 2015 and up.

The barrel profile on the 2014 vs 2018 is certainly different, but both are 1:12.
 
I have a 13 dated AT. The bolt looks very similar to the AW which lacks the long flutings found on later ATs. View attachment 8473866
Right mine does as well. The fluting came in 15 with the SFP I think. I’d guess the 13 would be the first year production on the AT then. Same as the AXMC. I think technically with the AXMC as well it’s a 2014 production. But there’s some dated 2013. Mine was a 2013 model
 
So, is that the easiest way to know "which" you have?

I have both a 14 and 18. I should look at the bolts of both. But both have the full length fluting. I honestly wonder if it's anything "2014 and up" and not "post 2014" i.e. 2015 and up.

The barrel profile on the 2014 vs 2018 is certainly different, but both are 1:12.
My 2014 AT is a LFP model. My barrel is also thinner but I think the thicker profile or at least current profile came in 2018.

My 308 is a LW 1:12 barrel

I just bought another 2014 AT here and that is LFP as well. Same bolt design. This is a 2014 AT. The 2014 bolt is on the far left

If your trying to see what firing pin you have you can pull the pin and measure it

Something like .078” vs .063” large vs small
IMG_6642.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Damn, I hate PRS.

So much gear designed specifically for playing a game.
Meh. You learn to build steady positions quickly on the clock. And get your gear and technique sorted.

Some of the hardware / software drifts over and benefits “real world “ shooters

F43AFB22-944C-45E9-8B8B-6C483CD57D69.jpeg


2” bars at 400 for the “targets are big “ crowd



9B2B69D7-9421-4196-9DA6-1BFB124DE378.jpeg


Most rifles are pretty reasonable as far as versatility
 
I bought an AI AT in 308 in March once AI announced they were discontinuing civilian sales of this model.

I bought 10 AW magazines with it as well.

Tonight I finally got it out and all ten magazines, when filled with ten dummy rounds, cycled flawlessly the first time — no tuning required.

I am excited to finally get this thing to the range in the coming weeks.

Turn-key system? Damn right.

-Stan
DAMN RIGHT!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: stanley_white
Meh. You learn to build steady positions quickly on the clock. And get your gear and technique sorted.

Some of the hardware / software drifts over and benefits “real world “ shooters

View attachment 8473890

2” bars at 400 for the “targets are big “ crowd



View attachment 8473891

Most rifles are pretty reasonable as far as versatility
What reticle is that?
 
Meh. You learn to build steady positions quickly on the clock. And get your gear and technique sorted.

Some of the hardware / software drifts over and benefits “real world “ shooters

View attachment 8473890

2” bars at 400 for the “targets are big “ crowd



View attachment 8473891

Most rifles are pretty reasonable as far as versatility
I don’t shoot prs. Probably never will. But I can honestly say it has probably been the biggest influence on modern shooting equipment for everyone.

It brings the modern chassis’s we have, the huge amount of optics, calibers and barrels available. Also the actions. Basically everything most of us use has come about from prs guys who do positional shooting and swap lots of barrels.

A lot of its style transfers easily to hunting and other shooting disciplines

It also opened up an entire market of .22 trainers and second hand equipment at great prices for people to try

It brought a whole new life to centerfire and rimfire is benefiting now as well

I for one appreciate the gamer guys
 
I don’t shoot prs. Probably never will. But I can honestly say it has probably been the biggest influence on modern shooting equipment for everyone.

It brings the modern chassis’s we have, the huge amount of optics, calibers and barrels available. Also the actions. Basically everything most of us use has come about from prs guys who do positional shooting and swap lots of barrels.

A lot of its style transfers easily to hunting and other shooting disciplines

It also opened up an entire market of .22 trainers and second hand equipment at great prices for people to try

It brought a whole new life to centerfire and rimfire is benefiting now as well

I for one appreciate the gamer guys


Ditto...


ditto-blazing.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: hafejd30
It appears that buying a spare breech ring is basically impossible as neither MHSA or Sporting Services will respond to my emails to either confirm or deny their availability/cost.

Are there any other options that I'm unaware of?
 
Why do you need one? Do you know how to remove and install one?

I want one as a spare and AI states it's an easily replaceable part. It's just a ring that slides into the front of the action same as what GA Precision uses on their Tempest action.

I don't get why you think that having critical spare parts on hand for a $5K imported rifle (I have 2 AT's) to ensure you can keep it running for the next 30+ years is such a crazy idea? Importation of parts for these rifles could be stopped with the stroke of a pen at any time so it seems like a worthwhile investment to me.

ETA: If nothing else I may not know how to install it but I bet MHSA does so if I ever screw up a rifle and the part isn't available I can send the rifle and the part to MHSA and have them install it.
 
Last edited:
Manzella makes awesome barrels and has history with AI. Basically a factory barrel but more accurate.

View attachment 8466453

My 6cm barrel shoots lights out and much better shooters than me only use his barrels due to his consistency and attention to detail.
Ordered!

Thank you @BurtG!

-Stan
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
I don’t shoot prs. Probably never will. But I can honestly say it has probably been the biggest influence on modern shooting equipment for everyone.

It brings the modern chassis’s we have, the huge amount of optics, calibers and barrels available. Also the actions. Basically everything most of us use has come about from prs guys who do positional shooting and swap lots of barrels.

A lot of its style transfers easily to hunting and other shooting disciplines

It also opened up an entire market of .22 trainers and second hand equipment at great prices for people to try

It brought a whole new life to centerfire and rimfire is benefiting now as well

I for one appreciate the gamer guys
I was thinking similar but then i shot 3 matches in a row; Saturday my 4th. My learning curve is on a sharp incline; i learn a lot, and very quick. Not to mention, i met a lot of great people. However, am i going to shoot prs a lot? Nah. My Son plans on competing though. He is young.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
I want one as a spare and AI states it's an easily replaceable part. It's just a ring that slides into the front of the action same as what GA Precision uses on their Tempest action.

I don't get why you think that having critical spare parts on hand for a $5K imported rifle (I have 2 AT's) to ensure you can keep it running for the next 30+ years is such a crazy idea? Importation of parts for these rifles could be stopped with the stroke of a pen at any time so it seems like a worthwhile investment to me.

ETA: If nothing else I may not know how to install it but I bet MHSA does so if I ever screw up a rifle and the part isn't available I can send the rifle and the part to MHSA and have them install it.
I don't know of anyone ever replacing one of those rings. Jacob at RO maybe? I would still like to replace the firing springs on my AIs soon. I don't even know if they sell those are not.
 
I don't know of anyone ever replacing one of those rings. Jacob at RO maybe? I would still like to replace the firing springs on my AIs soon. I don't even know if they sell those are not.

It seems like it's probably not going to be possible to get a spare and I'm guessing you'll have to send in your rifles to have the springs changed as well (if they'll even do it). I'm still attempting to track some down though. I have tons of critical spare parts for my AR's and want to do the same for my AI's regardless of "the need".

AI is like Apple it appears in regards to selling replacement parts.
 
For the folks that do a lot of positional shooting with their AXMC or AXSR, what height are you running your glass at? I'm annoyingly tall and also shoot with my glasses on due to a heavy astigmatism correction. As a result I find myself bobbing down with a craned neck for a clear sight picture more than I'd like to admit when running the AI.

I'm currently running a H38MM Spuhr mount (1.5") with a 56MM objective, which already seems a tad high on paper, but when I do the "get comfortable behind the gun with closed eyes and then open them" test, it feels like I should maybe run a H44MM (1.723") to not have the upper edge of glasses obstructing the sight picture and otherwise be in a comfortable head-up position.

Any other tall bespectacled folks deal with the same?
The daily glasses lenses I wear aren’t tall enough for scope use. As such, I have a pair with taller lenses that I wear when I shoot.

If you get into the prone without glasses, does your eye line up behind the scope?

To me, while this might be a scope height problem, it could also be a glasses design problem.

-Stan
 
  • Like
Reactions: CollarChoke
I’m only a bit taller than average, but I still feel your pain. Before my cataract surgeries, with my roughly -11/-10 rx glasses, I needed absurdly tall rings on my AX so my neck didn’t scream at me.

Like, the tallest Spuhr makes, 1.89”. Not the greatest look lol

Now, sans glasses, 1.5” is fine.

If I was still shooting with rx glasses, I’d have a pair made that sit like those shotgunning shades.

As in jacked way the eff up high to counteract that “looking through the extreme upper left corner of the specs which are the shittiest place to look through” problem you I had/have. (I’m right-handed btw.)

1723062809205.jpeg

Sorta like Hunter S. Thompson’s. Only maybe higher? Hard to tell.

1723062684682.jpeg
That’s not me. Don’t like those shades, but they’re nice and high. You get the idea.

Might not negate the need for a super tall mount. But it’ll help with discomfort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CollarChoke
For the folks that do a lot of positional shooting with their AXMC or AXSR, what height are you running your glass at? I'm annoyingly tall and also shoot with my glasses on due to a heavy astigmatism correction. As a result I find myself bobbing down with a craned neck for a clear sight picture more than I'd like to admit when running the AI.

I'm currently running a H38MM Spuhr mount (1.5") with a 56MM objective, which already seems a tad high on paper, but when I do the "get comfortable behind the gun with closed eyes and then open them" test, it feels like I should maybe run a H44MM (1.723") to not have the upper edge of glasses obstructing the sight picture and otherwise be in a comfortable head-up position.

Any other tall bespectacled folks deal with the same?
Do you have the cheek piece lowered as far as it will go?

With the adjustable butt pad you could maybe lower the cheekpiece and adjust the butt pad accordingly to gain some additional room for your head position.

I also adjust my cheek piece laterally to the side to allow my head to come further over and not feel like I need to "roll" my head.
 
Yeah in prone without glasses I'm fine, it's the top rim of the glasses that drops right into my FOV that I'm having to work around with a more upright head posture, but then that puts me just too high for a comfortable sight picture. I guess a set of new glasses is cheaper than a new Spuhr mount haha
You can also try raising your bipod height and rear bag. It’ll keep your head up a little more and neck less crunched up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CollarChoke
Yeah I have it as low as it will go and even removed the Hoptic pad I had on there. Have dropped the butt pad to not interfere as well, if I had another quarter inch of downward adjustment I'd be golden but alas the long action bolt has to clear the cheek riser. I think what folks are saying is spot on ... I either need to get some taller glasses, or bump the scope rings up a size.
Try taking the cheek piece off entirely.