• Frank's Lesson's Contest

    We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!

    Create a channel Learn more
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

Hunting & Fishing "Blood thirsty" sisters

Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

I am not gonna lie I certainly am jealous of where and what they get to hunt, I have yet to hunt out side of texas or shoot something other a hog a javilina or a whitetail deer
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

Thats the right way ot raise a family right there...spending "real" time with the kids instead of sending them off alone to play XBOX just to get them out of their hair because they have no clue how to relate to them otherwise. Kudos to mom and dad!! Thats exactly how I'm raising my boys and damn proud of it.

The reporter that wrote that piece is a total asshat...
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

I am also jealous of what they are doing. I think writer is anti-hunting due to the way this is written. If this was done by an NRA publication it would be better worded. Otherwise I am happy to see another younger generation getting involved.
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

awesome! That these girls are hunting as opposed to other things kids get into. I don't think the author of that article was for hunting very much. My oldest stepsons father is strongly against him doin anything outdoors and is perfectly content with him playing wii all day. His mother wants him to get out and get dirty. When we first met he was petrified of firearms. It took me a month to get him just to shoot a .22 but he has moved up to my 22-250 and has taken a few shots with a 20ga and is psyched about duck season approaching. I applaud anyone for getting their kids involved in hunting or any outdoor activity. Anti hunters suck!
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

"Bloodlust: Meet the 'twisted' teenage sisters who love shooting rare wild animals"

Nothing rare about any of the animals the girls shot, BS title for the article

the writer even quoted wrong "killed and gutted with my RARE hand" dumb ass its bare hands.
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SingleShot85</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"Nothing rare about any of the animals the girls shot, BS title for the article

</div></div>

Took the words right out of my mouth.
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

I wish I could afford to take my kids all over the world hunting rare animals and killing and gutting them with their hare hands. I hope my daughter is as enthusiastic about the outdoors as these young ladies are when she gets to that age.
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: SingleShot85</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"Bloodlust: Meet the 'twisted' teenage sisters who love shooting rare wild animals"

Nothing rare about any of the animals the girls shot, BS title for the article

the writer even quoted wrong "killed and gutted with my RARE hand" dumb ass its bare hands.</div></div>
that's exactly what I thought when I saw the title. Makes it seem if you hunt you are "blood thirsty" as if hunting animals is equal to hunting humans.
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

Hi all,

A few thoughts on this article from the UK perspective...

The "News Of The World" is a gutter level Sunday tabloid newspaper which provides a weekly dose of soft porn, celeb. gossip and sports results... serious journalism it isn't! Read by the unintelligent, uneducated, uninspired and unemployed.

EDIT: I missread the url. THE Daily Mail is a different paper to the News Of The World - not quite as trashy, but bad enough. The rest of the post I stick by.

I rather think this article is a complete fabrication because...

1 Notice the 'family' photo, these people are posing a staged shot (probably lifted from a catalogue) and, quite plainly, are unfamilar with firearms.

2 Notice the nice scrubbed ivory white, unblemished skin - hasn't been out in the African sun on any kind of taxing hunt,

3 Clothes are either unsuitable or immaculately clean and pressed.

4 Complete lack of entry or exit wounds on any of the (I suspect tranquilised) animals... Would a Gemsbuck (sic) really show no wounds considering the calibre reccomended to hunt one.

5 Etc. etc. etc.

A load of fabricated rubbish aimed at uninformed, low IQ readership with the intention of causing resentment. Rich, priveliged people murder animals for fun... you can't do it, so it must be sick and cruel etc. Inciting class hatred to try and attack private gun ownership after a couple of high profile killing sprees in the recent past.

Regards,
Steve

PS wish my first post on SH wasn't so negative

 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

Dunno about you TJ, but I'm sick-to-death of this gutter level media shit.

How much is it to emigrate to US or NZ... I wish (cue big sigh)

Steve
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

Yeah its pathetic. I've been drooling at some of these pat rogers carbine course pics today and feel we've def got the short end of the straw over here !! I'm trying to persuade the wife to spend a month in the US so i can attend a course or two. Once that's done i just have to persuade the other boss.
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: stoatstail</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hi all,

A few thoughts on this article from the UK perspective...

The "News Of The World" is a gutter level Sunday tabloid newspaper which provides a weekly dose of soft porn, celeb. gossip and sports results... serious journalism it isn't! Read by the unintelligent, uneducated, uninspired and unemployed.

EDIT: I missread the url. THE Daily Mail is a different paper to the News Of The World - not quite as trashy, but bad enough. The rest of the post I stick by.

I rather think this article is a complete fabrication because...

1 Notice the 'family' photo, these people are posing a staged shot (probably lifted from a catalogue) and, quite plainly, are unfamilar with firearms.

2 Notice the nice scrubbed ivory white, unblemished skin - hasn't been out in the African sun on any kind of taxing hunt,

3 Clothes are either unsuitable or immaculately clean and pressed.

4 Complete lack of entry or exit wounds on any of the (I suspect tranquilised) animals... Would a Gemsbuck (sic) really show no wounds considering the calibre reccomended to hunt one.

5 Etc. etc. etc.

A load of fabricated rubbish aimed at uninformed, low IQ readership with the intention of causing resentment. Rich, priveliged people murder animals for fun... you can't do it, so it must be sick and cruel etc. Inciting class hatred to try and attack private gun ownership after a couple of high profile killing sprees in the recent past.

Regards,
Steve

PS wish my first post on SH wasn't so negative

</div></div>

You might be right about the caliber of the papers mentioned, but you are indeed wrong about the people depicted and the story told, albeit unnecessarily one-sided. More of an editorial than true journalism.

As for their clothes, etc. Dude... they can afford to do these hunts, they can afford to pay extra for not roughing it. It's not like they're in the middle of some Kipling poem... or reenacting Heart of Darkness. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these hunts were in high fence areas or on private land where the animals are easy to bag.

Not all animals will have an exit wound. Sometimes, people pose with the animal with the wound facing away from the camera if there is only an entrance wound. The Gemsbuck is about the size of a cow elk. You don't need a .800 HFS Magnum to take one down. Anything .243 or larger should do the trick with proper shot placement. I have a feeling with the game these girls hunt, they can put bullet on vitals from a distance that would shame many members here. I see nothing particularly unsuitable in their manner of dress for the way they probably hunt and in the manner they do it. Large amounts of cash, minimal chance of not seeing and getting a shot at the animal. Likely from a vehicle or while being driven around by one. They never claimed to be out there like Jeremiah Johnson.

Anyway, here's her website: http://www.adventurewoman.com/sara.php

Another article: http://womensoutdoornews.com/2010/06/my-...slam-for-sheep/
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

"Good looking women hunting, hiking, and shooting! Why is anyone complaining?"

Most certainly not complaining about them doing this. Assuming this is an accurate report - which I still doubt, knowing the UK press as I do - then I wish I was in the same financial position... just turned into the green eyed monster for a second.

I guess my real gripe is the obvious anti-hunting propaganda aimed at a largely non gun owning (and paranoid) British public.

I can't really express the situation which exsists here currently, but private gun ownership is under fire and this sort of article doesn't help.

Regards,
Steve
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: stoatstail</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"Good looking women hunting, hiking, and shooting! Why is anyone complaining?"

Most certainly not complaining about them doing this. Assuming this is an accurate report - which I still doubt, knowing the UK press as I do - then I wish I was in the same financial position... just turned into the green eyed monster for a second.

I guess my real gripe is the obvious anti-hunting propaganda aimed at a largely non gun owning (and paranoid) British public.

I can't really express the situation which exsists here currently, but private gun ownership is under fire and this sort of article doesn't help.

Regards,
Steve
</div></div>

I realize that reading the links I provided might ruin your self built image of the story's veracity. While the slant is obviously anti-hunting, the information and pictures are factual.

None of those animals are rare in their respective habitats. I don't know about African laws, but in the US- you're not legally shooting anything remotely rare on a guided and licensed hunt. Even if the state only issues 2 tags, they intend for those two tags to be filled. The article doesn't hurt any cause, it just further enforces British ignorance to the American system of conservation. Since it is written by a Brit, I'd say that is just preaching to the choir more than detrimental.
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

I agree with Cavscout 110%...

Stoatstail,
I don't really disagree with your view of the newpaper source, nor that the article is slanted towards anti-hunting heavily.

However the pictures while 100% factual, are likely mis-labeled... For instance, the picture of the family of four posing behind their rifles reads;

"Family fun day out: Mother Lori, Sara, Katey and father Rod Brandenburg taking aim on a hunt in the hills of Longmont, Colorado"

Do you really think they were on a hunt, or that they were posing for a picture likely lifted from another 'biography' type article?

The picture of the girl "sara" with her Wyoming 2007 antelope you can clearly see a bullet wound behind the shoulder high on the back. The picture of the two girls next to that one posing with their rifles is another typical photograph to illustrate their hunting passion, not on a "Hunt on july 21, 2010" as the picture is labeled. Notice the hair and makeup? Compare that to the picture of the girls with their kills where they are plainly not as 'dolled up'.

Picture of the girl with the zebra, notice the rock that the zebras head is on? See the blood? Further pictures of the grizzley reveals blood on the fur, the blood on the horns of the whitetail buck, the cutoff skull of the sheep in the pack...etc need I go on? I find your claim of the animals likely being "tranquilized" absolutely rediculous.

Mike
 
Re: "Blood thirsty" sisters

This article was obviously written by an anti-hunter. These girls are awesome. As for the blood on the 13 yr. olds face, I'll bet that was her 1st kill. I've got pics of my kids with the same look, blood and all after their 1st kill. It is a tradition, afterall, in "our neck of the woods". If THAT offends you, then don't look.