• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Maggie’s California haters...rejoyce

Maggot

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood"
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
  • Jul 27, 2007
    26,850
    32,003
    Virginia
    A group of more than 100 scientists and experts say in a new report that California faces the risk of a massive "superstorm" that could flood a quarter of the state's homes and cause $300 billion to $400 billion in damage. Researchers point out that the potential scale of destruction in this storm scenario is four or five times the amount of damage that could be wrought by a major earthquake.

    It sounds like the plot of an apocalyptic action movie, but scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey warned federal and state emergency officials that California's geological history shows such "superstorms" have happened in the past, and should be added to the long list of natural disasters to worry about in the Golden State.


    [Photos: Dramatic funnel clouds caught on camera]


    The threat of a cataclysmic California storm has been dormant for the past 150 years. Geological Survey director Marcia K. McNutt told the New York Times that a 300-mile stretch of the Central Valley was inundated from 1861-62. The floods were so bad that the state capital had to be moved to San Francisco, and Governor Leland Stanford had to take a rowboat to his own inauguration, the report notes. Even larger storms happened in past centuries, over the dates 212, 440, 603, 1029, 1418, and 1605, according to geological evidence.


    The risk is gathering momentum now, scientists say, due to rising temperatures in the atmosphere, which has generally made weather patterns more volatile.

    [Video: Unusual footage of fire tornado]

    The scientists built a model that showed a storm could last for more than 40 days and dump 10 feet of water on the state. The storm would be goaded on by an "atmospheric river" that would move water "at the same rate as 50 Mississippis discharging water into the Gulf of Mexico," according to the AP. Winds could reach 125 miles per hour, and landslides could compound the damage, the report notes.

    Such a superstorm is hypothetical but not improbable, climate researchers warn. "We think this event happens once every 100 or 200 years or so, which puts it in the same category as our big San Andreas earthquakes," Geological Survey scientist Lucy Jones said in a press release.[

    Related: Little boy becomes hero of Australian flood]

    Federal and state emergency management officials convened a conference about emergency preparations for possible superstorms last week. You can read the whole report here.
     
    Re: California haters...rejoyce

    Kevin Martin, a Meteorologist for TheWeatherSpace.com, said on his site that the superstorm reports are, as well-behaved kids used to say in the '70s, "bullcrap."

    The titles are premature and irresponsible,'' said Martin. "Any outlet that deems scaring the living daylights out of the public with false titles should lose credibility. The fact is, it is a scenario, not an actual storm as we speak."

    Martin blamed a well-known Internet outlet for launching the story without any real basis for it, suggesting that the site's objective was to create hysteria to generate the maximum amount of hits.

    Well, it worked. The story generated an amount of comments approaching 13,000 at last check, with no signs of slowing down.

    Martin also pointed out California is in a dry spell and that rain isn't expected in the state until the end of this month. If this holds true, this precipitation will be the standard wimpy San Diego mist, not the wild rain that stopped by a few weeks back. And while those storms caught the sun-worshipping locals off guard, it wasn't as if the whole county shut down because of it.

    For another view, Lucy Jones, chief scientist for the United States Geological Survey's multi-hazards initiative, told the New York Times, "Floods are as much a part of our lives in California as earthquakes are. We are probably not going to be able to handle the biggest ones.''

    Another theory trotted out there is since January 17th is the 17th anniversary of the Northridge earthquake, some bad stuff has to be in the offing. Plus, Marcia K. McNutt, director of the survey, pointed out on the LAobserved.com site that over a few weeks in the winter of 1861-62, enough rain fell to overwhelm a stretch of the Central Valley, 300 miles long and 20 miles wide, from north of Sacramento to south of Bakersfield.

    This storm lasted 45 days, creating lakes and causing all sorts of assorted mayhem.

    Jones told a Web site that, "We think this is an event that could happen every 100 or 200 years or so, which puts us in the same category as our big San Andreas earthquakes.''

    Then again, climate researchers say such a superstorm could happen--but isn't probable.
     
    Re: California haters...rejoyce

    Funny that the one state that has taken the "Global Warming" crap the furthest is now in jeopardy of having "super duper storms" wash it from the face of the earth. Or it could all be a load of crap.
    confused.gif
     
    Re: California haters...rejoyce

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: desertrat1979</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That state needs to be douched out anyway. </div></div>
    +1 billion!