I've been trying to work up some loads using 175 SMKs for use at 5-600 yds in my 20" SPS-T. Just for shits and giggles - I ran a side by side test over two days using the 175 SMKs and against 168 AMAXs that I just happened to pick up on a whim at a local store.
Anyway, the results somewhat surprised me. At 100yds, the 168 AMAXs were just slightly better, shooting around .55-.70" avg while the 175SMKs were grouping around .7-.9" in fairly breezy conditons on the 1st day. I suspected that I was underloading the 175s a bit, so I was able to chrono them both today using a friend's gucci chronograph. I was pushing the 175SMKs right around 2490-2510 with pretty small E/S's using 42.8, 43.0 and 43.2 of RL-15. The 168 AMAXs were loaded to 45.0 of RL-15 and we chrono'd them right at about 2640.
I re-shot all the loads I tested on Monday but this time I was able to try them at 300, 400 and 550 yds. I expected the 175 SMKs to do better at range but in truth the 168 AMAXs kicked the shit out of the SMKs. I suspect the issue is the 175SMKs are probably going too slow - since most of the group size was horizontal stringing. I was probably only getting maybe 2.5" of verticle from both types of bullets - but the 175s were moving a LOT more due to wind.
My question is: Should I stick with the 168 AMAXs (I'll have to buy more) or just get my 175 SMKs going faster and use them since I have a whole crap laod of them? What's a reasonable MV that I should shoot to get to with the 175s? I was really surprised at how slow the 43.0 grains of RL-15 with a 175 is with this gun. I expected it to be roughly 100fps faster with that load based on some of the other Hide members using that as a pet load.
Thanks!
On a side note - what do folks think of the 178 AMAX? Would it have any advantage over the 168 version at 600yds?
Anyway, the results somewhat surprised me. At 100yds, the 168 AMAXs were just slightly better, shooting around .55-.70" avg while the 175SMKs were grouping around .7-.9" in fairly breezy conditons on the 1st day. I suspected that I was underloading the 175s a bit, so I was able to chrono them both today using a friend's gucci chronograph. I was pushing the 175SMKs right around 2490-2510 with pretty small E/S's using 42.8, 43.0 and 43.2 of RL-15. The 168 AMAXs were loaded to 45.0 of RL-15 and we chrono'd them right at about 2640.
I re-shot all the loads I tested on Monday but this time I was able to try them at 300, 400 and 550 yds. I expected the 175 SMKs to do better at range but in truth the 168 AMAXs kicked the shit out of the SMKs. I suspect the issue is the 175SMKs are probably going too slow - since most of the group size was horizontal stringing. I was probably only getting maybe 2.5" of verticle from both types of bullets - but the 175s were moving a LOT more due to wind.
My question is: Should I stick with the 168 AMAXs (I'll have to buy more) or just get my 175 SMKs going faster and use them since I have a whole crap laod of them? What's a reasonable MV that I should shoot to get to with the 175s? I was really surprised at how slow the 43.0 grains of RL-15 with a 175 is with this gun. I expected it to be roughly 100fps faster with that load based on some of the other Hide members using that as a pet load.
Thanks!
On a side note - what do folks think of the 178 AMAX? Would it have any advantage over the 168 version at 600yds?