Can somebody in the optics industry tell me why scopemakers are not making internal anti-cant bubbles in their scopes?
I have an older Springfield Armory scope on my AR-10 (TU) that has the internal Anti-Cant bubble. It is circa year 2000 when they still made good scopes, and the optical clarity isn't bad for the $700 I paid back then. The internal bubble helps tremendously when shooting 800+ yards from a prone position on non-level ground to a target that is on another slope at distance.
Anyway I am putting a Leupold Mk 4 6.5-20 on a Surgeon rifle build and I can't figure out why some higher-end scopes aren't doing what really works. Am I missing something?
I am currently looking at the US optics Non-folding AC and Co-sine device on the scope (Unless someone has a better suggestion). Obviously you have to use your weak eye to view the bubble as your strong eye maintains target.
Any insight would be appreciated.
I have an older Springfield Armory scope on my AR-10 (TU) that has the internal Anti-Cant bubble. It is circa year 2000 when they still made good scopes, and the optical clarity isn't bad for the $700 I paid back then. The internal bubble helps tremendously when shooting 800+ yards from a prone position on non-level ground to a target that is on another slope at distance.
Anyway I am putting a Leupold Mk 4 6.5-20 on a Surgeon rifle build and I can't figure out why some higher-end scopes aren't doing what really works. Am I missing something?
I am currently looking at the US optics Non-folding AC and Co-sine device on the scope (Unless someone has a better suggestion). Obviously you have to use your weak eye to view the bubble as your strong eye maintains target.
Any insight would be appreciated.