Bushmaster11,
I can pretty well assure you that the passage in the Hornady manual touting N/S was written decades ago, and simply hasn't been reviewed or updated. No, go with the F/F sizing and save yourself some troubles. You will have a hard time finding any competitive shooters still using the N/S approach, and I'm not aware of any of the other bullet makers using N/S in their own in-house accuracy testing for their own bullets. Rather doubt that Hornady does anymore, either.
The F/L bushing dies are exactly what the name implies; dies that F/L resize the enitire case body, but have the additional benefit of being cut to take a bushing to allow you to properly size that area of the case. Think of it this way, the standard die (non-bushing, neck OR full length) has to be able to size ANY case you run through it. And there's the problem. Cases vary considerably from one case manufacturer to another in terms of neck wall thicknesses. The only way they can accomodate them all (yes, the "one size fits all" approach) is to drastically oversize the O.D. of the case neck, to assure that even the thinest case necks will be adequately sized. This means that the thicker cases are being worked far more than they need to be, which will result in work hardened brass, neck cracking and very short case life. Part of this is due to the fact that the only way that they can control the degree of neck tension with these dies, is by using an expander ball to fix the I.D. of the resized cases. Expander balls can add all sorts of evil problems to the resized cases, including excessive work hardening, pulling (drawing,actually) the necks off center, and inducing some really ugly run-out problems in the finished ammo. The addition of a bushing eliminates these problems, by allowing the handloader to select the appropriate size bushing for his particular brass. The sizing being done is reduced, resulting in less work hardening by not overworking the brass. You can also gain more control over your neck tension by selecting a smaller bushing (they're available in .001" increments) and eliminating the expander ball altogether. No need for it, depending on the uniformity of your brass, and your wilingness not to try using "mixed" lost of brass in the same reloading session. Bad form, anyway.
For what it's worth, I DO use an expander for much of my reloading, as I want to ensure that the neck perfectly uniform throughout some large lots of brass. However, by selecting the appropriate bushing size, I can get it to where you can barely fell the slightest kiss when the expander passes though the neck. I use Redding's carbide expander, but the eliptical design is also good. Either way, it's the selection of the proper sized bushing that's really making the difference here.
Bottom line, again, is that there's no reason to mess with N/S dies, so long as you're doing the F/L approach properly. And I promise you, if you stick with neck sizing and shoot enough, you'll run into some major problems down the road. Murphy always seems to make sure that they truly do appear at the worst possible moment. F/L size, and avoid them altogether.