Died Suddenly Documentary World Is Live On Rumble


Totally agree, but would be remiss if I didn't say this is a little ironical coming from a guy who changed his name 5 times, gay love of Peter Thiel, got seed money from Pete (and probably Pete's seed), wears eye-liner and drag, won his first election a couple years ago, was a 'Never-Trumper' barely 15 minutes ago, and is now positioned to be the top of the GOP ticket in two short years (actually, he'll be President in less than a year, but I digress).

Amazing trajectory.

You can't make this "Everyone knows you're full of" shit up.
 
if pharma makes affordable, effective and safe products that are a benefit to americans, why do they need to be involved in funding politicians?

8tWlHzgQhJ17.jpeg
 
lol

...the same reason electronic manufacturing/tech companies and every other industry (even HVAC) does. Seriously? Who comes up with this propoganda and who are the consumers thereof?

Nearly $4B by tech alone...

View attachment 8760593
tech invests because congress can make regulatory policy decisions that affect their profits.
if pharma is legit, the efficacy and safety of their products should preclude the need to pay off politicians.
instead, they seem to have a need to pay off congress and the regulatory bodies that make health policies.
in any case, election finance is definitely a dirty business.

i wonder how much "aid" to israel makes its way back through to aipac to fund the politicians that approve the "aid" in the first place.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
tech invests because congress can make regulatory policy decisions that affect their profits.
if pharma is legit, the efficacy and safety of their products should preclude the need to pay off politicians.
instead, they seem to have a need to pay off congress and the regulatory bodies that make health policies.
in any case, election finance is definitely a dirty business.
Very dirty indeed, this was clearly proven again today in RFK’s “hearing”.
 
tech invests because congress can make regulatory policy decisions that affect their profits.
if pharma is legit, the efficacy and safety of their products should preclude the need to pay off politicians.
instead, they seem to have a need to pay off congress and the regulatory bodies that make health policies.
in any case, election finance is definitely a dirty business.

i wonder how much "aid" to israel makes its way back through to aipac to fund the politicians that approve the "aid" in the first place.
"If farmers grow such good crops, why do they need to be involved in funding politicians" and throwing nearly half a bill lobbying for the Farm Bill? In the voice of that dude who used to shower with his daughter, come on, man.

Everyone does it for the very reason you stated when rhetorically asking why...just calling balls and strikes. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46