I wish they’d uphold some 2A shit, you know something that is actually in the BOR!
- Thread starter SilentStalkr
- Start date
US Supreme Court upholds access to abortion pill mifepristone
The ruling preserves broad access to mifepristone, upholding the US Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the pill.
Of course, it’s for the children……eh…..I mean the killing of them. Nothing to see here, time to get back to climate change, saving the planet, and abolishing hunting because animals have rights, unborn children don’t.
Where’s the sarcastic font? These people are beyond mentally ill.
Where’s the sarcastic font? These people are beyond mentally ill.
You really want a single judge determining which medications are allowable. By himself. With no medical training. And with a long history of radical activism.
Yeah, yeah, judicial activism is cool as long as it’s for your cause and doctors are all commie scum anyway BUT,
SCOTUS got this one exactly right.
Yeah, yeah, judicial activism is cool as long as it’s for your cause and doctors are all commie scum anyway BUT,
SCOTUS got this one exactly right.
No. What I want is for them to hear cases and uphold actual rights in the BOR, you know things they took an oath to uphold.
Last edited:
Ok. Me too. But that’s not their exclusive job…adjudicating the bill of rights…despite the fact that it probably should be.
I am absolutely opposed to abortion fundamentally, but they aren't killing conservatives, so....... meh.
As far as whether or not a panel of judges should be weighing in on something like this? The company that manufactured this product has rights too. You have the right to be a scumbag, and we should let people destroy themselves if they want to. The Supreme Court has no responsibility to protect people from themselves. All drugs should be legal..
As far as whether or not a panel of judges should be weighing in on something like this? The company that manufactured this product has rights too. You have the right to be a scumbag, and we should let people destroy themselves if they want to. The Supreme Court has no responsibility to protect people from themselves. All drugs should be legal..
I actually think that as long as pot smoking dipshits continue their “it’s legal in my state” bullshit, baby killers might as well just ignore any restrictions on their baby killing meds. It’s the same thing. Fuck the man, so to speak.
But...but...the 'MAN' is basically an asshole, blithering idiot, and only gets it right by accident.
My dad was a firm believer in opposing any decision that takes any freedom from citizens. It's the slow erosion that kills, the death by a thousand cuts.
He would say "once they take something from you, you'll never get it back, so don't give them a fucking inch".
He would say "once they take something from you, you'll never get it back, so don't give them a fucking inch".
The article I read explained that SCOTUS was not making a decision on an injunction but letting the case go through the court system. So they could be trying to not influence the lower court. They have already ruled that it is a state by state issue. Which they may do again if they have to rule on the abortion pill case.
So my main point in making this thread isn’t about the ruling or lack there of, it’s simply my frustration with which the blistering speed at which this got to the courts number one and number two the fact that they seem to avoid taking on cases that actually have to do with rights, like the 2A, that they should be protecting. That’s it. I could really care less if someone has access to an abortion pill or not even tho I’m opposed to abortion under most circumstances. Regardless, any sort of abortion isn’t a right, period, at least not yet. If they want to make it so then fine, by all means go through the process and get it done. Otherwise, I think they need to focus on things that are the fundamental fabric of the country.
Oh and as far as companies having rights, tell that to any number of them that had to close up shop during Covid, or how about ones that were forced out of biz or made to serve gay people that went against their religious beliefs and on and on and on. Where are those peoples rights? That’s sort of my point as well. We seem to have a cherry picking system and it clearly ain’t working. Know why it’s not working? Because they selectively apply stuff and don’t stick to the fundamentals that are written out in black and white.
Clearly the best answer is both!
You aren't wrong. I really wonder why we all go through all this mental masturbation discussing politics like it isn't a total sham. It's just sad.
You think it's sad now? Wait for Clarence Thomas to leave - the whole SCOTUS will implode.
How long until the part where the people in the cities have to eat each other to survive? Can't be far off now.
clothes hangar baby survivor for sure.They'll be hitting up the shelters for small animals ...
Petsmart will be out of gold fish pretty fast, and then.... they will turn on each other. And then perhaps the Kraken.
