Rifle Scopes General scope question

phillip61

Sergeant
Banned !
Full Member
Minuteman
Jun 14, 2012
641
39
63
texas
not necessarily a brand, but what magnification and reticle placement (FFP or SFP) do you think is the best all around for known and unknown distance shooting out to 1000yds?
 
Opinion is based on the quality of the two vortex optics i own. Im assuming the gen to will be equal or better based on reviews ive read on here so far. Weight wasnt mentioned as a concern by the op. It is a heavy pig, but whats another pound or so on whats prob going to be a heavier rifle anyway. And if the rifle is built light, theres room for a little extra weight. Also, 4-27 is a wide magnifaction range that should cover almost all ranges. I think the price is even cheaper than March scopes which are the only ones im aware off hat have such a wide range. Just my .02
 
Opinion is based on the quality of the two vortex optics i own. Im assuming the gen to will be equal or better based on reviews ive read on here so far. Weight wasnt mentioned as a concern by the op. It is a heavy pig, but whats another pound or so on whats prob going to be a heavier rifle anyway. And if the rifle is built light, theres room for a little extra weight. Also, 4-27 is a wide magnifaction range that should cover almost all ranges. I think the price is even cheaper than March scopes which are the only ones im aware off hat have such a wide range. Just my .02

I'd rather allocate extra weight to the barrel than the scope. New(er) designs are going lighter and smaller, example the 3-18 Mk 6, and the unreleased Vortex scopes are the exact opposite. Leupold's Mark 6 is a tick under 12" and about 23 oz's. So not only is it 2.5" shorter, its about 1lb lighter.

Either way, I would't recommend something without actually using it first.