After 10 minutes I still wasn’t sure where to post this so I hope I’m correct 
So I’m just curious as most homeowners and renters insurance policies have a limitation on firearms and “related equipment”. Hence my question.
Scopes are related, but I am just curious if anybody has officially or legally encountered a scenario where their thermal imager was lost or stolen and a claim was made and the insurance company refused to pay over and above the firearm limit claiming it was “related equipment?”
In my case it could be particularly difficult as I have the M300W and since it has the capability to be used as one, regardless if I use it solely helmet mounted, that maybe they could claim it was a rifle scope?
Has anybody in sniper land run into this issue?
So I’m just curious as most homeowners and renters insurance policies have a limitation on firearms and “related equipment”. Hence my question.
Scopes are related, but I am just curious if anybody has officially or legally encountered a scenario where their thermal imager was lost or stolen and a claim was made and the insurance company refused to pay over and above the firearm limit claiming it was “related equipment?”
In my case it could be particularly difficult as I have the M300W and since it has the capability to be used as one, regardless if I use it solely helmet mounted, that maybe they could claim it was a rifle scope?
Has anybody in sniper land run into this issue?